Cited by 297Fatty Acid Research and HealthDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNutritional Studies and Diet

Effects of n-3 fatty acids, EPA v. DHA, on depressive symptoms, quality of life, memory and executive function in older adults with mild cognitive impairment: a 6-month randomised controlled trial

Open access
Sinn, Natalie, Milte, Catherine M., Street, Steven J., Buckley, Jonathan D., Coates, Alison M., Petkov, John, Howe, Peter R. C.·2012·British Journal of Nutrition

Abstract

Depressive symptoms may increase the risk of progressing from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to dementia. Consumption of n-3 PUFA may alleviate both cognitive decline and depression. The aim of the present study was to investigate the benefits of supplementing a diet with n-3 PUFA, DHA and EPA, for depressive symptoms, quality of life (QOL) and cognition in elderly people with MCI. We conducted a 6-month double-blind, randomised controlled trial. A total of fifty people aged >65 years with MCI were allocated to receive a supplement rich in EPA (1·67 g EPA+0·16 g DHA/d;n 17), DHA (1·55 g DHA+0·40 g EPA/d;n 18) or the n-6 PUFA linoleic acid (LA; 2·2 g/d;n 15). Treatment allocation was by minimisation based on age, sex and depressive symptoms (Geriatric Depression Scale, GDS). Physiological and cognitive assessments, questionnaires and fatty acid composition of erythrocytes were obtained at baseline and 6 months (completers:n 40; EPA n 13, DHA n 16, LA n 11). Compared with the LA group, GDS scores improved in the EPA (P = 0·04) and DHA (P = 0·01) groups and verbal fluency (Initial Letter Fluency) in the DHA group (P = 0·04). Improved GDS scores were correlated with increased DHA plus EPA (r 0·39,P = 0·02). Improved self-reported physical health was associated with increased DHA. There were no treatment effects on other cognitive or QOL parameters. Increased intakes of DHA and EPA benefited mental health in older people with MCI. Increasing n-3 PUFA intakes may reduce depressive symptoms and the risk of progressing to dementia. This needs to be investigated in larger, depressed samples with MCI.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0007114511004788

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sinn, N., Milte, C. M., Street, S. J., Buckley, J. D., Coates, A. M., Petkov, J., & Howe, P. R. C.
Affiliations
  • University of South Australia (AU)
  • Queensland University of Technology (AU)
Venue
British Journal of Nutrition
Published
2011-09-20
Volume
107
Issue
11
Pages
1682-1693
ISSN
  • 0007-1145 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2662
OpenAlex
W2147140002
Cited by
297
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 7
FWCI
19.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal Of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) (submittedVersion)
  • UniSA Research Outputs Repository (University of South Australia) (submittedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Fatty Acid Research and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
Keywords
omega-3 fatty acids, eicosapentaenoic acid, docosahexaenoic acid, depressive symptoms, mild cognitive impairment, quality of life, memory, executive function, older adults, dietary supplementation, linoleic acid, erythrocyte fatty acids, verbal fluency, dementia risk
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Australia, Cognition Disorders, Depression, Docosahexaenoic Acids, Erythrocytes, Female, Fish Oils, Humans, Male, Memory Disorders, Patient Dropouts, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Quality of Life, Severity of Illness Index, Speech Disorders, Eicosapentaenoic Acid, Fatty Acids, Omega-3, Dietary Supplements, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review