Cited by 13Memory and Neural MechanismsNeural Networks and ApplicationsNeural dynamics and brain function

Neuroplasticity Meets Artificial Intelligence: A Hippocampus-Inspired Approach to the Stability–Plasticity Dilemma

Open access
Rudroff, Thorsten, Rainio, Oona, Klén, Riku·2024·Brain Sciences

Abstract

The stability–plasticity dilemma remains a critical challenge in developing artificial intelligence (AI) systems capable of continuous learning. This perspective paper presents a novel approach by drawing inspiration from the mammalian hippocampus–cortex system. We elucidate how this biological system’s ability to balance rapid learning with long-term memory retention can inspire novel AI architectures. Our analysis focuses on key mechanisms, including complementary learning systems and memory consolidation, with emphasis on recent discoveries about sharp-wave ripples and barrages of action potentials. We propose innovative AI designs incorporating dual learning rates, offline consolidation, and dynamic plasticity modulation. This interdisciplinary approach offers a framework for more adaptive AI systems while providing insights into biological learning. We present testable predictions and discuss potential implementations and implications of these biologically inspired principles. By bridging neuroscience and AI, our perspective aims to catalyze advancements in both fields, potentially revolutionizing AI capabilities while deepening our understanding of neural processes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/brainsci14111111

Cites

61 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Current AI systems employ binary retention strategies that either preserve everything within their capacity or lose it entirely.

    “current AI systems employ binary retention strategies that either preserve everything within their capacity or lose it entirely [16, 17].”

    From FadeMem: Biologically-Inspired Forgetting for Efficient Agent Memory (2026) · cites this paper as [17]

    Section 3, “Current Challenges in AI: Catastrophic Forgetting” (page unavailable), says traditional neural networks can rapidly overwrite previously acquired knowledge when learning new tasks. It does not describe retention as binary or say AI systems preserve everything within capacity or lose it entirely; the same section describes methods that selectively protect or reinforce prior knowledge. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [17]Schaul T. Quan J. Antonoglou I. Silver D. Prioritized experience replay arXiv 2015 1511.05952
  2. [52]Han S. Pool J. Tran J. Dally W. Learning both weights and connections for efficient neural network Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 2015 28 1135 1143
  3. [56]Marcus G. Deep learning: A critical appraisal arXiv 2018 1801.00631
  4. [64]Brown T.B. Mann B. Ryder N. Subbiah M. Kaplan J. Dhariwal P. Neelakantan A. Shyam P. Sastry G. Askell A. Language models are few-shot learners arXiv 2020 2005.14165

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rudroff, T., Rainio, O., & Klén, R.
Affiliations
University of Turku (FI)
Corresponding author
Rudroff, Thorsten
Venue
Brain Sciences
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2024-10-31
Volume
14
Issue
11
Pages
1111
ISSN
2076-3425 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4403950449
Cited by
11
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6
FWCI
2.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UTUPub (University of Turku) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
stability-plasticity dilemma, hippocampus, complementary learning systems, memory consolidation, sharp-wave ripples, offline consolidation, neuroplasticity, continuous learning, long-term memory retention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review