Cited by 191Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionMind wandering and attention

Predicting Individual Differences in Mindfulness: The Role of Trait Anxiety, Attachment Anxiety and Attentional Control

Walsh, James J., Balint, Marc G., Smolira SJ, David R., Fredericksen, Line Kamstrup, Madsen, Stine·2009·Personality and Individual Differences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.paid.2008.09.008

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Walsh, J. J., Balint, M. G., Smolira SJ, D. R., Fredericksen, L. K., & Madsen, S.
Affiliations
University of East London (GB)
Corresponding author
Walsh, James J.
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-01
Volume
46
Issue
2
Pages
94-99
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1964358945
Cited by
191
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 12
FWCI
5.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Mind wandering and attention
Keywords
mindfulness, trait anxiety, attachment anxiety, attachment avoidance, attentional control, individual differences, mediation, rumination, hypersensitivity, openness to experience, parental nurturance, attentional bias, interpretation bias

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review