Cited by 68Pain Mechanisms and TreatmentsCannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchPain Management and Treatment

The synthetic cannabinoids attenuate allodynia and hyperalgesia in a rat model of trigeminal neuropathic pain

Liang, Ying-Ching, Huang, Chiung-Chun, Hsu, Kuei-Sen·2007·Neuropharmacology

Abstract

Trigeminal neuralgia is a disorder of paroxysmal and severely disabling facial pain and continues to be a real therapeutic challenge. At present there are few effective drugs. Here we have evaluated the effects of the synthetic cannabinoid WIN 55,212-2 on mechanical allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia in a rat model of trigeminal neuropathic pain produced by a chronic constriction injury (CCI) of the infraorbital branch of the trigeminal nerve (ION). Relative to sham operation controls, rats with the CCI-ION consistently displayed hyperresponsiveness to von Frey filament and heat stimulation of the vibrissal pad. Both mechanical allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia are seen both ipsilateral and contralateral to the side of nerve injury, but is significantly more severe ipsilaterally. Administration of WIN 55,212-2 (0.3-5 mg/kg i.p.) dose-dependently increased the mechanical and heat withdrawal thresholds. WIN 55,212-2 (0.3-3 mg/kg i.p.) produced no significant motor deficits in animals using the rotarod test. The effect of WIN 55,212-2 was mimicked by cannabinoid CB1 receptor agonist HU 210 and was antagonized by CB1 receptor antagonist AM 251, but not by CB2 receptor antagonist AM 630 or vanilloid receptor 1 antagonist capsazepine, suggesting the involvement of CB1 receptors. CCI-ION also induced a time-dependent upregulation of CB1 receptors primarily within the ipsilateral superficial laminae of the trigeminal caudal nucleus revealed by both Western blot and immunohistochemistry. Taken together, these results suggest that cannabinoids may be a useful therapeutic approach for the clinical management of trigeminal neuropathic pain disorders.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2007.04.019

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • High antihyperalgesic doses of WIN55,212-2 decreased rotarod latencies and body temperature, whereas HU210 at the low dose used had no effect on these dependent measures.

    “High antihyperalgesic doses of WIN55,212-2 decreased rotarod latencies and body temperature, whereas HU210, at the singular low dose used (10 μg/kg), had no effect on these dependent measures.”
  • WIN55,212-2 and HU-210 increased mechanical withdrawal responses and thermal withdrawal latencies on the ipsilateral side of the head in the CCI-ION model.

    “WIN55,212-2 and HU-210 increased mechanical withdrawal responses and thermal withdrawal latencies on the ipsilateral side of the head in this model.94”
  • WIN55,212-2 was more efficacious in suppressing mechanical allodynia vs. thermal hyperalgesia in the CCI-ION model.

    “WIN55,212-2 was more efficacious in suppressing mechanical allodynia vs. thermal hyperalgesia in the CCI-ION model.”
  • CB1 receptor upregulation was observed in both the ipsilateral and contralateral superficial layer of the trigeminal caudal nucleus, and this effect was greater on the ipsilateral side.

    “CB1 receptor upregulation was observed in both the ipsilateral and contralateral superficial layer of the trigeminal caudal nucleus, and this effect was greater on the ipsilateral side.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liang, Y.-C., Huang, C.-C., & Hsu, K.-S.
Affiliations
National Cheng Kung University (TW)
Corresponding author
Hsu, Kuei-Sen
Venue
Neuropharmacology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-07
Volume
53
Issue
1
Pages
169-177
ISSN
0028-3908 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2092496616
Cited by
68
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuropharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
Keywords
synthetic cannabinoids, WIN 55,212-2, trigeminal neuropathic pain, trigeminal neuralgia, chronic constriction injury, infraorbital nerve, mechanical allodynia, thermal hyperalgesia, CB1 receptor, HU-210, AM251, capsazepine, cannabinoid therapy
MeSH terms
Analgesics, Analysis of Variance, Animals, Cannabinoids, Disease Models, Animal, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Hyperalgesia, Hyperesthesia, Indoles, Functional Laterality, Male, Morpholines, Naphthalenes, Pain Measurement, Piperidines, Pyrazoles, Reaction Time, Time Factors, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Pain Threshold, Trigeminal Nerve Diseases, Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1, Benzoxazines, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review