Cited by 140Pain Mechanisms and TreatmentsDermatology and Skin DiseasesIon Channels and Receptors

Identification of a Spinal Circuit for Mechanical and Persistent Spontaneous Itch

Open access
Pan, Haili, Fatima, Mahar, Li, Alan, Lee, Hankyu, Cai, Wei, Horwitz, Lorraine, Hor, Chia Chun, Zaher, Nizam +5 more·2019·Neuron

Abstract

Lightly stroking the lips or gently poking some skin regions can evoke mechanical itch in healthy human subjects. Sensitization of mechanical itch and persistent spontaneous itch are intractable symptoms in chronic itch patients. However, the underlying neural circuits are not well defined. We identified a subpopulation of excitatory interneurons expressing Urocortin 3::Cre (Ucn3+) in the dorsal spinal cord as a central node in the pathway that transmits acute mechanical itch and mechanical itch sensitization as well as persistent spontaneous itch under chronic itch conditions. This population receives peripheral inputs from Toll-like receptor 5-positive (TLR5+) Aβ low-threshold mechanoreceptors and is directly innervated by inhibitory interneurons expressing neuropeptide Y::Cre (NPY+) in the dorsal spinal cord. Reduced synaptic inhibition and increased intrinsic excitability of Ucn3+ neurons lead to chronic itch sensitization. Our study sheds new light on the neural basis of chronic itch and unveils novel avenues for developing mechanism-specific therapeutic advancements.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.06.016

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pan, H., Fatima, M., Li, A., Lee, H., Cai, W., Horwitz, L., Hor, C. C., Zaher, N., Cin, M., Slade, H., Huang, T., Xu, X. Z. S., & Duan, B.
Affiliations
  • Nanchang University (CN)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Duan, Bo
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-09
Volume
103
Issue
6
Pages
1135-1149.e6
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2960539136
Cited by
140
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 4
FWCI
10.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Michigan
  • National Institutes of Health (R01NS109170)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Ion Channels and Receptors
Keywords
chronic pruritus, pruritus, dorsal spinal cord, urocortin 3, TLR5, neuropeptide Y, inhibitory interneurons, synaptic inhibition, intrinsic excitability, neural circuits
MeSH terms
Animals, Interneurons, Mechanoreceptors, Neural Inhibition, Neural Pathways, Neuropeptide Y, Physical Stimulation, Pruritus, Skin, Spinal Cord, Glutamic Acid, Toll-Like Receptor 5, Mice, Urocortins, Central Nervous System Sensitization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review