Cited by 94Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchChild Abuse and TraumaPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Neural responses during emotional processing before and after cognitive trauma therapy for battered women.

Aupperle, Robin L., Allard, Carolyn B., Simmons, Alan N., Flagan, Taru, Thorp, Steven R., Norman, Sonya B., Paulus, Martin P., Stein, Murray B.·2013·Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging

Abstract

Therapy for combat and accident-related posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) has been reported to influence amygdala and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) response during emotional processing. It is not yet understood how therapy influences different phases of emotional processing, and whether previous findings generalize to other PTSD populations. We hypothesized that cognitive trauma therapy for battered women (CTT-BW) would alter insula, amygdala, and cingulate responses during anticipation and presentation of emotional images. Fourteen female patients with PTSD related to domestic violence completed the Clinician Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) before and after CTT-BW. The fMRI task involved cued anticipation followed by presentation of positive versus negative affective images. CTT-BW was associated with decreases in CAPS score, enhanced ACC and decreased anterior insula activation during anticipation, and decreased dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and amygdala response during image presentation (negative-positive). Pre-treatment ACC activation during anticipation and image presentation exhibited positive and negative relationships to treatment response, respectively. Results suggest that CTT-BW enhanced efficiency of neural responses during preparation for upcoming emotional events in a way that reduced the need to recruit prefrontal-amygdala responses during the occurrence of the event. Results also suggest that enhancing ACC function during anticipation may be beneficial for PTSD treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2013.05.001

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aupperle, R. L., Allard, C. B., Simmons, A. N., Flagan, T., Thorp, S. R., Norman, S. B., Paulus, M. P., & Stein, M. B.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Aupperle, Robin L.
Venue
Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-10
Volume
214
Issue
1
Pages
48-55
ISSN
0925-4927 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2080641591
Cited by
93
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1
FWCI
8.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
battered women, domestic violence, post-traumatic stress disorder, emotional processing, anterior cingulate cortex, anterior insula, amygdala, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, emotional anticipation, treatment response
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention, Brain, Emotions, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Domestic Violence, Battered Women

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review