PreprintCited by 240DNA Repair MechanismsCancer-related Molecular PathwaysGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics

The structural determinants of checkpoint activation

Open access
MacDougall, Christina A., Byun, Tony S., Van, Christopher, Yee, Muh-ching, Cimprich, Karlene A.·2007·Genes & Development

Abstract

Here, we demonstrate that primed, single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) is sufficient for activation of the ATR-dependent checkpoint pathway in Xenopus egg extracts. Using this structure, we define the contribution of the 5′- and 3′-primer ends to Chk1 activation when replication is blocked and ongoing. In addition, we show that although ssDNA is not sufficient for checkpoint activation, the amount of ssDNA adjacent to the primer influences the level of Chk1 phosphorylation. These observations define the minimal DNA requirements for checkpoint activation and suggest that primed ssDNA represents a common checkpoint activating-structure formed following many types of damage.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/gad.1522607

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MacDougall, C. A., Byun, T. S., Van, C., Yee, M.-C., & Cimprich, K. A.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Cimprich, Karlene A.
Venue
Genes & Development
Published
2007-04-15
Volume
21
Issue
8
Pages
898-903
ISSN
  • 0890-9369 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-5477
OpenAlex
W2128322002
Cited by
240
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 10
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genes & Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Defense
  • American Cancer Society
  • Leukemia and Lymphoma Society
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM62193, R01GM062193)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (R01ES016486)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Keywords
DNA damage checkpoint, ATR signaling, Chk1 phosphorylation, single-stranded DNA, DNA replication block, checkpoint activation, Xenopus egg extracts, DNA damage response
MeSH terms
Checkpoint Kinase 1, Animals, Cell Cycle, DNA Damage, DNA Replication, DNA, Single-Stranded, Ovum, Phosphorylation, Protein Kinases, Xenopus laevis, S Phase, Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases, Cell Cycle Proteins, Xenopus Proteins, Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review