Cited by 856Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsNMR spectroscopy and applications

Composite hindered and restricted model of diffusion (CHARMED) MR imaging of the human brain

Assaf, Yaniv, Basser, Peter J.·2005·NeuroImage

Abstract

High b value diffusion-weighted images sampled at high angular resolution were analyzed using a composite hindered and restricted model of diffusion (CHARMED). Measurements and simulations of diffusion in white matter using CHARMED provide an unbiased estimate of fiber orientation with consistently smaller angular uncertainty than when calculated using a DTI model or with a dual tensor model for any given signal-to-noise level. Images based on the population fraction of the restricted compartment provide a new contrast mechanism that enhances white matter like DTI. Nevertheless, it is assumed that these images might be more sensitive than DTI to white matter disorders. We also provide here an experimental design and analysis framework to implement CHARMED MRI that is feasible on human clinical scanners.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.03.042

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Standard Model framework underlies, or is closely related to, several influential models and approaches, including CHARMED, AxCaliber, NODDI, WMTI, SMT, and related multi-compartment formulations.

    “This framework underlies, or is closely related to, several influential models and approaches, including CHARMED, AxCaliber, NODDI, WMTI, SMT, and related multi-compartment formulations (Assaf & Basser, 2005; Assaf et al., 2008; Zhang et al., 2012).”

    From 40 Years of diffusion MRI in the brain: From history to emerging frontiers (2026) · cites this paper as Assaf & Basser, 2005

  • CHARMED and AxCaliber were influential early attempts to estimate restricted fractions and axon caliber distributions from diffusion data.

    “CHARMED and AxCaliber were influential early attempts to estimate restricted fractions and axon caliber distributions from diffusion data (Assaf & Basser, 2005; Assaf et al., 2008).”

    From 40 Years of diffusion MRI in the brain: From history to emerging frontiers (2026) · cites this paper as Assaf & Basser, 2005

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Assaf, Y., & Basser, P. J.
Affiliations
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Assaf, Yaniv
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-08
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
48-58
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2147927529
Cited by
856
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 74 · 2020: 58 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 57 · 2017: 71 · 2016: 46 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 31
FWCI
10.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Tel Aviv University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › NMR spectroscopy and applications
Keywords
diffusion-weighted imaging, white matter fiber orientation, high angular resolution diffusion imaging, white matter disease, human brain
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Brain, Brain Mapping, Computer Simulation, Corpus Callosum, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Nerve Fibers, Models, Statistical, Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review