Cited by 105Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeuroendocrine regulation and behaviorMemory and Neural Mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The human amygdala is necessary for developing and expressing normal interpersonal trust

Open access
Koscik, Timothy R., Tranel, Daniel·2011·Neuropsychologia

Abstract

The human amygdala is known to be involved in processing social, emotional, and reward-related information. Previous reports have indicated that the amygdala is involved in extracting trustworthiness information from faces. Interestingly, functional neuroimaging research using economic tasks that presumably require developing and/or expressing interpersonal trust, such as the Trust Game (TG), have not routinely identified involvement of the amygdala. The present study sought to explore the role of the amygdala in developing and expressing interpersonal trust, via a multi-round, multiplayer economic exchange, a version of the TG, in a large sample of participants with focal brain damage. Participants with unilateral damage to the amygdala displayed increased benevolent behavior in the TG, and specifically, they tended to increase trust in response to betrayals. On the other hand, neurologically normal adults tended to repay trust in kind, i.e., they decreased interpersonal trust in response to betrayals or increased trust in response to increases from others. Comparison participants, with brain damage that does not include the amygdala, ventromedial prefrontal or insular cortices, tended to behave ambivalently to the expressed trust or betrayal of others. Our data suggest that the amygdala is necessary for developing and expressing normal interpersonal trust. This increased tendency to behave benevolently in response to defections from others may be related to the abnormal social behavior observed in this group. Moreover, increased benevolence may increase the likelihood or opportunity to be taken advantage of by others.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.09.023

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 14 references

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Baumgartner, 2008, Oxytocin shapes the neural circuitry of trust and trust adaptation in humans, Neuron, 58, 639, 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.04.009 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Cahill, 2004, Sex-related hemispheric lateralization of amygdala function in emotionally influenced memory: An fMRI investigation, Learning & Memory, 11, 261, 10.1101/lm.70504 · DOI
  3. Croson, 1999, Gender and culture: International experimental evidence from trust games, American Economic Review, 89, 386, 10.1257/aer.89.2.386 · DOI
  4. Delgado, 2005, An fMRI study of reward-related probability learning, Neuroimage, 24, 862, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.10.002 · DOI
  5. Emery, 2001, The effects of bilateral lesions of the amygdala on dyadic social interactions in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta), Behavioral Neuroscience, 115, 515, 10.1037/0735-7044.115.3.515 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Engell, 2007, Implicit trustworthiness decisions: Automatic coding of face properties in the human amygdala, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 1508, 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.9.1508 · DOI
  7. Grezes, 2006, Amygdala activation when one is the target of deceit: Did he lie to you or to someone else?, Neuroimage, 30, 601, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.09.038 · DOI
  8. Grezes, 2004, Brain mechanisms for inferring deceit in the actions of others, Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 5500, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0219-04.2004 · DOI
  9. Hsu, 2005, Neural systems responding to degrees of uncertainty in human decision-making, Science, 310, 1680, 10.1126/science.1115327 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Kennedy, 2009, Personal space regulation by the human amygdala, Nature Neuroscience, 12, 1226, 10.1038/nn.2381 · DOI · Paper page
  11. King-Casas, 2005, Getting to know you: Reputation and trust in a two-person economic exchange, Science, 308, 78, 10.1126/science.1108062 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Kirsch, 2005, Oxytocin modulates neural circuitry for social cognition and fear in humans, Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 11489, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3984-05.2005 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Kluver, 1937, Psychic blindness and other symptoms following bilateral temporal lobectomy in rhesus monkeys, American Journal of Physiology, 119, 352
  14. Koscik, 2010, Sex-related functional asymmetry in the limbic brain, Neuropsychopharmacology: Official Publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 35, 340, 10.1038/npp.2009.122 · DOI
  15. Krueger, 2007, Neural correlates of trust, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 20084, 10.1073/pnas.0710103104 · DOI
  16. Li, 2009, Neural responses to sanction threats in two-party economic exchange, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 16835, 10.1073/pnas.0908855106 · DOI
  17. McCabe, 2001, A functional imaging study of cooperation in two-person reciprocal exchange, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98, 11832, 10.1073/pnas.211415698 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Platek, 2009, Implicit trustworthiness ratings of self-resembling faces activate brain centers involved in reward, Neuropsychologia, 47, 289, 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.07.018 · DOI
  19. Rilling, 2007, Neural correlates of social cooperation and non-cooperation as a function of psychopathy, Biological Psychiatry, 61, 1260, 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.07.021 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Rilling, 2008, The neural correlates of the affective response to unreciprocated cooperation, Neuropsychologia, 46, 1256, 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.11.033 · DOI
  21. Said, 2009, Nonlinear amygdala response to face trustworthiness: Contributions of high and low spatial frequency information, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 519, 10.1162/jocn.2009.21041 · DOI
  22. Sergerie, 2008, The role of the amygdala in emotional processing: A quantitative meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 32, 811, 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.12.002 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Sripada, 2009, Functional neuroimaging of mentalizing during the trust game in social anxiety disorder, Neuroreport, 20, 984, 10.1097/WNR.0b013e32832d0a67 · DOI
  24. Stein, 2002, Increased amygdala activation to angry and contemptuous faces in generalized social phobia, Archives of General Psychiatry, 59, 1027, 10.1001/archpsyc.59.11.1027 · DOI
  25. Suzuki, 2010, Neural basis of conditional cooperation, Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
  26. Terenzi, 2005, Oxytocin-induced excitation of neurones in the rat central and medial amygdaloid nuclei, Neuroscience, 134, 345, 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.04.004 · DOI
  27. Tranel, 2009, The Iowa-Benton school of neuropsychological assessment, Neuropsychological assessment of neuropsychiatric and neuromedical disorders, 66
  28. Tranel, 2009, Sex-related functional asymmetry of the amygdala: Preliminary evidence using a case-matched lesion approach, Neurocase, 15, 217, 10.1080/13554790902775492 · DOI
  29. Tranel, 2006, Altered experience of emotion following bilateral amygdala damage, Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 11, 219, 10.1080/13546800444000281 · DOI
  30. van den Bos, 2009, What motivates repayment? Neural correlates of reciprocity in the Trust Game, Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 4, 294, 10.1093/scan/nsp009 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 105

Metadata

Authors
Koscik, T. R., & Tranel, D.
Affiliations
University of Iowa (US)
Corresponding author
Koscik, Timothy R.
Venue
Neuropsychologia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-03
Volume
49
Issue
4
Pages
602-611
ISSN
0028-3932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2026386101
Cited by
105
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuropsychologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5p50ns019632-28)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA022549)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (P01NS019632, P50-NS019632, P50NS19632)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
amygdala, interpersonal trust, trust game, betrayal, trustworthiness, social behavior, focal brain injury, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, insula, economic exchange, benevolence, social cognition
MeSH terms
Adult, Amygdala, Brain Damage, Chronic, Female, Games, Experimental, Humans, Imitative Behavior, Interpersonal Relations, Functional Laterality, Male, Reference Values, Social Perception, Case-Control Studies, Beneficence, Trust

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review