Cited by 64Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsAttachment and Relationship DynamicsChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

The Origins of Individual Differences in Dispositional Mindfulness

Pepping, Christopher A., Duvenage, Megan·2016·Personality and Individual Differences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.paid.2015.05.027

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pepping, C. A., & Duvenage, M.
Affiliations
  • La Trobe University (AU)
  • Griffith University (AU)
Corresponding author
Pepping, Christopher A.
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-04
Volume
93
Pages
130-136
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W770151417
Cited by
64
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5
FWCI
4.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
trait mindfulness, individual differences, attachment theory, secure attachment, attachment anxiety, attachment avoidance, parental rejection, parental warmth, parenting quality, early childhood experiences, adolescents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review