The DOI matches its Crossref record; 138 of the 138 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Concepts of quantum non-Markovianity: A hierarchy
Open accessAbstract
Markovian approximation is a widely-employed idea in descriptions of the dynamics of open quantum systems (OQSs). Although it is usually claimed to be a concept inspired by classical Markovianity, the term quantum Markovianity is used inconsistently and often unrigorously in the literature. In this report we compare the descriptions of classical stochastic processes and quantum stochastic processes (as arising in OQSs), and show that there are inherent differences that lead to the non-trivial problem of characterizing quantum non-Markovianity. Rather than proposing a single definition of quantum Markovianity, we study a host of Markov-related concepts in the quantum regime. Some of these concepts have long been used in quantum theory, such as quantum white noise, factorization approximation, divisibility, Lindblad master equation, etc.. Others are first proposed in this report, including those we call past-future independence, no (quantum) information backflow, and composability. All of these concepts are defined under a unified framework, which allows us to rigorously build hierarchy relations among them. With various examples, we argue that the current most often used definitions of quantum Markovianity in the literature do not fully capture the memoryless property of OQSs. In fact, quantum non-Markovianity is highly context-dependent. The results in this report, summarized as a hierarchy figure, bring clarity to the nature of quantum non-Markovianity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?
Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., & Rosen, N. (1935) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.47.777 · Cited by 16,654
Einstein, A. (1905) · Annalen der Physik · doi:10.1002/andp.19053220806 · Cited by 8,265
On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups
Lindblad, G. (1976) · Communications in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf01608499 · Cited by 7,548 · cited 3×
“[116] for sufficient conditions; a simple example where these conditions fail is given in Section 4.”
BackgroundReciprocal Relations in Irreversible Processes. I.
Onsager, L. (1931) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.37.405 · Cited by 6,660
Metropolis, N., & Ulam, S. (1949) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1949.10483310 · Cited by 6,474 · cited 1×
“Any sample-based numerical simulation method, in this regard, is usually referred to as a Monte Carlo simulation method [168].”
MethodReciprocal Relations in Irreversible Processes. II.
Onsager, L. (1931) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.38.2265 · Cited by 5,367
Hahn, E. L. (1950) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.80.580 · Cited by 5,085
Completely positive dynamical semigroups of N -level systems
Gorini, V., Kossakowski, A., & Sudarshan, E. C. G. (1976) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.522979 · Cited by 3,998 · cited 6×
“[113] in referring to a one parameter semigroup as a dynamical semigroup, but generalize such semigroups to include discrete times, as follows:”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialQuantum detection and estimation theory
Helstrom, C. W. (1969) · Journal of Statistical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf01007479 · Cited by 3,776
Weedbrook, C., Pirandola, S., García-Patrón, R., Cerf, N. J., Ralph, T. C., Shapiro, J. H., & Lloyd, S. (2012) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.84.621 · Cited by 3,664
Discussion of Probability Relations between Separated Systems
Schrödinger, E. (1935) · Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · doi:10.1017/s0305004100013554 · Cited by 3,124
Completely positive linear maps on complex matrices
Choi, M.-D. (1975) · Linear Algebra and its Applications · doi:10.1016/0024-3795(75)90075-0 · Cited by 2,659 · cited 1×
“Further, any map N that preserves Hermiticity can be written as the difference of two completely positive maps N = N 1−N 2 [82].”
BackgroundBrownian Motion of a Quantum Oscillator
Schwinger, J. (1961) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1703727 · Cited by 2,568
Quantum-state engineering with Josephson-junction devices
Makhlin, Y., Schön, G., & Shnirman, A. (2001) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.73.357 · Cited by 2,508
Ensemble Method in the Theory of Irreversibility
Zwanzig, R. (1960) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1731409 · Cited by 2,382
Quantum Monte Carlo simulations of solids
Foulkes, W. M. C., Mitas, L., Needs, R. J., & Rajagopal, G. (2001) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.73.33 · Cited by 2,336
Aharonov, Y., Albert, D. Z., & Vaidman, L. (1988) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.60.1351 · Cited by 2,297
Wave-function approach to dissipative processes in quantum optics
Dalibard, J., Castin, Y., & Mølmer, K. (1992) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.68.580 · Cited by 1,976
Gardiner, C. W., & Collett, M. J. (1985) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.31.3761 · Cited by 1,955
Power Spectrum of Light Scattered by Two-Level Systems
Mollow, B. R. (1969) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.188.1969 · Cited by 1,936
Decoherence-Free Subspaces for Quantum Computation
Lidar, D. A., Chuang, I. L., & Whaley, K. B. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.81.2594 · Cited by 1,858
Dynamical Decoupling of Open Quantum Systems
Viola, L., Knill, E., & Lloyd, S. (1999) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.82.2417 · Cited by 1,808
Fluctuations and Irreversible Processes
Onsager, L., & Machlup, S. (1953) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.91.1505 · Cited by 1,766
Dynamical suppression of decoherence in two-state quantum systems
Viola, L., & Lloyd, S. (1998) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.58.2733 · Cited by 1,575
The quantum-jump approach to dissipative dynamics in quantum optics
Plenio, M. B., & Knight, P. L. (1998) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.70.101 · Cited by 1,515
The Theory of Relaxation Processes
REDFIELD, A. G. (1965) · Advances in Magnetic and Optical Resonance · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4832-3114-3.50007-6 · Cited by 1,511
Measure for the Degree of Non-Markovian Behavior of Quantum Processes in Open Systems
Breuer, H.-P., Laine, E.-M., & Piilo, J. (2009) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.103.210401 · Cited by 1,480
On Quantum Theory of Transport Phenomena: Steady Diffusion
Nakajima, S. (1958) · Progress of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1143/ptp.20.948 · Cited by 1,464
Colloquium: Non-Markovian dynamics in open quantum systems
Breuer, H.-P., Laine, E.-M., Piilo, J., & Vacchini, B. (2016) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.88.021002 · Cited by 1,401
Monte Carlo wave-function method in quantum optics
Mølmer, K., Castin, Y., & Dalibard, J. (1993) · Journal of the Optical Society of America B · doi:10.1364/josab.10.000524 · Cited by 1,233
Quantum Ito's formula and stochastic evolutions
Hudson, R. L., & Parthasarathy, K. R. (1984) · Communications in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf01258530 · Cited by 1,183
Entanglement and Non-Markovianity of Quantum Evolutions
Rivas, Á., Huelga, S. F., & Plenio, M. B. (2010) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.105.050403 · Cited by 1,037
Quantum non-Markovianity: characterization, quantification and detection
Rivas, Á., Huelga, S. F., & Plenio, M. B. (2014) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/77/9/094001 · Cited by 1,035
Quantenmechanik der Sto�vorg�nge
Born, M. (1926) · Zeitschrift f�r Physik · doi:10.1007/bf01397184 · Cited by 956 · cited 1×
“the text book [5]), a term which has its origins in scattering theory [38].”
BackgroundLambert, N., Chen, Y.-N., Cheng, Y.-C., Li, C.-M., Chen, G.-Y., & Nori, F. (2013) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys2474 · Cited by 948
Theory of Quantum Error Correction for General Noise
Knill, E., Laflamme, R., & Viola, L. (2000) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.84.2525 · Cited by 866
Noise spectroscopy through dynamical decoupling with a superconducting flux qubit
Bylander, J., Gustavsson, S., Yan, F., Yoshihara, F., Harrabi, K., Fitch, G., Cory, D. G., Nakamura, Y., Tsai, J.-S., & Oliver, W. D. (2011) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys1994 · Cited by 864
The Dynamical Theory of Nuclear Induction
Wangsness, R. K., & Bloch, F. (1953) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.89.728 · Cited by 828
Reference frames, superselection rules, and quantum information
Bartlett, S. D., Rudolph, T., & Spekkens, R. W. (2007) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.79.555 · Cited by 827
Universal Dynamical Decoupling of a Single Solid-State Spin from a Spin Bath
de Lange, G., Wang, Z. H., Ristè, D., Dobrovitski, V. V., & Hanson, R. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1192739 · Cited by 802
On the identity of three generalized master equations
Zwanzig, R. (1964) · Physica · doi:10.1016/0031-8914(64)90102-8 · Cited by 711
Quantum trajectory theory for cascaded open systems
Carmichael, H. J. (1993) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.70.2273 · Cited by 701
Decoherence of quantum superpositions through coupling to engineered reservoirs
Myatt, C. J., King, B. E., Turchette, Q. A., Sackett, C. A., Kielpinski, D., Itano, W. M., Monroe, C., & Wineland, D. J. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35002001 · Cited by 694
Stochastic processes: Time evolution, symmetries and linear response
Hänggi, P., & Thomas, H. (1982) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/0370-1573(82)90045-x · Cited by 659
LXXV. A dynamical theory of diffusion for non-electrolytes and the molecular mass of albumin
Sutherland, W. (1905) · The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science · doi:10.1080/14786440509463331 · Cited by 658
Optimized dynamical decoupling in a model quantum memory
Biercuk, M. J., Uys, H., VanDevender, A. P., Shiga, N., Itano, W. M., & Bollinger, J. J. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07951 · Cited by 654
Monte Carlo simulation of the atomic master equation for spontaneous emission
Dum, R., Zoller, P., & Ritsch, H. (1992) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.45.4879 · Cited by 652
Real-time quantum feedback prepares and stabilizes photon number states
Sayrin, C., Dotsenko, I., Zhou, X., Peaudecerf, B., Rybarczyk, T., Gleyzes, S., Rouchon, P., Mirrahimi, M., Amini, H., Brune, M., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10376 · Cited by 610
Entanglement Breaking Channels
Horodecki, M., Shor, P. W., & Ruskai, M. B. (2003) · Reviews in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1142/s0129055x03001709 · Cited by 604
Wiener, N. (1923) · Journal of Mathematics and Physics · doi:10.1002/sapm192321131 · Cited by 587
Fault-Tolerant Quantum Dynamical Decoupling
Khodjasteh, K., & Lidar, D. A. (2005) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.95.180501 · Cited by 576
Liu, B.-H., Li, L., Huang, Y.-F., Li, C.-F., Guo, G.-C., Laine, E.-M., Breuer, H.-P., & Piilo, J. (2011) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys2085 · Cited by 574
Self-citationQuantum Fisher information flow and non-Markovian processes of open systems
Lu, X.-M., Wang, X., & Sun, C. P. (2010) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.82.042103 · Cited by 540
On quantum statistical mechanics of non-Hamiltonian systems
Kossakowski, A. (1972) · Reports on Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1016/0034-4877(72)90010-9 · Cited by 526
Stabilizing Rabi oscillations in a superconducting qubit using quantum feedback
Vijay, R., Macklin, C., Slichter, D. H., Weber, S. J., Murch, K. W., Naik, R., Korotkov, A. N., & Siddiqi, I. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11505 · Cited by 490
Fluctuations and Irreversible Process. II. Systems with Kinetic Energy
Machlup, S., & Onsager, L. (1953) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.91.1512 · Cited by 473
A generalized stochastic liouville equation. Non-Markovian versus memoryless master equations
Shibata, F., Takahashi, Y., & Hashitsume, N. (1977) · Journal of Statistical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf01040100 · Cited by 466
Non-Markovian quantum state diffusion
Diósi, L., Gisin, N., & Strunz, W. T. (1998) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.58.1699 · Cited by 464
Quantum Noise. IV. Quantum Theory of Noise Sources
Lax, M. (1966) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.145.110 · Cited by 452
The Series Product and Its Application to Quantum Feedforward and Feedback Networks
Gough, J., & James, M. R. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2009.2031205 · Cited by 449
Wave-function quantum stochastic differential equations and quantum-jump simulation methods
Gardiner, C. W., Parkins, A. S., & Zoller, P. (1992) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.46.4363 · Cited by 443
Coherent and collective quantum optical effects in mesoscopic systems
Brandes, T. (2005) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2004.12.002 · Cited by 434
Structure of States Which Satisfy Strong Subadditivity of Quantum Entropy with Equality
Hayden, P., Jozsa, R., Petz, D., & Winter, A. (2004) · Communications in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/s00220-004-1049-z · Cited by 429
Open Quantum Systems. An Introduction
Rivas, Á., & Huelga, S. F. (2011) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1104.5242 · Cited by 424
Canonical form of master equations and characterization of non-Markovianity
Hall, M. J. W., Cresser, J. D., Li, L., & Andersson, E. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.89.042120 · Cited by 382
Self-citationQuantifying non-Markovianity via correlations
Luo, S., Fu, S., & Song, H. (2012) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.86.044101 · Cited by 353
Interpretation of quantum jump and diffusion processes illustrated on the Bloch sphere
Wiseman, H. M., & Milburn, G. J. (1993) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.47.1652 · Cited by 348
Self-citationFormal Theory of Quantum Fluctuations from a Driven State
Lax, M. (1963) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.129.2342 · Cited by 346
Theory of Spin Resonance and Relaxation
Argyres, P. N., & Kelley, P. L. (1964) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.134.a98 · Cited by 338
Non-Markovian quantum processes: Complete framework and efficient characterization
Pollock, F. A., Rodríguez-Rosario, C., Frauenheim, T., Paternostro, M., & Modi, K. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.97.012127 · Cited by 334
Piilo, J., Maniscalco, S., Härkönen, K., & Suominen, K.-A. (2008) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.100.180402 · Cited by 316
Thermalizing Quantum Machines: Dissipation and Entanglement
Scarani, V., Ziman, M., Štelmachovič, P., Gisin, N., & Bužek, V. (2002) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.88.097905 · Cited by 313
The Physics of Quantum Information: Quantum Cryptography, Quantum Teleportation, Quantum Computation
Bouwmeester, D., EKERT, A. K., & Zeilinger, A. (2010) · Cited by 306
Chaturvedi, S., & Shibata, F. (1979) · Zeitschrift f�r Physik B Condensed Matter and Quanta · doi:10.1007/bf01319852 · Cited by 305
Fundamentals of quantum information theory
Keyl, M. (2002) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/s0370-1573(02)00266-1 · Cited by 303
Quantum Computers, Factoring, and Decoherence
Chuang, I. L., Laflamme, R., Shor, P. W., & Zurek, W. H. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.270.5242.1633 · Cited by 289
Wolf, M. M., & Cirac, J. I. (2008) · Communications in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/s00220-008-0411-y · Cited by 288
Measures of non-Markovianity: Divisibility versus backflow of information
Chruściński, D., Kossakowski, A., & Rivas, Á. (2011) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.83.052128 · Cited by 270
Accardi, L., Frigerio, A., & Lewis, J. T. (1982) · Publications of the Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences · doi:10.2977/prims/1195184017 · Cited by 263
Non-Markovian Quantum Dynamics: Local versus Nonlocal
Chruściński, D., & Kossakowski, A. (2010) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.104.070406 · Cited by 261
Operational Markov Condition for Quantum Processes
Pollock, F. A., Rodríguez-Rosario, C., Frauenheim, T., Paternostro, M., & Modi, K. (2018) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.120.040405 · Cited by 261
Costa, F., & Shrapnel, S. (2016) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/18/6/063032 · Cited by 259
Quantum trajectories and quantum measurement theory
Wiseman, H. M. (1996) · Quantum and Semiclassical Optics: Journal of the European Optical Society Part B · doi:10.1088/1355-5111/8/1/015 · Cited by 247
Self-citationDavies, E. B. (1969) · Communications in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf01645529 · Cited by 237
Non-Markovian quantum-state diffusion: Perturbation approach
Yu, T., Diósi, L., Gisin, N., & Strunz, W. T. (1999) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.60.91 · Cited by 228
Hierarchy of Stochastic Pure States for Open Quantum System Dynamics
Suess, D., Eisfeld, A., & Strunz, W. T. (2014) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.150403 · Cited by 221
Quantum-Enhanced Optical-Phase Tracking
Yonezawa, H., Nakane, D., Wheatley, T. A., Iwasawa, K., Takeda, S., Arao, H., Ohki, K., Tsumura, K., Berry, D. W., Ralph, T. C., et al. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1225258 · Cited by 219
Self-citationStochastic wave-function approach to non-Markovian systems
Imamog¯lu, A. (1994) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.50.3650 · Cited by 215
Photoelectron waiting times and atomic state reduction in resonance fluorescence
Carmichael, H. J., Singh, S., Vyas, R., & Rice, P. R. (1989) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.39.1200 · Cited by 213
Markovianity and non-Markovianity in quantum and classical systems
Vacchini, B., Smirne, A., Laine, E.-M., Piilo, J., & Breuer, H.-P. (2011) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/13/9/093004 · Cited by 198
Non-Markovianity through Accessible Information
Fanchini, F. F., Karpat, G., Çakmak, B., Castelano, L. K., Aguilar, G. H., Farías, O. J., Walborn, S. P., Ribeiro, P. H. S., & de Oliveira, M. C. (2014) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.112.210402 · Cited by 181
Decoherence, Pointer Engineering, and Quantum State Protection
Carvalho, A. R. R., Milman, P., de Matos Filho, R. L., & Davidovich, L. (2001) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.86.4988 · Cited by 181
Collision-model-based approach to non-Markovian quantum dynamics
Ciccarello, F., Palma, G. M., & Giovannetti, V. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.87.040103 · Cited by 174
Diluting quantum information: An analysis of information transfer in system-reservoir interactions
Ziman, M., Štelmachovič, P., Bužek, V., Hillery, M., Scarani, V., & Gisin, N. (2002) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.65.042105 · Cited by 173
The life and work of A.A. Markov
Basharin, G. P., Langville, A. N., & Naumov, V. A. (2004) · Linear Algebra and its Applications · doi:10.1016/j.laa.2003.12.041 · Cited by 165
Genuine quantum trajectories for non-Markovian processes
Breuer, H.-P. (2004) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.70.012106 · Cited by 163
Relaxation Phenomena in Spin and Harmonic Oscillator Systems
Rau, J. (1963) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.129.1880 · Cited by 156
Finding the Kraus decomposition from a master equation and vice versa
Andersson, E., Cresser, J. D., & Hall, M. J. W. (2007) · Journal of Modern Optics · doi:10.1080/09500340701352581 · Cited by 155
Self-citationA quantum advantage for inferring causal structure
Ried, K., Agnew, M., Vermeyden, L., Janzing, D., Spekkens, R. W., & Resch, K. J. (2015) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys3266 · Cited by 136
The failure of the quantum regression hypothesis
Peter Talkner, A. (1986) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/0003-4916(86)90207-1 · Cited by 135
Measuring non-Markovianity of processes with controllable system-environment interaction
Tang, J.-S., Li, C.-F., Li, Y.-L., Zou, X.-B., Guo, G.-C., Breuer, H.-P., Laine, E.-M., & Piilo, J. (2012) · EPL (Europhysics Letters) · doi:10.1209/0295-5075/97/10002 · Cited by 127
Non-Markovian quantum stochastic processes and their entropy
Lindblad, G. (1979) · Communications in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf01197883 · Cited by 124
Monte Carlo wavefunctions in quantum optics
Mølmer, K., & Castin, Y. (1996) · Quantum and Semiclassical Optics Journal of the European Optical Society Part B · doi:10.1088/1355-5111/8/1/007 · Cited by 120
Nondemolition observation of a free quantum particle
Belavkin, V. P., & Staszewski, P. (1992) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.45.1347 · Cited by 118
All (qubit) decoherences: Complete characterization and physical implementation
Ziman, M., & Bužek, V. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.72.022110 · Cited by 111
Quantum regression theorem and non-Markovianity of quantum dynamics
Guarnieri, G., Smirne, A., & Vacchini, B. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.90.022110 · Cited by 107
There is No Quantum Regression Theorem
Ford, G. W., & O’Connell, R. F. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.798 · Cited by 103
Non-Markovianity through flow of information between a system and an environment
Haseli, S., Karpat, G., Salimi, S., Khorashad, A. S., Fanchini, F. F., Çakmak, B., Aguilar, G. H., Walborn, S. P., & Ribeiro, P. H. S. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.90.052118 · Cited by 100
Monte Carlo Wave-Function Analysis of 3D Optical Molasses
Castin, Y., & Mølmer, K. (1995) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.74.3772 · Cited by 99
Constructive Method for Detecting the Information Backflow of Non-Markovian Dynamics
Bylicka, B., Johansson, M., & Acín, A. (2017) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.118.120501 · Cited by 99
Simulation of indivisible qubit channels in collision models
Rybár, T., Filippov, S. N., Ziman, M., & Bužek, V. (2012) · Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics · doi:10.1088/0953-4075/45/15/154006 · Cited by 98
Master Equations in Phase-Space Formulation of Quantum Optics
Agarwal, G. S. (1969) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.178.2025 · Cited by 93
Buscemi, F., & Datta, N. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.93.012101 · Cited by 87
Pure-State Quantum Trajectories for General Non-Markovian Systems Do Not Exist
Wiseman, H. M., & Gambetta, J. (2008) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.101.140401 · Cited by 84
Self-citationNote on time evolution of non-Markov processes
Peter Hänggi, A., Thomas, H., Grabert, H., & Peter Talkner, A. (1978) · Journal of Statistical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf01014306 · Cited by 83
Marte, P., Dum, R., Taïeb, R., Lett, P. D., & Zoller, P. (1993) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.71.1335 · Cited by 72
Non-Markovian Continuous Quantum Measurement of Retarded Observables
Diósi, L. (2008) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.100.080401 · Cited by 67
Dynamical decoupling efficiency versus quantum non-Markovianity
Addis, C., Ciccarello, F., Cascio, M., Palma, G. M., & Maniscalco, S. (2015) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/17/12/123004 · Cited by 64
Interpretation of non-Markovian stochastic Schrödinger equations as a hidden-variable theory
Gambetta, J., & Wiseman, H. M. (2003) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.68.062104 · Cited by 64
Self-citationNonrelativistic quantum mechanics as a noncommutative Markof process
Accardi, L. (1976) · Advances in Mathematics · doi:10.1016/0001-8708(76)90201-2 · Cited by 61
Nonequilibrium Statistical Mechanics of Open Systems
Emch, G. G., & Sewell, G. L. (1968) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1664664 · Cited by 60
Markovianity criteria for quantum evolution
Chruściński, D., & Kossakowski, A. (2012) · Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics · doi:10.1088/0953-4075/45/15/154002 · Cited by 54
Non-Markovian Processes with the Semigroup Property
Feller, W. (1959) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177706110 · Cited by 53
Distinguishing decoherence from alternative quantum theories by dynamical decoupling
Arenz, C., Hillier, R., Fraas, M., & Burgarth, D. K. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.92.022102 · Cited by 49
Non-Markovianity measure using two-time correlation functions
Ali, M. M., Lo, P., Tu, M. W.-Y., & Zhang, W.-M. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.92.062306 · Cited by 48
Ai, Q., Fan, Y.-J., Jin, B., & Cheng, Y. (2014) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/16/5/053033 · Cited by 46
Stochastic differential equations anda posteriori states in quantum mechanics
Barchielli, A. (1993) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf00672994 · Cited by 46
Goan, H., Chen, P., & Jian, C.-C. (2011) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.3570581 · Cited by 42
Operational Characterization of Divisibility of Dynamical Maps
Bae, J., & Chruściński, D. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.050403 · Cited by 39
Breuer, H., Kappler, B., & Petruccione, F. (1997) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.56.2334 · Cited by 34
Complete positivity for time-dependent qubit master equations
Hall, M. J. W. (2008) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/41/20/205302 · Cited by 33
Self-citationPerturbative approach to non-Markovian stochastic Schrödinger equations
Gambetta, J., & Wiseman, H. M. (2002) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.66.052105 · Cited by 32
Self-citationQuantum-state diffusion with a moving basis: Computing quantum-optical spectra
Schack, R., Brun, T. A., & Percival, I. C. (1996) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.53.2694 · Cited by 29
The Lax–Onsager regression `theorem' revisited
Lax, M. (2000) · Optics Communications · doi:10.1016/s0030-4018(00)00622-2 · Cited by 28
Dynamical decoupling of unbounded Hamiltonians
Arenz, C., Burgarth, D. K., Facchi, P., & Hillier, R. (2018) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.5016495 · Cited by 28
Jumplike unravelings for non-Markovian open quantum systems
Gambetta, J., Askerud, T., & Wiseman, H. M. (2004) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.69.052104 · Cited by 21
Self-citationComplete parametrizations of diffusive quantum monitorings
Chia, A., & Wiseman, H. M. (2011) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.84.012119 · Cited by 18
Self-citationCan quantum Markov evolutions ever be dynamically decoupled?
Gough, J. E., & Nurdin, H. I. (2017) · Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Decision & Control, including the Symposium on Adaptive Processes · doi:10.1109/cdc.2017.8264587 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, L., Hall, M. J. W., & Wiseman, H. M.
- Venue
- Physics Reports
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-10
- Volume
- 759
- Pages
- 1-51
- ISSN
- 0370-1573 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2781250181
- Cited by
- 353
- References
- 138
- FWCI
- 16.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.