Cited by 157Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

The Neural Basis of Following Advice

Open access
Biele, Guido, Rieskamp, Jörg, Krugel, Lea K., Heekeren, Hauke R.·2011·PLoS Biology

Abstract

Learning by following explicit advice is fundamental for human cultural evolution, yet the neurobiology of adaptive social learning is largely unknown. Here, we used simulations to analyze the adaptive value of social learning mechanisms, computational modeling of behavioral data to describe cognitive mechanisms involved in social learning, and model-based functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to identify the neurobiological basis of following advice. One-time advice received before learning had a sustained influence on people's learning processes. This was best explained by social learning mechanisms implementing a more positive evaluation of the outcomes from recommended options. Computer simulations showed that this "outcome-bonus" accumulates more rewards than an alternative mechanism implementing higher initial reward expectation for recommended options. fMRI results revealed a neural outcome-bonus signal in the septal area and the left caudate. This neural signal coded rewards in the absence of advice, and crucially, it signaled greater positive rewards for positive and negative feedback after recommended rather than after non-recommended choices. Hence, our results indicate that following advice is intrinsically rewarding. A positive correlation between the model's outcome-bonus parameter and amygdala activity after positive feedback directly relates the computational model to brain activity. These results advance the understanding of social learning by providing a neurobiological account for adaptive learning from advice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001089

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Value signals in the striatum appear to reflect how we evaluate new information that agrees with or conflicts with advice we have received.

    “and c) how we evaluate new information that agrees with or conflicts with advice we have received (e.g., valuing positive information about an expertly endorsed stock but discounting negative information) 53.”
  • Ventral striatum activity shows a weaker distinction between positive and negative outcomes of advice-based choices compared to outcomes of choices without advice.

    “Ventral striatum activity shows a weaker distinction between positive and negative outcomes of advice-based choices compared to outcomes of choices without advice 53.”
  • People are more likely to stick with an advised choice in the face of negative outcomes.

    “Much like people will stick to a decision when they believe the odds are higher 25, people are more likely to stick with an advised choice in the face of negative outcomes 53.”
  • Biases introduced by social information can affect our experience of outcomes and the way we learn from them.

    “This finding parallels the effect of advice on outcomes of risk decisions 53 and suggests that biases introduced by social information can affect our experience of outcomes and the way we learn from them.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 51 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [48]Van Overwalle F 2009 Social cognition and the brain: a meta-analysis. Human Brain Mapping 30 829 858 18381770 PMC6870808
  2. [49]Krueger F Mccabe K Moll J Kriegeskorte N Zahn R 2007 Neural correlates of trust. PNAS 104 20084 20089 18056800 PMC2148426

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Biele, G., Rieskamp, J., Krugel, L. K., & Heekeren, H. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Oslo (NO)
  • University of Basel (CH)
  • Max Planck Institute for Human Development (DE)
Corresponding author
Biele, Guido
Venue
PLoS Biology
Published
2011-06-21
Volume
9
Issue
6
Pages
e1001089
ISSN
  • 1544-9173 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-7885
OpenAlex
W2098391782
Cited by
157
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 29
FWCI
8.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • edoc (University of Basel) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • edoc (University of Basel)
Funders
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
  • Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
social learning, reward processing, neural basis of learning, septal area, caudate nucleus, amygdala, feedback, computational modeling, cultural evolution
MeSH terms
Brain, Choice Behavior, Computer Simulation, Decision Making, Feedback, Humans, Learning, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Reward

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review