Cited by 64Regulation of Appetite and ObesityNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorAnimal Nutrition and Physiology

Strategies of protein selection by weanling and adult rats

Leathwood, Peter D., Ashley, David V.M.·1983·Appetite

Abstract

Weanling and adult male rats were offered pairs of diets containing either 0 and 20%, 0 and 40%, 0 and 60%, or 10 and 40% casein. Initially they preferred the lower protein diets, and then after one to ten days abruptly switched to adequate levels of protein choice. After 14 days, the diets were changed so that the first group received 10 and 40%, the second 20 and 60%, the third 10 and 40%, and the fourth 0 and 60% casein. Following the change, all weanling rats showed significant and systematic shifts in percentage of total energy chosen as protein (%P-E); most adults did not. Within each group, the variability in %P-E selected between different rats was higher than the day-to-day variability of individuals. In the adults no significant correlations were observed between protein selection and brain serotonin metabolism. We conclude that protein intake in rats is regulated in the sense that all animals learnt to eat sufficient protein to maintain growth, and most animals ate a constant amount of protein each day. On the other hand, the range of protein intake between individuals, and the shifts in selection among the weanlings when diet choices were changed seem to preclude the existence of a mechanism which precisely regulates protein intake.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0195-6663(83)80006-3

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When given a choice, a wide range of species will self-select between diets that are high and low in protein in order to maintain protein intake.

    “When given a choice, a wide range of species will self-select between diets that are high and low in protein in order to maintain protein intake”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leathwood, P. D., & Ashley, D. V. M.
Affiliations
Nestlé (Switzerland) (CH)
Corresponding author
Leathwood, Peter D.
Venue
Appetite
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1983-06
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
97-112
ISSN
0195-6663 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2086855877
Cited by
64
References
20
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Appetite (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
Keywords
casein, weanling rats, adult rats, food choice, serotonin metabolism, energy allocation
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain Chemistry, Caseins, Dietary Proteins, Food Preferences, Hydroxyindoleacetic Acid, Male, Nutritional Requirements, Rats, Inbred Strains, Serotonin, Time Factors, Tryptophan, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review