Cited by 756Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 76 of the 76 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 22 of the 79 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Mindfulness-Based Interventions for Anxiety and Depression

Open access
Hofmann, Stefan G., Gómez, Angelina F.·2017·Psychiatric Clinics of North America

Abstract

This article reviews the ways in which mindfulness practices have contributed to cognitive and behavioral treatments for depression and anxiety. Research on mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) has increased rapidly in the past decade. The most common include mindfulness-based stress reduction and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy. MBIs are effective in reducing anxiety and depression symptom severity in a range of individuals. MBIs consistently outperform non–evidence-based treatments and active control conditions, such as health education, relaxation training, and supportive psychotherapy. MBIs also perform comparably with cognitive behavior therapy (CBT). The treatment principles of MBIs for anxiety and depression are compatible with standard CBT. © 2017 Elsevier Inc.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psc.2017.08.008

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

22 of 79 cited sources checked · 10 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 24
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 9
31 of 31

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 75 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Hayes SC, Hofmann SG. The third wave of CBT and the rise of process-based care. World Psychiatry, in press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 756

Metadata

Authors
Hofmann, S. G., & Gómez, A. F.
Affiliations
Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
Hofmann, Stefan G.
Venue
Psychiatric Clinics of North America
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-12
Volume
40
Issue
4
Pages
739-749
ISSN
0193-953X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2754358908
Cited by
756
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 101 · 2025: 139 · 2024: 138 · 2023: 136 · 2022: 96 · 2021: 75 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 10
FWCI
2.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychiatric Clinics of North America (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • OpenBU (Boston University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (R01AT007257)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
mindfulness-based interventions, mindfulness-based stress reduction, mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, anxiety, depression, cognitive behavioral therapy, treatment efficacy, symptom severity, relaxation training, supportive therapy
MeSH terms
Anxiety Disorders, Depressive Disorder, Humans, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-09-28, under version 3 of the claim definition (prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-09-28 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review