Cited by 89Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsAttachment and Relationship DynamicsReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology

The Relationship between Adult Attachment Orientation and Mindfulness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Open access
Stevenson, Jodie C., Emerson, Lisa-Marie, Millings, Abigail·2017·Mindfulness

Abstract

Mindfulness can be measured as an individual trait, which varies between individuals. In recent years, research has investigated the overlap between trait mindfulness and attachment. The aim of the present review and meta-analysis was to investigate the current evidence linking adult attachment dimensions to trait mindfulness dimensions, and to quantitatively synthesize these findings using meta-analyses. A systematic literature search was conducted using five scientific databases of which, upon review, 33 articles met inclusion criteria. Inclusion criteria were peer-reviewed journals and dissertations published in English that relied on quantitative methods using reliable and validated self-report measures where study participants were aged 16 years and older. Random-effects model meta-analytic procedures were used to investigate the relationship between both constructs. Cross-sectional studies found significant negative correlations between adult attachment insecurity, on either dimension (anxiety or avoidance) and both total mindfulness score and all five sub-dimensions of mindfulness (act with awareness, observe, describe, non-reacting, and non-judging), with the exception of a non-significant positive correlation between attachment anxiety and observe. The effect size of the relationships ranged from small to medium. The overall mean effect sizes were moderate (anxiety, r + = .34; avoidance, r + = −.28), with both attachment dimensions associated with lower levels of total mindfulness. Results are discussed in relation to theory and research. Implications for future research include the need to utilize longitudinal design to address causality and mechanisms of the relationship between these constructs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12671-017-0733-y

Cites

87 of 87 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 90 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Ciano, C. R. (2013). Relationships between acceptance and attachment in adults. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Database. (Accession No. 1368074246).
  2. Kubota, E. (2014). Mindfulness and its relation to HIV-risk behaviors in college students: psychological distress and attachment as moderating factors. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Database (Accession No. 1562992379).
  3. Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Applied social research methods series; Vol. 49. Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  4. Ormiston, A. E. (2011). The role of attachment security and mindfulness in relationship satisfaction and responses to relationship conflict. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Database (Accession No. 875560394).
  5. Tomac, M. M. (2011). The influence of mindfulness on resilience in context of attachment style, affect regulation, and self-esteem (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest database (Accession no. 885414329).
  6. Wang, D. (2011). Attachment security as the social foundation of mindfulness: an exploration into the potential mediating role of dialectical thinking (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Database (Accession No. 926577792).
  7. Wilson, V. R. (2012). Attachment, experiential avoidance, and mindfulness in the narrative disclosure task (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Database (Accession No. 927936278).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stevenson, J. C., Emerson, L.-M., & Millings, A.
Affiliations
University of Sheffield (GB)
Corresponding author
Stevenson, Jodie C.
Venue
Mindfulness
Published
2017-05-24
Volume
8
Issue
6
Pages
1438-1455
ISSN
  • 1868-8527 (ISSN-L)
  • 1868-8535
OpenAlex
W2617982552
Cited by
89
References
90
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6
FWCI
0.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Mindfulness (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lincoln Repository (University of Lincoln) (acceptedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
University of Sheffield
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Keywords
adult attachment, attachment orientation, trait mindfulness, attachment anxiety, attachment avoidance, non-judgment, cross-sectional association

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review