CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 131Neuroscience and Music PerceptionNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismAnimal Vocal Communication and Behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 101 of the 101 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neural networks involved in voluntary and involuntary vocal pitch regulation in experienced singers

Zarate, Jean Mary, Wood, Sean, Zatorre, Robert J.·2010·Neuropsychologia
DOI 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.10.025
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In an fMRI experiment, we tested experienced singers with singing tasks to investigate neural correlates of voluntary and involuntary vocal pitch regulation. We shifted the pitch of auditory feedback (+/-25 or 200 cents), and singers either: (1) ignored the shift and maintained their vocal pitch or (2) changed their vocal pitch to compensate for the shift. In our previous study, singers successfully ignored and compensated for 200-cent shifts; in the present experiment, we hypothesized that singers would be less able to ignore 25-cent shifts, due to a prepotent, corrective pitch-shift response. We expected that voluntary vocal regulation during compensate tasks would recruit the anterior portion of the rostral cingulate zone (RCZa) and posterior superior temporal sulcus (pSTS), as our earlier study reported; however, we predicted that a different network may be engaged during involuntary responses to 25-cent shifts. Singers were less able to ignore 25-cent shifts than 200-cent shifts, suggesting that pitch-shift responses to small shifts are under less voluntary control than responses to larger shifts. While we did not find neural activity specifically associated with involuntary pitch-shift responses, compensate tasks recruited a functionally connected network consisting of RCZa, pSTS, and anterior insula. Analyses of stimulus-modulated functional connectivity suggest that pSTS and intraparietal sulcus may monitor auditory feedback to extract pitch-shift direction in 200-cent tasks, but not in 25-cent tasks, which suggests that larger vocal corrections are under cortical control. During the compensate tasks, the pSTS may interact with the RCZa and anterior insula before voluntary vocal pitch correction occurs.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.10.025

Cites

101 of 101 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Lombard, 1911, Le signe de l’elevation de la voix, Annales maladies oreille larynx nez pharynx, 37, 101

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 131

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Zarate, J. M., Wood, S., & Zatorre, R. J.
Affiliations
  • Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital (CA)
  • International Laboratory for Brain, Music and Sound Research (CA)
Corresponding author
Zarate, Jean Mary
ORCID
Venue
Neuropsychologia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-01
Volume
48
Issue
2
Pages
607-618
ISSN
0028-3932 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.10.025
OpenAlex
W2013189479
Cited by
131
References
101
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 10
FWCI
2.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Neuropsychologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • the Eileen Peters McGill Majors Fellowship
  • the Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Music Media and Technology
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
Keywords
singing, auditory feedback, volitional control, posterior superior temporal sulcus, anterior insula, intraparietal sulcus, functional connectivity, pitch perception, prepotent response
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Auditory Pathways, Biofeedback, Psychology, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Music, Nerve Net, Oxygen, Pitch Perception, Speech Acoustics, Voice, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review