Cited by 13Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesTreatment of Major Depression

Affective information processing in pregnancy and postpartum with and without major depression

Open access
Gollan, Jackie K., Hoxha, Denada, Getch, Sarah, Sankin, Lindsey, Michon, Ruth·2013·Psychiatry Research

Abstract

Adults with clinical depression exhibit systematic errors in their recognition and interpretation of affective stimuli. This study investigated the extent to which depression and phases of pregnancy and postpartum influence affective processing of positive and negative information, and the extent to which affective information processing in pregnancy predicts depressive symptoms in postpartum. Data were collected from 80 unmedicated women, diagnosed with major depressive disorder (MDD) or with no psychiatric disorder and between ages 18 and 44 years, during 32-36 weeks of pregnancy and during 6-8 weeks postpartum. All completed a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV (DSM-IV) Axis I review, symptom reports, and a computer task measuring affective information processing. Significant group differences were found in which postpartum women with major depression were less responsive to negative stimuli, with lower ratings of intensity and reactions to negative pictorial stimuli, compared with postpartum healthy women. Also, lower ratings of the intensity and reactions to negative stimuli during pregnancy among depressed women predicted postpartum depression severity, even after controlling for depressive severity and affect ratings in pregnancy. Blunted affective reactivity to negative stimuli is a characteristic of depression that was observed among depressed women during pregnancy and postpartum in our study.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psychres.2012.11.030

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mothers with PPD were generally less responsive to negative stimuli, with lower ratings for intensity and reactions to negative pictorial stimuli, than mothers without PPD.

    “Finally, mothers with PPD were generally less responsive to negative stimuli, with lower ratings for intensity and reactions to negative pictorial stimuli, than mothers without PPD.42”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Csukly G Czobor P Szily E Takacs B Simon L 2009 Facial expression recognition in depressed subjects the impact of intensity level and arousal dimension Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 197 98 103 19214044
  2. Harris ND Deary I Harris MB Lees MM Wilson JA 1996 Peripartal cognitive impairment: secondary to depression? British Journal of Health Psychology 1 127 136
  3. Larsen JT Norris CJ McGraw AP Hawkley LC Cacioppo JT 2009 The evaluative space grid: a single-item measure of positivity and negativity Cognition and Emotion 23 453 480
  4. Tronick E Beeghly M 2011 Meaning making and infant mental health American Psychologist 66 2 107 119 21142336 PMC3135310
  5. van Beek Y Dubas J 2008 Decoding basic and non-basic facial expressions and depressive symptoms in late childhood and adolescence Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 32 53 64
  6. Yik MS Russell JA Feldman Barrett L 1999 Structure of self-reported current affect: integration and beyond Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77 600 619

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gollan, J. K., Hoxha, D., Getch, S., Sankin, L., & Michon, R.
Affiliations
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • Northwestern Memorial Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Gollan, Jackie K.
Venue
Psychiatry Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-04
Volume
206
Issue
2-3
Pages
206-212
ISSN
0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2095236819
Cited by
13
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Feinberg School of Medicine
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R21MH082133)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
emotional processing, major depressive disorder, pregnancy, postpartum depression, negative stimuli, positive stimuli
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Affect, Cognition, Major Depressive Disorder, Emotions, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Case-Control Studies, Depression, Postpartum, Recognition, Psychology, Postpartum Period, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review