The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On tests and indices for evaluating structural models
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124192021002005 · Cited by 27,200
Comparative fit indexes in structural models.
Bentler, P. M. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238 · Cited by 25,266
Self-citationPrinciples and practice in reporting structural equation analyses.
McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M.-H. R. (2002) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.7.1.64 · Cited by 4,734
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- Bentler, P. M. (in press). EQS 6 structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
- Bentler, 1980, Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures, Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588, 10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588 · DOI · Paper page
- Browne, 2002, When fit indices and residuals are incompatible, Psychological Methods, 7, 403, 10.1037/1082-989X.7.4.403 · DOI · Paper page
- Curran, 1996, The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis, Psychological Methods, 1, 16, 10.1037/1082-989X.1.1.16 · DOI · Paper page
- Hu, 1992, Can test statistics in covariance structure analysis be trusted?, Psychological Bulletin, 112, 351, 10.1037/0033-2909.112.2.351 · DOI
- Jöreskog, 1982, Recent developments in structural equation modeling, Journal of Marketing Research, 19, 404, 10.2307/3151714 · DOI
- Lee, 1995, A two-stage estimation of structural equation models with continuous and polytomous variables, British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 48, 339, 10.1111/j.2044-8317.1995.tb01067.x · DOI
- MacCallum, 2003, Working with imperfect models, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 38, 113, 10.1207/S15327906MBR3801_5 · DOI
- MacCallum, 1992, Model modification in covariance structure analysis: The problem of capitalization on chance, Psychological Bulletin, 111, 490, 10.1037/0033-2909.111.3.490 · DOI · Paper page
- Maydeu-Olivares, 2006, A cautionary note on using G2(dif) to assess relative model fit in categorical data analysis, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 41, 55, 10.1207/s15327906mbr4101_4 · DOI
- Schilling, 2005, High-dimensional maximum marginal likelihood item factor analysis by adaptive quadrature, Psychometrika, 70, 1, 10.1007/s11336-003-1141-x · DOI
- Stout, 1990, A new item response theory modeling approach with applications to unidimensionality assessment and ability estimation, Psychometrika, 55, 293, 10.1007/BF02295289 · DOI
- Yuan, 2004, On chi-square difference and z-tests in mean and covariance structure analysis when the base model is misspecified, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64, 737, 10.1177/0013164404264853 · DOI
- Yuan, K.-H., & Bentler, P. M. (in press-a). Structural equation modeling. In C. R. Rao & S. Sinharay (Eds.), Handbook of statistics: Psychometrics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
- Yuan, K.-H., & Bentler, P. M. (in press-b). Robust procedures in structural equation modeling. In S.-Y. Lee (Ed.). Handbook of structural equation models. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Cited by
Putnick, D. L., & Bornstein, M. H. (2016) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004 · Cited by 4,369
“…CFI (Meade et al., 2008; Rutkowski & Svetina, 2014) or the use of other alternative fit indices (e.g., ΔRMSEA, ΔSRMR; Chen, 2007; Meade et al., 2008), and some question the use of alternative fit indices entirely because of their lack of precision (Barrett, 2007; Bentler, 2007; Fan & Sivo, 2009).”
BackgroundReporting practices in confirmatory factor analysis: an overview and some recommendations
Jackson, D. L., Gillaspy, J. A., & Purc-Stephenson, R. (2009) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/a0014694 · Cited by 2,242
Chen, F., Curran, P. J., Bollen, K. A., Kirby, J., & Paxton, P. (2008) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124108314720 · Cited by 1,538
Developmental cognitive neuroscience using latent change score models: A tutorial and applications
Kievit, R. A., Brandmaier, A. M., Ziegler, G., van Harmelen, A.-L., de Mooij, S. M. M., Moutoussis, M., Goodyer, I. M., Bullmore, E., Jones, P. B., Fonagy, P., et al. (2018) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2017.11.007 · Cited by 516
Beyond sacrificial harm: a two-dimensional model of utilitarian psychology
Kahane, G., Everett, J. A. C., Earp, B. D., Caviola, L., Faber, N. S., Crockett, M. J., & Savulescu, J. (2018) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000093 · Cited by 434
Validating a Scale for Citizen Trust in Government Organizations
Grimmelikhuijsen, S., & Knies, E. (2017) · International Review of Administrative Sciences · doi:10.1177/0020852315585950 · Cited by 366
A systematic review of empirical studies examining mechanisms of implementation in health
Lewis, C. C., Boyd, M. R., Walsh-Bailey, C., Lyon, A. R., Beidas, R., Mittman, B., Aarons, G. A., Weiner, B. J., & Chambers, D. A. (2020) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-020-00983-3 · Cited by 363
Ullman, J. B., & Bentler, P. M. (2012) · Handbook of Psychology, Second Edition · doi:10.1002/9781118133880.hop202023 · Cited by 330
Self-citationBenson, N., Hulac, D. M., & Kranzler, J. H. (2010) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/a0017767 · Cited by 309
Validierung einer deutschen Version der Self-Compassion Scale (SCS-D)
Hupfeld, J., & Ruffieux, N. (2011) · Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie · doi:10.1026/1616-3443/a000088 · Cited by 237
Credé, M., & Harms, P. D. (2015) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2008 · Cited by 181
Hanna, F., Oostdam, R., Severiens, S. E., & Zijlstra, B. J. H. (2020) · Studies in Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.100822 · Cited by 138
González-Ramírez, M. T., Rodríguez-Ayán, M. N., & Hernández, R. L. (2013) · The Spanish Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1017/sjp.2013.35 · Cited by 91
Kunze, F., & Menges, J. I. (2017) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2129 · Cited by 77
Wu, K., Zhang, Y., Liu, Z., Zhou, P., & Wei, C. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01043 · Cited by 76
Development and Validation of the Four Facet Mindful Eating Scale (FFaMES)
Carrière, K., Shireen, S. H., Siemers, N., Preißner, C. E., Starr, J., Falk, C., & Knäuper, B. (2022) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2021.105689 · Cited by 47
Trajectories from academic intrinsic motivation to need for cognition and educational attainment
Gottfried, A. E., Nylund-Gibson, K., Gottfried, A. W., Morovati, D., & Gonzalez, A. M. (2017) · The Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00220671.2016.1171199 · Cited by 32
Hawley, L. L., Rogojanski, J., Vorstenbosch, V., Quilty, L. C., Laposa, J. M., & Rector, N. A. (2017) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2017.03.003 · Cited by 31
Maujean, A., Gullo, M. J., Andersen, T. E., Ravn, S. L., & Sterling, M. (2017) · PAIN Reports · doi:10.1097/pr9.0000000000000631 · Cited by 22
Black, J. E., & Barnes, J. L. (2021) · Psychology of Popular Media · doi:10.1037/ppm0000281 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Bentler, P. M.
- Venue
- Personality and Individual Differences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-05
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 825-829
- ISSN
- 0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2006213046
- Cited by
- 852
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 16.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
