Cited by 68Visual perception and processing mechanismsNeural dynamics and brain functionNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Contrast gain control and horizontal interactions in V1: A DCM study

Open access
Pinotsis, D.A., Brunet, N., Bastos, A., Bosman, C.A., Litvak, V., Fries, P., Friston, K.J.·2014·NeuroImage

Abstract

Using high-density electrocorticographic recordings - from awake-behaving monkeys - and dynamic causal modelling, we characterised contrast dependent gain control in visual cortex, in terms of synaptic rate constants and intrinsic connectivity. Specifically, we used neural field models to quantify the balance of excitatory and inhibitory influences; both in terms of the strength and spatial dispersion of horizontal intrinsic connections. Our results allow us to infer that increasing contrast increases the sensitivity or gain of superficial pyramidal cells to inputs from spiny stellate populations. Furthermore, changes in the effective spatial extent of horizontal coupling nuance the spatiotemporal filtering properties of cortical laminae in V1 - effectively preserving higher spatial frequencies. These results are consistent with recent non-invasive human studies of contrast dependent changes in the gain of pyramidal cells elaborating forward connections - studies designed to test specific hypotheses about precision and gain control based on predictive coding. Furthermore, they are consistent with established results showing that the receptive fields of V1 units shrink with increasing visual contrast.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.01.047

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Computational modeling studies have shown the plausibility of superficial gamma circuits to engage in prediction error computations.

    “In addition, computational modeling studies have shown the plausibility of superficial gamma circuits to engage in prediction error computations (38, 41, 42).”

    From Layer and rhythm specificity for predictive routing (2020) · cites this paper as [42]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Bastos, A.M., PhD Thesis, University of California Davis (2013)
  2. Chavane, 2011, Lateral spread of orientation selectivity in V1 is controlled by intracortical cooperativity, Front. Syst. Neurosci., 5

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pinotsis, D. A., Brunet, N., Bastos, A., Bosman, C. A., Litvak, V., Fries, P., & Friston, K. J.
Affiliations
  • Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
  • Max Planck Society (DE)
Corresponding author
Pinotsis, D.A.
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-05
Volume
92
Pages
143-155
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2081402846
Cited by
68
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5
FWCI
5.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust
  • European Commission (HEALTH-F2-2008-200728)
  • National Science Foundation
  • European Science Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
contrast gain control, primary visual cortex, horizontal connectivity, dynamic causal modeling, neural field models, excitation-inhibition balance, spiny stellate cells, pyramidal neurons, receptive field size, spatial frequency filtering, predictive coding, electrocorticography, macaque visual cortex
MeSH terms
Animals, Attention, Computer Simulation, Electroencephalography, Macaca mulatta, Male, Models, Neurological, Nerve Net, Neural Inhibition, Visual Cortex, Visual Fields, Contrast Sensitivity, Pyramidal Cells, Connectome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review