Cited by 334Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesCognitive Abilities and TestingNeurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

Neural correlates of cognitive efficiency

Rypma, Bart, Berger, Jeffrey S., Prabhakaran, Vivek, Martin Bly, Benjamin, Kimberg, Daniel Y., Biswal, Bharat B., D'Esposito, Mark·2006·NeuroImage

Abstract

Since its inception, experimental psychology has sought to account for individual differences in human performance. Some neuroimaging research, involving complex behavioral paradigms, has suggested that faster-performing individuals show greater neural activity than slower performers. Other research has suggested that faster-performing individuals show less neural activity than slower performers. To examine the neural basis of individual performance differences, we had participants perform a simple speeded-processing task during fMRI scanning. In some prefrontal cortical (PFC) brain regions, faster performers showed less cortical activity than slower performers while in other PFC and parietal regions they showed greater activity. Regional-causality analysis indicated that PFC exerted more influence over other brain regions for slower than for faster individuals. These results suggest that a critical determinant of individual performance differences is the efficiency of interactions between brain regions and that slower individuals may require more prefrontal executive control than faster individuals to perform successfully.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.05.065

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • At a given level of task complexity, individuals with higher ability display more focal and less diffuse brain activity than those with lower ability.

    “At a given level of task complexity, individuals with higher ability display more focal and less diffuse brain activity than those with lower ability”

    From School Readiness and Self-Regulation: A Developmental Psychobiological Approach (2015) · cites this paper as Rypma et al. 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rypma, B., Berger, J. S., Prabhakaran, V., Martin Bly, B., Kimberg, D. Y., Biswal, B. B., & D'Esposito, M.
Affiliations
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • Temple University (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey (US)
Corresponding author
Rypma, Bart
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-11
Volume
33
Issue
3
Pages
969-979
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2017185691
Cited by
334
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 21
FWCI
7.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R03MH061636, MH61636)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Keywords
individual differences in performance, cognitive efficiency, prefrontal cortex, parietal cortex, executive function, brain network interactions
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Algorithms, Brain Mapping, Cognition, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neurons, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review