Cited by 22Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychometric Methodologies and TestingPersonality Traits and Psychology

Designing a brief measure of social anxiety: Psychometric support for a three-item version of the Interaction Anxiousness Scale (IAS-3)

Nichols, Austin Lee, Webster, Gregory D.·2015·Personality and Individual Differences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.paid.2015.01.043

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Participants completed validated brief versions of common mental health instruments at baseline and 1-month follow-up.

    “Participants were also asked to complete symptom measures including a validated brief version of common mental health instruments, which included the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 [15], Interaction Anxiousness Scale-3 (IAS-3) [16], Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Checklist-4 [17], Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory-4 [18], and Washington Early Recognition Center Affectivity and Psychosis Screen”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nichols, A. L., & Webster, G. D.
Affiliations
  • Universidad de Navarra (ES)
  • University of Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Nichols, Austin Lee
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-06
Volume
79
Pages
110-115
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4231453788
Cited by
22
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
2.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
social anxiety, psychometric validation, item response theory, concurrent validity, test-retest reliability, construct validity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review