Cited by 219Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthMental Health Research TopicsDeath, Funerary Practices, and Mourning

Network analysis of persistent complex bereavement disorder in conjugally bereaved adults.

Open access
Robinaugh, Donald J., LeBlanc, Nicole J., Vuletich, Heidi A., McNally, Richard J.·2014·Journal of Abnormal Psychology

Abstract

Persistent complex bereavement disorder (PCBD) is a bereavement-specific syndrome characterized by prolonged and impairing grief. Most research on this syndrome rests on the traditional latent variable model, whereby symptoms reflect an underlying entity. The network (or causal system) approach offers an alternative framework for understanding PCBD that does not suffer from limitations inherent in the latent entity approach. The network approach to psychopathology conceptualizes the relation between symptoms and disorder as mereological, not reflective. That is, symptoms do not reflect an inferred, unobservable category or dimension, but rather are themselves constitutive of the disorder. Accordingly, we propose that PCBD constitutes a causal system of mutually reinforcing symptoms that arise following the death of a loved one and settle into a pathological equilibrium. In this study, we used data from the Changing Lives of Older Couples database to identify symptoms central to PCBD, to distinguish the PCBD network from an overlapping but distinct network of depression symptoms, and to examine how previously identified risk factors may contribute to the maintenance or development of PCBD. Together, these findings provide an important first step toward understanding the nature and etiology of the PCBD network.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/abn0000002

Cites

63 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Network-analytic studies have converged on the conclusion that yearning for the deceased and associated emotional pain have a cascading effect on other symptoms.

    “studies using network-analytic approaches to model the centrality of prolonged grief disorder symptoms have converged on the conclusion that yearning for the deceased and associated emotional pain have a cascading effect on other symptoms 53,54 .”

    From Emerging experience with selected new categories in the <scp>ICD</scp>‐11: complex <scp>PTSD</scp>, prolonged grief disorder, gaming disorder, and compulsive sexual behaviour disorder (2022) · cites this paper as [53]

    The Discussion (page unavailable in our copy) identifies emotional pain as the most central symptom and suggests that yearning and emotional pain may participate in symptom feedback loops. But the Results explicitly say that the network’s directional arrows do not imply causality, and the proposed yearning loop is described as speculative. This paper therefore does not establish the claimed cascading effect as a conclusion. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Burke LA Neimeyer RA 2013 Prospective risk factors for complicated grief Stroebe M Shchut H van den Bout J Complicated grief: Scientific foundations for health care professionals New York NY Routledge

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Robinaugh, D. J., LeBlanc, N. J., Vuletich, H. A., & McNally, R. J.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Psychology
Published
2014-08
Volume
123
Issue
3
Pages
510-522
ISSN
  • 0021-843X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1846
OpenAlex
W2003880706
Cited by
219
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 1
FWCI
23.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Abnormal Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Nancy Pritzker Research Network
  • National Institute of Aging (P1 AG05561-01)
  • Sponsor name not included
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
Keywords
prolonged grief disorder, network analysis, bereavement, depressive symptoms, symptom networks, causal systems, risk factors
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Bereavement, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Risk Factors, Spouses

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review