Cited by 17Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsMotor Control and Adaptation

Declarative interference affects off-line processing of motor imagery learning during both sleep and wakefulness

Debarnot, Ursula, Castellani, Eleonora, Guillot, Aymeric, Giannotti, Veronica, Dimarco, Mattia, Sebastiani, Laura·2012·Neurobiology of Learning and Memory

Abstract

Retroactive interference from a declarative memory can prevent the consolidation of motor skill memories over wakefulness, but not over a night of sleep. Recently, motor imagery (MI) learning has been showed to allow for a stronger resistance against procedural interference rather than physical practice, but whether declarative interference might impact sleep-dependent consolidation process of an explicit finger tapping task learned with MI remains unknown. To address this issue, 57 subjects mentally rehearsed an explicit finger tapping sequence, and half of them were then requested to practice an interferential declarative task. All participants were re-tested on the initial procedural task either after a night of sleep or a similar daytime interval. The main findings provided evidence that declarative interference affected MI consolidation both over the night- and wakefulness intervals. These results extend our previous findings by underlying that declarative interference might impact more strongly explicit MI practice than physical practice, hence suggesting that MI might rely on declarative memory rather than exclusively on procedural memory system. The relationship between declarative and procedural memories during MI practice, as well as during off-line consolidation, is discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nlm.2012.10.009

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The competitive interaction between memory systems might extend to processes of consolidation during sleep.

    “Importantly, this competitive interaction between the memory systems might extend to processes of consolidation during sleep (143, 147, 273, 1000).”

    From About Sleep's Role in Memory (2013) · cites this paper as [273]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 62 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Debarnot, U., Castellani, E., Guillot, A., Giannotti, V., Dimarco, M., & Sebastiani, L.
Affiliations
  • Lyon 1 Université (FR)
  • University of Pisa (IT)
Corresponding author
Debarnot, Ursula
Venue
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-11
Volume
98
Issue
4
Pages
361-367
ISSN
1074-7427 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1970153807
Cited by
17
References
62
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurobiology of Learning and Memory (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
Keywords
motor imagery, retroactive interference, sleep-dependent memory consolidation, procedural memory, declarative memory, finger tapping, mental practice, memory interference
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Female, Humans, Imagination, Male, Memory, Movement, Perceptual Masking, Psychomotor Performance, Mental Recall, Retention, Psychology, Sleep, Time Factors, Verbal Learning, Wakefulness, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review