Cited by 11Medical Image Segmentation TechniquesMorphological variations and asymmetry3D Shape Modeling and Analysis

Amygdalar shape analysis method using surface contour aligning, spherical mapping, and probabilistic subregional segmentation

Open access
Kim, Namkug, Kim, Hengjun J., Hwang, Jaeuk, Yoon, Sujung J., Cho, Han Byul, Renshaw, Perry F., Lyoo, In Kyoon, Kim, Jieun E.·2011·Neuroscience Letters

Abstract

The objective of this study was to develop a reliable method for the shape analysis of the amygdala, a structure that is important in gaining a better understanding of the limbic system in the human brain. The goal of this study was threefold; to develop (1) a robust method for aligning the contour of the amygdala; (2) a reproducible method for extracting surface parameters of the amygdala using a spherical mapping technique; and (3) a standardized approach for statistical assessment and visualization of shape alterations by applying the probabilistic maps of amygdalar subregions. This technique was validated by conducting an artificial phantom study and by assessing sex-related amygdalar shape differences using T1-weighted images from healthy volunteers. In the phantom study, the region with atrophy was detected successfully through the shape analysis process. In the human study, the average radii of the centromedial (CM) subregion in the left amygdala and laterobasal (LB), superficial (SF) and CM subregions in the right amygdala were different between sexes (t-tests, p=0.02, 0.04, 0.04, and 0.002, respectively). In addition, focal regions with larger radii in amygdalae of men than those of women were found predominantly on the surfaces of bilateral SF and bilateral CM subregions, after the volumes of the amygdala had been scaled to the unit volume (1000mm(3)) (Mann-Whitney U-test, false discovery rate corrected p<0.05, clustered vertex points>25). Regions with smaller radii in amygdalae of men were found predominantly on the anterior surfaces of the right LB and SF subregions (Mann-Whitney U-test, false discovery rate corrected p<0.05, clustered vertex points>25). This is generally in agreement with previous findings from animal studies. The current method may be used for measuring subtle local shape changes of the amygdala in various psychiatric or neurologic disorders.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.11.005

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prior studies in adults have found sex differences in the shape and volume of amygdala sub-regions and in resting-state functional connectivity of non-limbic brain regions.

    “Previous studies in adults have reported sex differences in amygdala sub-region shape and volume (Kim et al., 2011, Kim et al., 2012) and in RSFC of non-limbic brain regions using a variety of analytic methods (Kilpatrick et al., 2006, Biswal et al., 2010, Tian et al., 2011, Casanova et al., 2012, Satterthwaite et al., 2014).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, N., Kim, H. J., Hwang, J., Yoon, S. J., Cho, H. B., Renshaw, P. F., Lyoo, I. K., & Kim, J. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Ulsan (KR)
  • Seoul National University (KR)
  • Soonchunhyang University (KR)
  • Catholic University of Korea (KR)
  • University of Utah (US)
Venue
Neuroscience Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-01
Volume
488
Issue
1
Pages
65-69
ISSN
0304-3940 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1983682982
Cited by
11
References
43
Citations by year
2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuroscience Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Research Foundation (KRF-2007-511-H00002, 2009-0074584, 2009-0066915)
  • Korea Research Foundation (KRF-2008-220-E00021)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Morphological variations and asymmetry
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
Keywords
amygdala, shape analysis, spherical mapping, sex differences, amygdala atrophy, limbic system, T1-weighted imaging
MeSH terms
Amygdala, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Statistics, Nonparametric

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review