Cited by 359Prenatal Substance Exposure EffectsSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesFetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders

Defining the behavioral phenotype in children with fetal alcohol spectrum disorders: A review

Kodituwakku, P.W.·2007·Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Abstract

While there exists a large body of literature on cognitive functions in children with prenatal alcohol exposure, it remains undetermined if these children exhibit a unique profile of cognitive-behavioral functioning or a behavioral phenotype. Researchers have consistently found that intellectual functioning, as assessed by IQ tests, of children with prenatal alcohol exposure is deficient. There is increasing evidence that prenatal alcohol exposure is associated with slow information processing and attentional problems, in particular inattentiveness. Studies examining specific cognitive abilities such as language, visual perception, and memory in alcohol-affected children have shown performance decrements associated with increased task complexity. Children with prenatal alcohol exposure have also been found to exhibit significant deficits in daily functional skills or adaptive behavior, with deficits in socialization becoming pronounced during adolescence. The above findings point to the conclusion that a generalized deficit in complex information processing constitutes the central cognitive-behavioral characteristic of children with prenatal alcohol exposure. Researchers have consistently documented that specific brain regions are more affected by alcohol than other regions. The problem of mapping focal anomalies of the brain with a generalized pattern of deficits can be solved by taking developmental processes into consideration.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2006.06.020

Cites

93 of 93 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kodituwakku, P. W.
Affiliations
University of New Mexico (US)
Corresponding author
Kodituwakku, P.W.
Venue
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-01
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
192-201
ISSN
0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2089055897
Cited by
359
References
92
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 27
FWCI
2.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
Keywords
fetal alcohol spectrum disorders, prenatal alcohol exposure, behavioral phenotypes, intellectual functioning, inattention, attention deficits, information processing deficits, adaptive behavior, socialization deficits, language deficits, visual perception, memory impairment, developmental processes
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavioral Symptoms, Child, Cognition, Female, Humans, Language, Learning, Male, Models, Biological, Phenotype, Pregnancy, Problem Solving, Visual Perception, Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review