Cited by 102Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsAttachment and Relationship DynamicsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Individual Differences in Attachment and Dispositional Mindfulness: The Mediating Role of Emotion Regulation

Pepping, Christopher A., Davis, Penelope J., O’Donovan, Analise·2013·Personality and Individual Differences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.paid.2012.10.006

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pepping, C. A., Davis, P. J., & O’Donovan, A.
Affiliations
Griffith University (AU)
Corresponding author
Pepping, Christopher A.
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-02
Volume
54
Issue
3
Pages
453-456
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2034056632
Cited by
102
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
FWCI
4.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2015-02-01)
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
attachment, trait mindfulness, emotion regulation, attachment anxiety, attachment avoidance, mediation, individual differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review