Cited by 123Gambling Behavior and TreatmentsDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Behavioral assessment of impulsivity in pathological gamblers with and without substance use disorder histories versus healthy controls

Open access
Ledgerwood, David M., Alessi, Sheila M., Phoenix, Natalie, Petry, Nancy M.·2009·Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Abstract

Pathological gamblers (PGs) may have high levels of impulsivity, and a correlation between substance use disorders (SUDs) and impulsivity is well established. However, only a handful of studies have attempted to assess impulsivity and other impulse-spectrum traits (e.g., sensation seeking) using a variety of behavioral and self-report measures in PGs and few examined the independent impact of SUDs. We compared 30 PGs without SUD histories, 31 PGs with SUD histories and 40 control participants on self-reported impulsivity, delayed discounting, attention/memory, response inhibition, risk taking, sensation seeking and distress tolerance measures. PGs, regardless of SUD history, discounted delayed rewards at greater rates than controls. PGs also reported acting on the spur of the moment, experienced trouble planning and thinking carefully, and noted greater attention difficulties than controls. PGs with SUD took greater risks on a risk-taking task than did PGs without SUD histories, but the two groups did not differ on any other measures of impulsivity. We conclude that PGs are more impulsive than non-problem gamblers in fairly specific ways, but PGs with and without SUD histories differ on few measures. More research should focus on specific ways in which PGs exhibit impulsivity to better address impulsive behaviors in treatment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.06.011

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pathological gamblers are generally more impulsive than non-pathological gamblers.

    “Further, studies reveal that PGs are generally more impulsive than non-PGs (Ledgerwood, Alessi, Phoenix, & Petry, 2009; Petry, 2001; Steel & Blaszczynski, 1998; Vitaro, Arseneault, & Tremblay, 1999).”

    From Subtyping Pathological Gamblers Based on Impulsivity, Depression, and Anxiety (2010) · cites this paper as Ledgerwood, Alessi, Phoenix, & Petry, 2009

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Zachary RA Crumpton E Spiegel DE Estimating WAIS-R IQ from the Shipley Institute of Living Scale J Clin Psychol 1985 41 532 540 4078008
  2. Zuckerman M Behavioral expressions and biosocial bases of personality 1994 New York Cambridge University Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ledgerwood, D. M., Alessi, S. M., Phoenix, N., & Petry, N. M.
Affiliations
UConn Health (US)
Corresponding author
Ledgerwood, David M.
Venue
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-11
Volume
105
Issue
1-2
Pages
89-96
ISSN
0376-8716 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2039731862
Cited by
123
References
56
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 7
FWCI
7.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH060417)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
gambling addiction, impulsivity, delay discounting, sensation seeking, risk-taking, response inhibition, attention and memory, distress tolerance
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Education, Employment, Ethnicity, Female, Gambling, Humans, Impulsive Behavior, Income, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Reward, Risk-Taking, Socioeconomic Factors, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review