Cited by 39Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Distinct neural mechanisms of emotional processing in prolonged grief disorder

Bryant, Richard A., Andrew, Elpiniki, Korgaonkar, Mayuresh S.·2021·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

Background: Prolonged grief disorder (PGD) has recently been recognized as a separate psychiatric diagnosis, despite controversy over the extent to which it is distinctive from posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and major depressive disorder (MDD). Methods: This study investigated distinctive neural processes underpinning emotion processing in participants with PGD, PTSD, and MDD with functional magnetic resonance study of 117 participants that included PGD (n = 21), PTSD (n = 45), MDD (n = 26), and bereaved controls (BC) (n = 25). Neural responses were measured across the brain while sad, happy, or neutral faces were presented at both supraliminal and subliminal levels. Results: PGD had greater activation in the pregenual anterior cingulate cortex (pgACC), bilateral insula, bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortices and right caudate and also greater pgACC–right pallidum connectivity relative to BC during subliminal processing of happy faces. PGD was distinct relative to both PTSD and MDD groups with greater recruitment of the medial orbitofrontal cortex during supraliminal processing of sad faces. PGD were also distinct relative to MDD (but not PTSD) with greater activation in the left amygdala, caudate, and putamen during subliminal presentation of sad faces. There was no distinction between PGD, PTSD, and MDD during processing of happy faces. Conclusions: These results provide initial evidence of distinct neural profiles of PGD relative to related psychopathological conditions, and highlight activation of neural regions implicated in reward networks. This pattern of findings validates current models of PGD that emphasize the roles of yearning and appetitive processes in PGD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291719003507

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bryant, R. A., Andrew, E., & Korgaonkar, M. S.
Affiliations
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Bryant, Richard A.
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2020-01-07
Volume
51
Issue
4
Pages
587-595
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2999268223
Cited by
39
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
prolonged grief disorder, emotional processing, post-traumatic stress disorder, major depressive disorder, bereavement, pregenual anterior cingulate cortex, insula, medial orbitofrontal cortex, amygdala, caudate nucleus, globus pallidus, reward network, longing, neural mechanisms
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Amygdala, Cerebral Cortex, Major Depressive Disorder, Emotions, Facial Expression, Female, Grief, Gyrus Cinguli, Happiness, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Putamen, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Prefrontal Cortex, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review