Cited by 40Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchChild Abuse and TraumaPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

CHILDHOOD MALTREATMENT PREDICTS REDUCED INHIBITION-RELATED ACTIVITY IN THE ROSTRAL ANTERIOR CINGULATE IN PTSD, BUT NOT TRAUMA-EXPOSED CONTROLS: Research Article: Childhood Maltreatment, Inhibition, and PTSD

Open access
Stevens, Jennifer S., Ely, Timothy D., Sawamura, Takehito, Guzman, Dora, Bradley, Bekh, Ressler, Kerry J., Jovanovic, Tanja·2016·Depression and Anxiety

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A deficit in the ability to inhibit fear has been proposed as a biomarker of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Previous research indicates that individuals with PTSD show reduced inhibition-related activation in rostral anterior cingulate cortex (rACC). The goal of the current study was to investigate differential influences of an early environmental risk factor for PTSD-childhood maltreatment-on inhibition-related brain function in individuals with PTSD versus trauma-exposed controls. METHODS: Individuals with PTSD (n = 37) and trauma-exposed controls (n = 53) were recruited from the primary care waiting rooms of an urban public hospital in Atlanta, GA. Participants completed an inhibition task during fMRI, and reported childhood and adult traumatic experiences. The groups were matched for adult and child trauma load. RESULTS: We observed an interaction between childhood maltreatment severity and PTSD status in the rACC (P < .05, corrected), such that maltreatment was negatively associated with inhibition-related rACC activation in the PTSD group, but did not influence rACC activation in the TC group. Rostral ACC activation was associated with inhibition-related task performance in the TC group but not the PTSD group, suggesting a possible contribution to stress resilience. CONCLUSIONS: Findings highlight individual differences in neural function following childhood trauma, and point to inhibition-related activation in rostral ACC as a risk factor for PTSD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/da.22506

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A follow-up study with a larger sample size suggested that the effects of vmPFC/rACC on behavioral inhibition are moderated by childhood maltreatment effects in participants with PTSD.

    “A follow-up study with a larger sample size suggested that the effects of vmPFC/rACC on behavioral inhibition are moderated by childhood maltreatment effects in participants with PTSD [175].”

    From Prefrontal cortex, amygdala, and threat processing: implications for PTSD (2022) · cites this paper as [175]

    The Abstract Results report that childhood maltreatment was associated with reduced inhibition-related rACC activation in participants with PTSD, but not in trauma-exposed controls. They do not establish that maltreatment moderated an effect of vmPFC/rACC activity on behavioral inhibition: rACC activation was associated with task performance in controls, not in the PTSD group. The paper describes this as following earlier work, but the supplied passages do not establish the relative sample size. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [17]Binder EB Bradley RG Liu W Association of FKBP5 polymorphisms and childhood abuse with risk of posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms in adults JAMA 2008 299 11 1291 305 18349090 PMC2441757

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stevens, J. S., Ely, T. D., Sawamura, T., Guzman, D., Bradley, B., Ressler, K. J., & Jovanovic, T.
Affiliations
  • Emory University (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences; Emory University School of Medicine; Atlanta Georgia
Corresponding author
Stevens, Jennifer S.
Venue
Depression and Anxiety
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-04-08
Volume
33
Issue
7
Pages
614-622
ISSN
1091-4269 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2340972133
Cited by
40
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2
FWCI
7.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Depression and Anxiety (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Mental Health (MH098212, F32MH101976, and MH071537;)
  • NIH National Centers for Research Resources (M01RR00039)
  • NIH (UL1TR000454)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
child abuse, post-traumatic stress disorder, rostral anterior cingulate cortex, inhibition, fear inhibition, stress resilience, neural markers, inhibitory control
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Black or African American, Child, Child Abuse, Female, Georgia, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Middle Aged, Severity of Illness Index, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Stress, Psychological, Urban Population, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review