The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
FDM process parameters influence over the mechanical properties of polymer specimens: A review
Abstract
Abstract Designing and manufacturing functional parts for fields such as engineering and medicine is a major goal of Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM). These activities should be supported by knowledge on how different settings of process parameters impact the mechanical behavior of the products. However, obtaining this information is a quite complex task given the large variety of possible combinations of materials-3D printers-slicing software-process parameters. Thus, the importance of reviewing the current research on this topic for identifying practical and useful aspects, key process parameters and limitations, but also for understanding to what extent the results of these researches are relevant and can be applied in further studies and real applications. A systematic literature search was performed based on classification according to the type of 3D printing polymer. The most significant process parameters considered as influencing FDM specimens' tensile, compression, flexural or impact strengths are discussed considering the results presented in the literature. A necessary distinction between the mechanical properties of material and testing specimens (as given by producers and by experiments) and the mechanical behavior of a FDM end-part is also made.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Anisotropic material properties of fused deposition modeling ABS
Ahn, S., Montero, M., Odell, D., Roundy, S., & Wright, P. K. (2002) · Rapid Prototyping Journal · doi:10.1108/13552540210441166 · Cited by 2,382
Design for Additive Manufacturing: Trends, opportunities, considerations, and constraints
Thompson, M. K., Moroni, G., Vaneker, T., Fadel, G., Campbell, R. I., Gibson, I., Bernard, A., Schulz, J., Graf, P., Ahuja, B., et al. (2016) · CIRP Annals · doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2016.05.004 · Cited by 2,017
Chacón, J. M., Caminero, M. A., García-Plaza, E., & Núñez, P. J. (2017) · Materials & Design · doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2017.03.065 · Cited by 1,603
Parametric appraisal of mechanical property of fused deposition modelling processed parts
Sood, A. K., Ohdar, R. K., & Mahapatra, S. S. (2010) · Materials & Design · doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2009.06.016 · Cited by 1,318
Effect of processing conditions on the bonding quality of FDM polymer filaments
Sun, Q., Rizvi, G. M., Bellehumeur, C. T., & Gu, P. (2008) · Rapid Prototyping Journal · doi:10.1108/13552540810862028 · Cited by 1,277
Tymrak, B. M., Kreiger, M., & Pearce, J. M. (2014) · Materials & Design · doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2014.02.038 · Cited by 1,244
Wu, W., Geng, P., Li, G., Zhao, D., Zhang, H., & Zhao, J. (2015) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma8095271 · Cited by 881
Lanzotti, A., Grasso, M., Staiano, G., & Martorelli, M. (2015) · Rapid Prototyping Journal · doi:10.1108/rpj-09-2014-0135 · Cited by 684
Mechanical characterization of parts fabricated using fused deposition modeling
Bellini, A., & Güçeri, S. (2003) · Rapid Prototyping Journal · doi:10.1108/13552540310489631 · Cited by 628
Optimization of rapid prototyping parameters for production of flexible ABS object
Lee, B. H., Abdullah, J. M., & Khan, Z. A. (2005) · Journal of Materials Processing Technology · doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.02.259 · Cited by 578
Effect of Layer Orientation on Mechanical Properties of Rapid Prototyped Samples
Es-Said, O. S., Foyos, J., Noorani, R., Mendelson, M., Marloth, R., & Pregger, B. A. (2000) · Materials and Manufacturing Processes · doi:10.1080/10426910008912976 · Cited by 577
Sood, A. K., Ohdar, R. K., & Mahapatra, S. S. (2012) · Journal of Advanced Research · doi:10.1016/j.jare.2011.05.001 · Cited by 576
Mechanical property characterization and simulation of fused deposition modeling Polycarbonate parts
Domingo-Espin, M., Puigoriol-Forcada, J. M., Garcia-Granada, A.-A., Llumà, J., Borros, S., & Reyes, G. (2015) · Materials & Design · doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2015.06.074 · Cited by 535
Effect of Infill Parameters on Tensile Mechanical Behavior in Desktop 3D Printing
Fernandez-Vicente, M., Calle, W., Ferrandiz, S., & Conejero, A. (2016) · 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing · doi:10.1089/3dp.2015.0036 · Cited by 535
Durgun, I., & Ertan, R. (2014) · Rapid Prototyping Journal · doi:10.1108/rpj-10-2012-0091 · Cited by 530
Casavola, C., Cazzato, A., Moramarco, V., & Pappalettere, C. (2015) · Materials & Design · doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2015.11.009 · Cited by 493
The effects of PLA color on material properties of 3-D printed components
Wittbrodt, B., & Pearce, J. M. (2015) · Additive manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.addma.2015.09.006 · Cited by 473
Rankouhi, B., Javadpour, S., Delfanian, F., & Letcher, T. (2016) · Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention · doi:10.1007/s11668-016-0113-2 · Cited by 457
Anisotropic Mechanical Properties of ABS Parts Fabricated by Fused Deposition Modelling
Ziemian, C., Sharma, M., & Ziemi, S. (2012) · Mechanical Engineering · doi:10.5772/34233 · Cited by 387
Mechanical Property Optimization of FDM PLA in Shear with Multiple Objectives
Torres, J., Cotelo, J., Karl, J., & Gordon, A. P. (2015) · JOM · doi:10.1007/s11837-015-1367-y · Cited by 374
Croccolo, D., De Agostinis, M., & Olmi, G. (2013) · Computational Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.06.041 · Cited by 369
Rodríguez, J. F., Thomas, J. P., & Renaud, J. E. (2001) · Rapid Prototyping Journal · doi:10.1108/13552540110395547 · Cited by 362
Hoang, D., Perrault, D., Stevanovic, M., & Ghiassi, A. (2016) · Annals of Translational Medicine · doi:10.21037/atm.2016.12.18 · Cited by 317
Torres, J., Cole, M., Owji, A., DeMastry, Z., & Gordon, A. P. (2016) · Rapid Prototyping Journal · doi:10.1108/rpj-07-2014-0083 · Cited by 295
Torrado, A. R., & Roberson, D. A. (2016) · Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention · doi:10.1007/s11668-016-0067-4 · Cited by 291
Zaldivar, R. J., Witkin, D. B., McLouth, T., Patel, D. N., Schmitt, K., & Nokes, J. P. (2017) · Additive Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.addma.2016.11.007 · Cited by 277
Three-dimensional printing surgical instruments: are we there yet?
Rankin, T. M., Giovinco, N. A., Cucher, D. J., Watts, G., Hurwitz, B., & Armstrong, D. G. (2014) · Journal of Surgical Research · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2014.02.020 · Cited by 275
Mechanical Properties Optimization of Poly-Ether-Ether-Ketone via Fused Deposition Modeling
Deng, X., Zeng, Z., Peng, B., Yan, S., & Ke, W. (2018) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma11020216 · Cited by 265
Onwubolu, G. C., & Rayegani, F. (2014) · International Journal of Manufacturing Engineering · doi:10.1155/2014/598531 · Cited by 252
Fracture resistance measurement of fused deposition modeling 3D printed polymers
Aliheidari, N., Tripuraneni, R., Ameli, A., & Nadimpalli, S. (2017) · Polymer Testing · doi:10.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.03.016 · Cited by 244
Peng, A., Xiao, X., & Yue, R. (2014) · The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology · doi:10.1007/s00170-014-5796-5 · Cited by 228
Liu, X., Zhang, M., Li, S., Si, L., Peng, J., & Yuan, H. (2016) · The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology · doi:10.1007/s00170-016-9263-3 · Cited by 176
Solid Freeform Fabrication Proceedings -1999
Bourell, D. L., Beaman, J. J., Jr., C., Richard H., M., Harris L., B., & Joel, W. (1999) · doi:10.21236/ada377264 · Cited by 173
3D Printing of Surgical Instruments for Long-Duration Space Missions
Wong, J. Y., & Pfahnl, A. C. (2014) · Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine · doi:10.3357/asem.3898.2014 · Cited by 155
Tensile Properties of Processed FDM Polycarbonate Material
Masood, S. H., Mau, K., & Song, W. (2010) · Materials science forum · doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.654-656.2556 · Cited by 153
Uddin, M., Sidek, M. F. R., Faizal, M. A., Ghomashchi, R., & Pramanik, A. (2017) · Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering · doi:10.1115/1.4036713 · Cited by 145
Forster, A. M. (2015) · doi:10.6028/nist.ir.8059 · Cited by 143
Experimental Characterization of the Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed ABS and Polycarbonate Parts
Cantrell, J. T., Rohde, S., Damiani, D., et al. (2016) · Conference proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-41600-7_11 · Cited by 120
Comparison of Ultem 9085 Used in Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) with Polytherimide Blends
Cicala, G., Ognibene, G., Portuesi, S., Blanco, I., Rapisarda, M., Pergolizzi, E., & Recca, G. (2018) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma11020285 · Cited by 98
Experimental Analysis of High Temperature PEEK Materials on 3D Printing Test
Sun, X., Liangcheng, C., Ma, H., Peng, G., Bai, Z., & Li, C. (2017) · International Conference on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation (ICMTMA) · doi:10.1109/icmtma.2017.0012 · Cited by 92
Cited by
Kabir, S. M. F., Mathur, K., & Seyam, A.-F. M. (2020) · Composite Structures · doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111476 · Cited by 678
Kafle, A., Luis, E., Silwal, R., Pan, H. M., Shrestha, P. L., & Bastola, A. K. (2021) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym13183101 · Cited by 587
Shanmugam, V., Das, O., Babu, K., Marimuthu, U., Veerasimman, A., Johnson, D. J., Neisiany, R. E., Hedenqvist, M. S., Ramakrishna, S., & Berto, F. (2021) · International Journal of Fatigue · doi:10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.106007 · Cited by 538
Recent Developments in Fused Deposition Modeling-Based 3D Printing of Polymers and Their Composites
Rahim, T. N. A. T., Abdullah, A. M., & Md Akil, H. (2019) · Polymer Reviews · doi:10.1080/15583724.2019.1597883 · Cited by 452
Fused deposition modeling: process, materials, parameters, properties, and applications
Rajan, K., Samykano, M., Kadirgama, K., Harun, W. S. W., & Rahman, M. M. (2022) · The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology · doi:10.1007/s00170-022-08860-7 · Cited by 426
Metadata
- Authors
- Popescu, D., Zapciu, A., Amza, C., Baciu, F., & Marinescu, R.
- Venue
- Polymer Testing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-08
- Volume
- 69
- Pages
- 157-166
- ISSN
- 0142-9418 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2803400344
- Cited by
- 1,015
- References
- 40
- FWCI
- 42.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
