Cited by 244Pediatric Pain Management TechniquesHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

The economic impact of chronic pain in adolescence: Methodological considerations and a preliminary costs-of-illness study

Sleed, Michelle, Eccleston, Christopher, Beecham, Jennifer, Knapp, Martin, Jordan, Abbie·2005·Pain

Abstract

Chronic pain in adulthood is one of the most costly conditions in modern western society. However, very little is known about the costs of chronic pain in adolescence. This preliminary study explored methods for collecting economic-related data for this population and estimated the cost-of-illness of adolescent chronic pain in the United Kingdom. The client service receipt inventory was specifically adapted for use with parents of adolescent chronic pain patients to collect economic-related data (CSRI-Pain). This method was compared and discussed in relation to other widely used methods. The CSRI-Pain was sent to 52 families of adolescents with chronic pain to complete as a self-report retrospective questionnaire. These data were linked with unit costs to estimate the total care cost package for each family. The economic impact of adolescent chronic pain was found to be high. The mean cost per adolescent experiencing chronic pain was approximately 8,000 pounds per year, including direct and indirect costs. The adolescents attending a specialised pain management unit, who had predominantly non-inflammatory pain, accrued significantly higher costs, than those attending rheumatology outpatient clinics, who had mostly inflammatory diagnoses. Extrapolating the mean total cost to estimated UK prevalence data of adolescent chronic pain demonstrates a cost-of-illness to UK society of approximately 3,840 million pounds in one year. The implications of the study are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pain.2005.09.028

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 27 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sleed, M., Eccleston, C., Beecham, J., Knapp, M., & Jordan, A.
Affiliations
Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases (GB)
Venue
Pain
Published
2005-12
Volume
119
Issue
1-3
Pages
183-190
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2049533678
Cited by
244
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 13
FWCI
9.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Space (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
adolescent chronic pain, economic burden, economic burden of pain, care costs, direct and indirect costs, non-inflammatory pain, inflammatory pain, rheumatology outpatient care, United Kingdom
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Chronic Disease, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Pain, Pain Measurement, Pilot Projects, Surveys and Questionnaires, Adolescent Health Services, Health Care Costs, Cost of Illness, Pain Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review