Cited by 286Psychology of Moral and Emotional JudgmentSocial and Intergroup PsychologyDeath Anxiety and Social Exclusion

Disgust: a predictor of social conservatism and prejudicial attitudes toward homosexuals

Terrizzi, John A., Shook, Natalie J., Ventis, W. Larry·2010·Personality and Individual Differences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.paid.2010.05.024

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Terrizzi, J. A., Shook, N. J., & Ventis, W. L.
Affiliations
  • Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
  • William & Mary (US)
Corresponding author
Terrizzi, John A.
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-10
Volume
49
Issue
6
Pages
587-592
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2014957841
Cited by
286
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 9
FWCI
4.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Keywords
disgust, social conservatism, behavioral immune system, disgust sensitivity, intergroup attitudes, outgroup attitudes, contamination prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review