Cited by 14Medicinal Plants and NeuroprotectionAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Evaluation of the pre-treatment effect of Centella asiatica medicinal plants on long-term potentiation (LTP) in rat model of Alzheimer's disease

Doulah, Abdolhassan, Mahmoodi, Gelavij, Pourmahdi Borujeni, Mahdi·2020·Neuroscience Letters

Abstract

The present study was aimed to investigate the pre-treatment effect of Centella asiatica (CeA) extract on long-term potentiation (LTP) in a rat model of Alzheimer's disease (AD). A total of 32 male Wistar rats weighing 380 ± 30 g were randomly divided into four groups (n = 8). Group 1 (C: Control): the control group. Group 2 (L: Lesion): The nucleus basalis of Meynert (NBM) of rats' brain was bilaterally destroyed by injection of Ibotenic acid. Group 3 (CeA): Animals in this group received the CeA leaf extract for only a period of six weeks. Group 4 (CeA + L): The NBM of rats was destroyed by Ibotenic acid after six weeks of a diet containing the CeA leaf extract. In all groups, LTP was recorded using the electrophysiological technique and fEPSP after high frequency stimulation (HFS). The results showed that the slope and amplitude of PS as well as the sub-curve level significantly increased in the CeA + L group compared with the L and CeA groups. The CeA extract improved and strengthened the slope, amplitude and sub-curve surface of cumulative waves in animals with NBM lesion. The results showed that administration CeA extract for six weeks before induction of NBM lesion and induction of Alzheimer could enhance memory. In other words, the CeA extract had a preventive or protective role. The present study showed that CeA had a protective role for neurons among rats with NBM lesion.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neulet.2020.135026

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Doulah, A., Mahmoodi, G., & Pourmahdi Borujeni, M.
Affiliations
  • Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz Branch (IR)
  • Islamic Azad University of Kermanshah (IR)
Corresponding author
Doulah, Abdolhassan
Venue
Neuroscience Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-06
Volume
729
Pages
135026
ISSN
0304-3940 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3021038704
Cited by
14
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3
FWCI
2.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ahvaz Branch, Islamic Azad University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Medicinal Plants and Neuroprotection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
Centella asiatica, Alzheimer's disease, long-term potentiation, ibotenic acid, pretreatment, memory enhancement, neuroprotection, field excitatory postsynaptic potentials, plant extracts
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Hippocampus, Ibotenic Acid, Male, Memory, Neurons, Plants, Medicinal, Rats, Wistar, Long-Term Potentiation, Basal Nucleus of Meynert

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review