CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 23Motor Control and AdaptationNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesAction Observation and Synchronization

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 611 of the 613 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cortico-spinal modularity in the parieto-frontal system: A new perspective on action control

Open access
Bufacchi, R.J., Battaglia-Mayer, A., Iannetti, G.D., Caminiti, R.·2023·Progress in Neurobiology
DOI 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2023.102537
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Classical neurophysiology suggests that the motor cortex (MI) has a unique role in action control. In contrast, this review presents evidence for multiple parieto-frontal spinal command modules that can bypass MI. Five observations support this modular perspective: (i) the statistics of cortical connectivity demonstrate functionally-related clusters of cortical areas, defining functional modules in the premotor, cingulate, and parietal cortices; (ii) different corticospinal pathways originate from the above areas, each with a distinct range of conduction velocities; (iii) the activation time of each module varies depending on task, and different modules can be activated simultaneously; (iv) a modular architecture with direct motor output is faster and less metabolically expensive than an architecture that relies on MI, given the slow connections between MI and other cortical areas; (v) lesions of the areas composing parieto-frontal modules have different effects from lesions of MI. Here we provide examples of six cortico-spinal modules and functions they subserve: module 1) arm reaching, tool use and object construction; module 2) spatial navigation and locomotion; module 3) grasping and observation of hand and mouth actions; module 4) action initiation, motor sequences, time encoding; module 5) conditional motor association and learning, action plan switching and action inhibition; module 6) planning defensive actions. These modules can serve as a library of tools to be recombined when faced with novel tasks, and MI might serve as a recombinatory hub. In conclusion, the availability of locally-stored information and multiple outflow paths supports the physiological plausibility of the proposed modular perspective.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2023.102537

Cites

611 of 613 references verified0 citation errors · 2 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Items 401–600 of 613

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Bernstein N.A. The coordination and regulation of movements. Pergamon Press e, Oxford, New York, 1967.
  2. Guterstam, 2019, Direct Electrophysiol. Correl. Body Ownersh. Hum. Cereb. Cortex, 1328
  3. Lhermitte, 1981, Le “comportement d’utilisation” et ses relations avec les lésions del lobes frontaux, Rev. Neurol., 137, 846
  4. Mayer Gross, 1935, Some observation on apraxia, Proc. R. Soc. Med, 28, 1203
  5. Passingham, 2010, Medial frontal cortex: from self-generated action to reflection on one's own performance, Trends Cogn. Sci., 14, 16, 10.1016/j.tics.2009.11.001 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Strauss, 1929, Das Zusammenschrecken, J. Psychol. U. Neurol., 39, 111

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 23

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Bufacchi, R. J., Battaglia-Mayer, A., Iannetti, G. D., & Caminiti, R.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Italian Institute of Technology (IT)
Corresponding author
Caminiti, R.
ORCID
Venue
Progress in Neurobiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-12
Volume
231
Pages
102537
ISSN
0301-0082 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.pneurobio.2023.102537
OpenAlex
W4387542305
Cited by
22
References
606
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5
FWCI
0.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Progress in Neurobiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Greater South Information System
Funders
  • Sapienza Università di Roma
  • Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia
  • Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca (201794KEER_002)
  • MIUR
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
Keywords
motor cortex, action control, premotor cortex, cingulate cortex, parietal cortex, cortical connectivity, conduction velocity, response inhibition, tool use, spatial navigation, grasping, motor learning, lesion effects
MeSH terms
Cognition, Hand, Humans, Parietal Lobe

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review