The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Encouraging employees to report unethical conduct internally: It takes a village
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Ethical leadership most powerfully impacts outcomes such as whistle-blowing when followers are focused more on rules than on the consequences of their actions (Bhal & Dadhich, 2011), and ethical teammates may be a necessary precondition for ethical leadership to affect whistle-blowing (Mayer et al., 2013).”
From Taking Stock of Moral Approaches to Leadership: An Integrative Review of Ethical, Authentic, and Servant Leadership (2019) · cites this paper as Mayer et al., 2013
In the citing paper
“Ethical leadership most powerfully impacts outcomes such as whistle-blowing when followers are focused more on rules than on the consequences of their actions (Bhal & Dadhich, 2011), and ethical teammates may be a necessary precondition for ethical leadership to affect whistle-blowing (Mayer et al., 2013).”
From Taking Stock of Moral Approaches to Leadership: An Integrative Review of Ethical, Authentic, and Servant Leadership (2019) · cites this paper as Mayer et al., 2013
In the citing paper
“A compliance culture also mediates ethical leadership's impact on rule compliance and withinorganization whistle-blowing (Mayer, Nurmohamed, Treviño, Shapiro, & Schminke, 2013;Schaubroeck et al., 2012).”
From Taking Stock of Moral Approaches to Leadership: An Integrative Review of Ethical, Authentic, and Servant Leadership (2019) · cites this paper as Mayer, Nurmohamed, Treviño, Shapiro, & Schminke, 2013
Citations
Cites
Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change
Bandura, A. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191 · Cited by 43,925
Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions
(1992) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-3352 · Cited by 36,647
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/brm.40.3.879 · Cited by 34,117
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Festinger, L. (1957) · doi:10.1515/9781503620766 · Cited by 24,241
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Morvan, C., & O’Connor, A. (2017) · Macat Library eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781912282432 · Cited by 18,284
Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams
Edmondson, A. (1999) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2666999 · Cited by 12,026
Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change
Bandura, A. (1978) · Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/0146-6402(78)90002-4 · Cited by 10,586
Addressing Moderated Mediation Hypotheses: Theory, Methods, and Prescriptions
Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273170701341316 · Cited by 9,973
Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical Mediation Analysis in the New Millennium
Hayes, A. F. (2009) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637750903310360 · Cited by 9,757
A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects
MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.7.1.83 · Cited by 9,406
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Ridge, P. S. (2000, May 11). Ethics programs aren’t stemming employee misconduct, a study indicates. Wall Street Journal, p. A1 (column 5).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Smith, C. P., & Freyd, J. J. (2014) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0037564 · Cited by 849
(Un)Ethical Behavior in Organizations
Treviño, L. K., den Nieuwenboer, N. A., & Kish-Gephart, J. J. (2013) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143745 · Cited by 786
Self-citationLemoine, G. J., Hartnell, C. A., & Leroy, H. (2019) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2016.0121 · Cited by 614
Chamberlin, M., Newton, D. W., & Lepine, J. A. (2017) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/peps.12185 · Cited by 532
Ethical leadership: Meta-analytic evidence of criterion-related and incremental validity.
Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2015) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0038246 · Cited by 377
Metadata
- Authors
- Mayer, D. M., Nurmohamed, S., Treviño, L. K., Shapiro, D. L., & Schminke, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- University of Maryland, College Park (US)
- University of Central Florida (US)
- Corresponding author
- Mayer, David M.
- Venue
- Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-05
- Volume
- 121
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 89-103
- ISSN
- 0749-5978 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2130891108
- Cited by
- 244
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6
- FWCI
- 28.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Locations
- Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes (publishedVersion)
- Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Ethics in Business and Education
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Ethics in medical practice
- Keywords
- internal whistleblowing, unethical behavior, social influence, fear of retaliation, organizational ethics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review