Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 119

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The p53 C Terminus Controls Site-Specific DNA Binding and Promotes Structural Changes within the Central DNA Binding Domain

Laptenko, Oleg, Shiff, Idit, Freed-Pastor, Will, Zupnick, Andrew, Mattia, Melissa, Freulich, Ella, Shamir, Inbal, Kadouri, Noam, Kahan, Tamar, Manfredi, James, Simon, Itamar, Prives, Carol·2015·Molecular Cell
DOI 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.02.015
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.02.015

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

1 more claim about this paper

Create a free account to see every claim other papers make about this one.

See all claims — free account

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 11 references

Research works printed but not linked: 57

  1. An, 2004, Ordered cooperative functions of PRMT1, p300, and CARM1 in transcriptional activation by p53, Cell, 117, 735, 10.1016/j.cell.2004.05.009 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Anderson, 1997, Reciprocal interference between the sequence-specific core and nonspecific C-terminal DNA binding domains of p53: implications for regulation, Mol. Cell. Biol., 17, 6255, 10.1128/MCB.17.11.6255 · DOI
  3. Ayed, 2001, Latent and active p53 are identical in conformation, Nat. Struct. Biol., 8, 756, 10.1038/nsb0901-756 · DOI
  4. Barlev, 2001, Acetylation of p53 activates transcription through recruitment of coactivators/histone acetyltransferases, Mol. Cell, 8, 1243, 10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00414-2 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Beno, 2011, Sequence-dependent cooperative binding of p53 to DNA targets and its relationship to the structural properties of the DNA targets, Nucleic Acids Res., 39, 1919, 10.1093/nar/gkq1044 · DOI
  6. Botcheva, 2011, Distinct p53 genomic binding patterns in normal and cancer-derived human cells, Cell Cycle, 10, 4237, 10.4161/cc.10.24.18383 · DOI
  7. Chen, 1996, p53 levels, functional domains, and DNA damage determine the extent of the apoptotic response of tumor cells, Genes Dev., 10, 2438, 10.1101/gad.10.19.2438 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Chuikov, 2004, Regulation of p53 activity through lysine methylation, Nature, 432, 353, 10.1038/nature03117 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Espinosa, 2001, Transcriptional regulation by p53 through intrinsic DNA/chromatin binding and site-directed cofactor recruitment, Mol. Cell, 8, 57, 10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00283-0 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Frankel, 1991, Modular structure of transcription factors: implications for gene regulation, Cell, 65, 717, 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90378-C · DOI · Paper page
  11. Friedler, 2005, Modulation of binding of DNA to the C-terminal domain of p53 by acetylation, Structure, 13, 629, 10.1016/j.str.2005.01.020 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Frith, 2008, Discovering sequence motifs with arbitrary insertions and deletions, PLoS Comput. Biol., 4, e1000071, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000071 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Funk, 1992, A transcriptionally active DNA-binding site for human p53 protein complexes, Mol. Cell. Biol., 12, 2866
  14. Gopinath, 2007, Methods developed for SELEX, Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 387, 171, 10.1007/s00216-006-0826-2 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Gu, 1997, Activation of p53 sequence-specific DNA binding by acetylation of the p53 C-terminal domain, Cell, 90, 595, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80521-8 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Gu, 2001, Identification of p53 sequence elements that are required for MDM2-mediated nuclear export, Mol. Cell. Biol., 21, 8533, 10.1128/MCB.21.24.8533-8546.2001 · DOI
  17. Hager, 2009, Transcription dynamics, Mol. Cell, 35, 741, 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.09.005 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Hamard, 2012, p53 basic C terminus regulates p53 functions through DNA binding modulation of subset of target genes, J. Biol. Chem., 287, 22397, 10.1074/jbc.M111.331298 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Hamard, 2013, The C terminus of p53 regulates gene expression by multiple mechanisms in a target- and tissue-specific manner in vivo, Genes Dev., 27, 1868, 10.1101/gad.224386.113 · DOI
  20. Hoh, 2002, The p53MH algorithm and its application in detecting p53-responsive genes, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 99, 8467, 10.1073/pnas.132268899 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Huggins, 2011, DECOD: fast and accurate discriminative DNA motif finding, Bioinformatics, 27, 2361, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr412 · DOI
  22. Hupp, 1994, Allosteric activation of latent p53 tetramers, Curr. Biol., 4, 865, 10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00195-0 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Hupp, 1992, Regulation of the specific DNA binding function of p53, Cell, 71, 875, 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90562-Q · DOI · Paper page
  24. Ito, 2001, p300/CBP-mediated p53 acetylation is commonly induced by p53-activating agents and inhibited by MDM2, EMBO J., 20, 1331, 10.1093/emboj/20.6.1331 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Jayaraman, 1995, Activation of p53 sequence-specific DNA binding by short single strands of DNA requires the p53 C-terminus, Cell, 81, 1021, 10.1016/S0092-8674(05)80007-8 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Joerger, 2008, Structural biology of the tumor suppressor p53, Annu. Rev. Biochem., 77, 557, 10.1146/annurev.biochem.77.060806.091238 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Kim, 2012, p53 requires an intact C-terminal domain for DNA binding and transactivation, J. Mol. Biol., 415, 843, 10.1016/j.jmb.2011.12.001 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Kitayner, 2006, Structural basis of DNA recognition by p53 tetramers, Mol. Cell, 22, 741, 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.05.015 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Krummel, 2005, The C-terminal lysines fine-tune P53 stress responses in a mouse model but are not required for stability control or transactivation, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 102, 10188, 10.1073/pnas.0503068102 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Laptenko, 2006, Transcriptional regulation by p53: one protein, many possibilities, Cell Death Differ., 13, 951, 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401916 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Laptenko, 2003, Transcript cleavage factors GreA and GreB act as transient catalytic components of RNA polymerase, EMBO J., 22, 6322, 10.1093/emboj/cdg610 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Laptenko, 2011, p53 binding to nucleosomes within the p21 promoter in vivo leads to nucleosome loss and transcriptional activation, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 108, 10385, 10.1073/pnas.1105680108 · DOI
  33. Larson, 2011, What do expression dynamics tell us about the mechanism of transcription?, Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev., 21, 591, 10.1016/j.gde.2011.07.010 · DOI
  34. Lee, 2000, Local structural elements in the mostly unstructured transcriptional activation domain of human p53, J. Biol. Chem., 275, 29426, 10.1074/jbc.M003107200 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Li, 2002, Acetylation of p53 inhibits its ubiquitination by Mdm2, J. Biol. Chem., 277, 50607, 10.1074/jbc.C200578200 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Lohrum, 2001, C-terminal ubiquitination of p53 contributes to nuclear export, Mol. Cell. Biol., 21, 8521, 10.1128/MCB.21.24.8521-8532.2001 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Luo, 2004, Acetylation of p53 augments its site-specific DNA binding both in vitro and in vivo, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 101, 2259, 10.1073/pnas.0308762101 · DOI · Paper page
  38. McKinney, 2004, p53 linear diffusion along DNA requires its C terminus, Mol. Cell, 16, 413, 10.1016/j.molcel.2004.09.032 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Mujtaba, 2004, Structural mechanism of the bromodomain of the coactivator CBP in p53 transcriptional activation, Mol. Cell, 13, 251, 10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00528-8 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Nagaich, 1997, DNA bending is essential for the site-specific recognition of DNA response elements by the DNA binding domain of the tumor suppressor protein p53, J. Biol. Chem., 272, 14842, 10.1074/jbc.272.23.14842 · DOI
  41. Nakamura, 2000, Multiple lysine mutations in the C-terminal domain of p53 interfere with MDM2-dependent protein degradation and ubiquitination, Mol. Cell. Biol., 20, 9391, 10.1128/MCB.20.24.9391-9398.2000 · DOI
  42. Nie, 2007, Regulation of p53 nuclear export through sequential changes in conformation and ubiquitination, J. Biol. Chem., 282, 14616, 10.1074/jbc.M610515200 · DOI
  43. Nikulenkov, 2012, Insights into p53 transcriptional function via genome-wide chromatin occupancy and gene expression analysis, Cell Death Differ., 19, 1992, 10.1038/cdd.2012.89 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Okorokov, 2006, The structure of p53 tumour suppressor protein reveals the basis for its functional plasticity, EMBO J., 25, 5191, 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601382 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Petty, 2011, An induced fit mechanism regulates p53 DNA binding kinetics to confer sequence specificity, EMBO J., 30, 2167, 10.1038/emboj.2011.127 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Piluso, 2005, Purification of acetyl-p53 using p300 co-infection and the baculovirus expression system, Protein Expr. Purif., 40, 370, 10.1016/j.pep.2004.12.015 · DOI
  47. Poyurovsky, 2010, The C terminus of p53 binds the N-terminal domain of MDM2, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol., 17, 982, 10.1038/nsmb.1872 · DOI
  48. Rodriguez, 2000, Multiple C-terminal lysine residues target p53 for ubiquitin-proteasome-mediated degradation, Mol. Cell. Biol., 20, 8458, 10.1128/MCB.20.22.8458-8467.2000 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Rustandi, 2000, Structure of the negative regulatory domain of p53 bound to S100B(betabeta), Nat. Struct. Biol., 7, 570, 10.1038/76797 · DOI
  50. Simeonova, 2013, Mutant mice lacking the p53 C-terminal domain model telomere syndromes, Cell Rep., 3, 2046, 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.05.028 · DOI
  51. Spolar, 1994, Coupling of local folding to site-specific binding of proteins to DNA, Science, 263, 777, 10.1126/science.8303294 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Stommel, 1999, A leucine-rich nuclear export signal in the p53 tetramerization domain: regulation of subcellular localization and p53 activity by NES masking, EMBO J., 18, 1660, 10.1093/emboj/18.6.1660 · DOI · Paper page
  53. Tafvizi, 2011, A single-molecule characterization of p53 search on DNA, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 108, 563, 10.1073/pnas.1016020107 · DOI · Paper page
  54. Temiakov, 2003, Probing the organization of transcription complexes using photoreactive 4-thio-substituted analogs of uracil and thymidine, Methods Enzymol., 371, 133, 10.1016/S0076-6879(03)71009-X · doi:10.1016/s0076-6879(03)71009-x
  55. Tidow, 2007, Quaternary structures of tumor suppressor p53 and a specific p53 DNA complex, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 104, 12324, 10.1073/pnas.0705069104 · DOI · Paper page
  56. Trauger, 2001, Footprinting methods for analysis of pyrrole-imidazole polyamide/DNA complexes, Methods Enzymol., 340, 450, 10.1016/S0076-6879(01)40436-8 · DOI
  57. Wu, 2014, Phosphorylation of p53 by TAF1 inactivates p53-dependent transcription in the DNA damage response, Mol. Cell, 53, 63, 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.10.031 · DOI

Cited by

See all 119

Metadata

Authors
Laptenko, O., Shiff, I., Freed-Pastor, W., Zupnick, A., Mattia, M., Freulich, E., Shamir, I., Kadouri, N., Kahan, T., Manfredi, J., Simon, I., & Prives, C.
Venue
Molecular Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-03
Volume
57
Issue
6
Pages
1034-1046
ISSN
1097-2765
DOI
10.1016/j.molcel.2015.02.015
Cited by
119
References
11
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The p53 C Terminus Controls Site-Specific DNA Binding and Promotes Structural Changes within the Central DNA Binding Domain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.molcel.2015.02.015
The paper
Laptenko, O., Shiff, I., Freed-Pastor, W., Zupnick, A., Mattia, M., Freulich, E., Shamir, I., Kadouri, N., Kahan, T., Manfredi, J., Simon, I., & Prives, C. (2015). The p53 C Terminus Controls Site-Specific DNA Binding and Promotes Structural Changes within the Central DNA Binding Domain. Molecular Cell. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2015.02.015

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.