Cited by 2,356Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsNeural dynamics and brain function

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 252 of the 254 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sleep and the Price of Plasticity: From Synaptic and Cellular Homeostasis to Memory Consolidation and Integration

Open access

Abstract

Summary Sleep is universal, tightly regulated, and its loss impairs cognition. But why does the brain need to disconnect from the environment for hours every day? The synaptic homeostasis hypothesis (SHY) proposes that sleep is the price the brain pays for plasticity. During a waking episode, learning statistical regularities about the current environment requires strengthening connections throughout the brain. This increases cellular needs for energy and supplies, decreases signal-to-noise ratios, and saturates learning. During sleep, spontaneous activity renormalizes net synaptic strength and restores cellular homeostasis. Activity-dependent down-selection of synapses can also explain the benefits of sleep on memory acquisition, consolidation, and integration. This happens through the off-line, comprehensive sampling of statistical regularities incorporated in neuronal circuits over a lifetime. This review considers the rationale and evidence for SHY and points to open issues related to sleep and plasticity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.12.025

Cites

252 of 252 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 254 references

2 of the 254 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 1,001–1,008 of 1,008

Metadata

Authors
Tononi, G., & Cirelli, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin System (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
  • Tononi, Giulio
  • Cirelli, Chiara
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-01
Volume
81
Issue
1
Pages
12-34
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1977647750
Cited by
2,356
References
254
Citations by year
2026: 211 · 2025: 247 · 2024: 194 · 2023: 265 · 2022: 196 · 2021: 185 · 2020: 225 · 2019: 228 · 2018: 149 · 2017: 142 · 2016: 127 · 2015: 126 · 2014: 57
FWCI
14.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH099231, R01MH091326)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
sleep, synaptic homeostasis hypothesis, synaptic plasticity, cellular homeostasis, memory consolidation, memory integration, signal-to-noise ratio, learning, spontaneous neuronal activity
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Homeostasis, Humans, Learning, Neuronal Plasticity, Sleep, Synapses

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review