Cited by 57Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDeath, Funerary Practices, and Mourning

Disrupted prefrontal activity during emotion processing in complicated grief: An fMRI investigation

Open access
Arizmendi, Brian, Kaszniak, Alfred W., O'Connor, Mary-Frances·2016·NeuroImage

Abstract

Complicated Grief, marked by a persistent and intrusive grief lasting beyond the expected period of adaptation, is associated with a relative inability to disengage from idiographic loss-relevant stimuli (O'Connor and Arizmendi, 2014). In other populations, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies investigating the neural networks associated with this bias consistently implicate the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) during emotion regulation. In the present study, twenty-eight older adults were categorized into three groups based on grief severity: Complicated Grief (n=8), Non-Complicated Grief (n=9), and Nonbereaved, married controls (n=11). Using a block design, all participants completed 8 blocks (20 stimuli per block) of the ecStroop task during fMRI data acquisition. Differences in neural activity during grief-related (as opposed to neutral) stimuli across groups were examined. Those with Complicated Grief showed an absence of increased rostral ACC (rACC) and fronto-cortical recruitment relative to Nonbereaved controls. Activity in the orbitofrontal cortex (x=6, y=54, z=-10) was significantly elevated in the Non-Complicated Grief group when compared to Nonbereaved controls. Post hoc analysis evidenced activity in the dorsal ACC in the Complicated Grief and Nonbereaved groups late in the task. These findings, supported by behavioral data, suggest a relative inability to recruit the regions necessary for successful completion of this emotional task in those with Complicated Grief. This deficit was not observed in recruitment of the orbitofrontal cortex and the rACC during processing of idiographic semantic stimuli in Non-Complicated Grief.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.09.054

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Affected brain areas in prolonged grief disorder include the amygdala, the orbitofrontal cortex, the subgenual anterior cingulate cortex, the nucleus accumbens and the insula.

    “Affected areas include the amygdala, the orbitofrontal cortex, the subgenual anterior cingulate cortex, the nucleus accumbens and the insula 96-101 .”

    From Emerging experience with selected new categories in the <scp>ICD</scp>‐11: complex <scp>PTSD</scp>, prolonged grief disorder, gaming disorder, and compulsive sexual behaviour disorder (2022) · cites this paper as [101]

    The Results report orbitofrontal differences and greater insula activation in the non-complicated-grief group than in the complicated-grief group; the Introduction also reports nucleus accumbens activity in adults with complicated grief. The copy does not identify the subgenual anterior cingulate as affected, and its amygdala finding concerns acutely bereaved people who were not assessed for complicated grief. The five-area list is therefore only partly supported. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arizmendi, B., Kaszniak, A. W., & O'Connor, M.-F.
Affiliations
University of Arizona (US)
Corresponding author
Arizmendi, Brian
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-01
Volume
124
Issue
Pt A
Pages
968-976
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1818059334
Cited by
57
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1
FWCI
4.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (K01AG028404)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
Keywords
complicated grief, emotional processing, prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, rostral anterior cingulate cortex, dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, orbitofrontal cortex, older adults
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Attention, Brain Mapping, Emotions, Female, Grief, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Nerve Net, Neuropsychological Tests, Recruitment, Neurophysiological, Prefrontal Cortex, Stroop Test

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review