Cited by 46Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsStress Responses and CortisolTryptophan and brain disorders

Sex differences in prefrontal cortex microglia morphology: Impact of a two-hit model of adversity throughout development

Open access
Gildawie, Kelsea R., Orso, Rodrigo, Peterzell, Shayna, Thompson, Vanessa, Brenhouse, Heather C.·2020·Neuroscience Letters

Abstract

Neuroimmune mechanisms play critical roles in brain development and can be impacted by early life adversity. Microglia are the resident immune cells in the brain, with both sex-specific and region-specific developmental profiles. Since early life adversity is associated with several neuropsychiatric disorders with developmental pathogeneses, here we investigated the degree to which maternal separation (MS) impacted microglia over development. Microglia are dynamic cells that alter their morphology in accordance with their functions and in response to stressors. While males and females reportedly display different microglial morphology in several brain regions over development and following immune and psychological challenges, little is known about such differences in the prefrontal cortex (PFC), which regulates several early life adversity-attributable disorders. Additionally, little is known about the potential for early life adversity to prime microglia for later immune challenges. In the current study, male and female rats were exposed to MS followed by lipopolysaccharide administration in juvenility or adolescence. The prelimbic and infralimbic PFC were then separately analyzed for microglial density and morphology. Typically developing males expressed smaller soma and less arborization than females in juvenility, but larger soma than females in adolescence. MS led to fewer microglia in the infralimbic PFC of adolescent males. Both MS and lipopolysaccharide administration affected morphological characteristics in juvenile males and females, with MS exposure leading to a greater increase in soma size following lipopolysaccharide. Interestingly, effects of MS and lipopolysaccharide were not observed in adolescence, while notable sex differences in PFC microglial morphology were apparent. Taken together, these findings provide insight into how PFC microglia may differentially respond to challenges over development in males and females.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neulet.2020.135381

Cites

81 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • During normal physiological conditions, adult male mice tend to exhibit denser microglia in the hippocampus, cortex, and amygdala, whereas female rats typically display longer and more extensively branched microglial processes in the prefrontal cortex around adolescence.

    “During normal physiological conditions, it has been shown that adult male mice tend to exhibit denser microglia in the hippocampus, cortex, and amygdala, whereas female rats typically display longer and more extensively branched microglial processes in the prefrontal cortex around adolescence, indicating possible differences in microglial surveillance between sexes, brain regions and time points [”

    From Sex chromosomes and sex hormones differently shape microglial properties during normal physiological conditions in the adult mouse hippocampus (2025) · cites this paper as [46]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [11]Buttini M, Limonta S, Boddeke HW, Peripheral administration of lipopolysaccharide induces activation of microglial cells in rat brain, Neurochem Int 29 (1996) 25– 35. 8808786

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gildawie, K. R., Orso, R., Peterzell, S., Thompson, V., & Brenhouse, H. C.
Affiliations
Northeastern University (US)
Corresponding author
Brenhouse, Heather C.
Venue
Neuroscience Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-11
Volume
738
Pages
135381
ISSN
0304-3940 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3085610866
Cited by
46
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6
FWCI
1.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuroscience Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (5R21MH097182-02)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Biological Psychiatry › Tryptophan and brain disorders
Keywords
microglial morphology, sex differences, prefrontal cortex, childhood adversity, maternal separation, lipopolysaccharide, neuroinflammation, prelimbic cortex, infralimbic cortex, developmental programming, adolescence, juvenile development, neuroimmune mechanisms
MeSH terms
Animals, Female, Lipopolysaccharides, Male, Maternal Deprivation, Sex Characteristics, Stress, Psychological, Prefrontal Cortex, Microglia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review