Cited by 16Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchProteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans researchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Chondroitin sulfate demarcates astrocytic territories in the mammalian cerebral cortex

Horii-Hayashi, Noriko, Tatsumi, Kouko, Matsusue, Yumiko, Okuda, Hiroaki, Okuda, Aya, Hayashi, Motoharu, Yano, Humiko, Tsuboi, Akio +3 more·2010·Neuroscience Letters

Abstract

Adjacent astrocytes in the grey matter of the mammalian cerebral cortex are organized in a tile-like manner and separated from one another, forming discrete domains named "non-overlapping territories". We have previously reported that an anti-chondroitin sulfate (CS) antibody, CS-56, marks a subpopulation of cortical astrocytes which we named the dandelion clock-like structure (DACS) based on its morphological characteristics. In the present study, we found that another anti-CS antibody (anti-CS-C) was also able to detect the DACS and the morphological analysis revealed that a single DACS enwrapped five to six neuronal somata on average, which indicated that DACS coincided with a single astrocyte territory. Double labeling of CS-C and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) showed a slight overlap between the two territories in the adult cerebral cortex of mice. The neuron number enwrapped by a single DACS was unchanged between 3- and 7-week-old mice, while more extensive processes of DACSs were found in 7-week-old mice compared with those in 3-week-old ones. Moreover, the measurement of a single DACS area was significantly increased by 45% between 3- and 7-week-old mice. In addition, DACSs were found in human, monkey, and domestic pig brains, but not mallard ones, indicating that DACS was conserved in mammalian species. Taken together, CS demarcates territories of a certain population of cortical astrocytes and the cerebral cortex is composed of CS-rich astrocytes and -poor astrocytes in a mosaic fashion.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.07.064

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Horii-Hayashi, N., Tatsumi, K., Matsusue, Y., Okuda, H., Okuda, A., Hayashi, M., Yano, H., Tsuboi, A., Nishi, M., Yoshikawa, M., & Wanaka, A.
Affiliations
  • Nara Medical University (JP)
  • Kyoto University (JP)
  • Kindai University (JP)
Corresponding author
Wanaka, Akio
Venue
Neuroscience Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-10
Volume
483
Issue
1
Pages
67-72
ISSN
0304-3940 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1978230117
Cited by
16
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
chondroitin sulfate, cortical astrocytes, astrocyte-neuron interaction, glial fibrillary acidic protein, astrocyte morphology, astrocyte development, species conservation, cerebral cortex
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Analysis of Variance, Animals, Astrocytes, Cerebral Cortex, Chondroitin Sulfates, Ducks, Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Macaca, Neurons, Species Specificity, Swine, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review