Cited by 767Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsConnexins and lens biology

Synaptic Islands Defined by the Territory of a Single Astrocyte

Open access
Halassa, M. M., Fellin, T., Takano, H., Dong, J.-H., Haydon, P. G.·2007·Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

In the mammalian brain, astrocytes modulate neuronal function, in part, by synchronizing neuronal firing and coordinating synaptic networks. Little, however, is known about how this is accomplished from a structural standpoint. To investigate the structural basis of astrocyte-mediated neuronal synchrony and synaptic coordination, the three-dimensional relationships between cortical astrocytes and neurons was investigated. Using a transgenic and viral approach to label astrocytes with enhanced green fluorescent protein, we performed a three-dimensional reconstruction of astrocytes from tissue sections or live animals in vivo. We found that cortical astrocytes occupy nonoverlapping territories similar to those described in the hippocampus. Using immunofluorescence labeling of neuronal somata, a single astrocyte enwraps on average four neuronal somata with an upper limit of eight. Single-neuron dye-fills allowed us to estimate that one astrocyte contacts 300-600 neuronal dendrites. Together with the recent findings showing that glial Ca2+ signaling is restricted to individual astrocytes in vivo, and that Ca2+ signaling leads to gliotransmission, we propose the concept of functional islands of synapses in which groups of synapses confined within the boundaries of an individual astrocyte are modulated by the gliotransmitter environment controlled by that astrocyte. Our description offers a new structurally based conceptual framework to evaluate functional data involving interactions between neurons and astrocytes in the mammalian brain.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.1419-07.2007

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Each astrocyte is in contact with up to four capillaries and enwraps about four neuronal cell bodies and 105 synapses.

    “Interposed between neurons and the vasculature, each astrocyte is in contact with up to four capillaries and enwraps about four neuronal cell bodies and 105 synapses [395,396,397].”

    From Revisiting the Pathogenesis of X-Linked Adrenoleukodystrophy (2025) · cites this paper as [397]

    The section ‘Single astrocytes enwrap multiple neuronal cell bodies’ reports an average of four neuronal somata per cortical astrocyte. The Introduction reports that a hippocampal astrocyte can contact more than 100,000 synapses, citing earlier work; it does not establish that number for each astrocyte. No passage found supports contact with up to four capillaries. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • At the microscale, an entire astrocyte activates and may exert coordinated influence on synaptic ensembles in its territory.

    “second, a microscale, on the order of a single astrocyte, at which the entire cell activates and may exert a coordinated influence on synaptic ensembles residing in its territory 29, 129”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Halassa, M. M., Fellin, T., Takano, H., Dong, J.-H., & Haydon, P. G.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Haydon, P. G.
Venue
Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2007-06-13
Volume
27
Issue
24
Pages
6473-6477
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2032730787
Cited by
767
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 55 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 39
FWCI
13.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (P20MH071705, MH071705)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS-047321, NS-043142, NS-037585, NS054770, R01NS054770, R01NS037585, R37NS037585, R01NS043142, P30NS047321)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Connexins and lens biology
Keywords
astrocytes, astrocyte-neuron interaction, neuronal synchronization, 3D reconstruction, gliotransmission, cortical astrocytes, neuronal somata
MeSH terms
Animals, Astrocytes, Cell Communication, Cerebral Cortex, Dendrites, Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein, Humans, Mice, Transgenic, Synaptic Transmission, Neurons, Synapses, Transduction, Genetic, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Green Fluorescent Proteins, Vesicle-Associated Membrane Protein 2, Mice, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review