Cited by 253Fatty Acid Research and HealthDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Effects of omega-3 fatty acids on cognitive performance: a meta-analysis

Mazereeuw, Graham, Lanctôt, Krista L., Chau, Sarah A., Swardfager, Walter, Herrmann, Nathan·2012·Neurobiology of Aging

Abstract

Background Higher intake of omega-3 fatty acids (n-3 FAs) is associated with a reduced risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and milder forms of cognitive impairment (e.g. cognitive impairment no dementia [CIND]); however, findings from interventional trials are inconsistent. This meta-analysis examined the neuropsychological benefit of n-3 FAs in randomized double-blind placebo-controlled studies (RCTs) including healthy, CIND, or AD subjects.Methods Literature was searched using Medline, Embase, PsycInfo, Cochrane Library, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database (AMED), and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) up to September 2011. Treatment effects were summarized across cognitive subdomains, and effect sizes were estimated using Hedge's g and random effects modeling.Results Ten RCTs were combined quantitatively. There was no effect of n-3 FAs on composite memory (g = 0.04 [95% CI: -0.06-0.14], N = 934/812, p = 0.452). When examined by domain, no overall benefit for immediate recall (0.04 [-0.05-0.13], N = 934/812, p = 0.358) was detected; however, an effect in CIND subjects (0.16 [0.01-0.31], N = 349/327, p = 0.034) was found. A benefit for attention and processing speed was also detected in CIND (0.30 [0.02-0.57], N = 107/86, p = 0.035), but not healthy subjects. Benefits for delayed recall, recognition memory, or working memory and executive function were not observed. Treatment did not benefit AD patients as measured by the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) or Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-cog). No differences in adverse events (AE), dropout, or dropout due to AE between groups were observed.Conclusions These results suggest an effect of n-3 FAs within specific cognitive domains in CIND, but not in healthy or AD subjects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2011.12.014

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mazereeuw, G., Lanctôt, K. L., Chau, S. A., Swardfager, W., & Herrmann, N.
Affiliations
Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA)
Corresponding author
Herrmann, Nathan
Venue
Neurobiology of Aging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-07
Volume
33
Issue
7
Pages
1482.e17-1482.e29
ISSN
0197-4580 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2044850402
Cited by
253
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurobiology of Aging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • American Psychological Association
  • Alzheimer Society Research Program
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Fatty Acid Research and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
omega-3 fatty acids, cognitive performance, Alzheimer's disease, cognitive impairment without dementia, memory, attention and processing speed, dietary supplementation, neuropsychological outcomes
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Cognition Disorders, Humans, Mental Recall, Fatty Acids, Omega-3, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review