Cited by 369Impact of Technology on AdolescentsSexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyGambling Behavior and Treatments

The risk factors of Internet addiction—A survey of university freshmen

Tsai, Hsing Fang, Cheng, Shu Hui, Yeh, Tzung Lieh, Shih, Chi-Chen, Chen, Kao Ching, Yang, Yi Ching, Yang, Yen Kuang·2009·Psychiatry Research

Abstract

This study was designed to explore the risk factors of Internet addiction in 1360 freshmen of the National Cheng Kung University in Taiwan in 2003. The test battery included a self-administrated structured questionnaire, the Chinese Internet Addiction Scale-Revision (CIAS-R), the 12-item Chinese Health Questionnaire (CHQ-12), the Measurement of Support Functions (MSF), and the neuroticism subscale of the Maudsley Personality Inventory (MPI). Of the total study population, there were 680 college freshmen (17.9%) in the Internet addiction group, as defined by high CIAS-R scores. Using logistic regression analyses, we found positive relationships between Internet addiction and male gender, neuroticism scores and the CHQ score. In addition, the freshmen who skipped breakfast and those who had poorer social support also had a higher probability of Internet addiction. Internet addiction is prevalent among university freshmen in Taiwan. Risk factors included male gender, habit of skipping breakfast, mental health morbidity, deficient social support; and neurotic personality characteristics.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psychres.2008.01.015

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 40 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tsai, H. F., Cheng, S. H., Yeh, T. L., Shih, C.-C., Chen, K. C., Yang, Y. C., & Yang, Y. K.
Affiliations
  • National Cheng Kung University Hospital (TW)
  • National Cheng Kung University (TW)
Corresponding author
Yang, Yi Ching
Venue
Psychiatry Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-05
Volume
167
Issue
3
Pages
294-299
ISSN
0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2134599820
Cited by
368
References
40
Citations by year
2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 17
FWCI
30.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Cheng Kung University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
Keywords
internet addiction, risk factors, first-year students, neuroticism, social support, breakfast skipping, mental health, gender differences
MeSH terms
Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Life Style, Male, Neurotic Disorders, Personality Inventory, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Social Support, Students, Taiwan, Universities, Prevalence, Behavior, Addictive, Video Games, Internet, Asian People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review