Cited by 437Impact of Technology on AdolescentsMedia and Digital CommunicationPersonality Traits and Psychology

How do people compare themselves with others on social network sites?: The case of Facebook

Lee, Sang Yup·2014·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2013.12.009

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, S. Y.
Affiliations
Michigan State University (US)
Corresponding author
Lee, Sang Yup
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-03
Volume
32
Pages
253-260
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2015697870
Cited by
437
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 6
FWCI
87.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
social comparison, social network sites, Facebook, social comparison orientation, self-esteem, self-uncertainty, self-consciousness, Facebook use intensity, university students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review