Cited by 125Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthDeath, Funerary Practices, and MourningPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

Prolonged grief and depression after unnatural loss: latent class analyses and cognitive correlates

Open access
Boelen, Paul A., Reijntjes, Albert, J. Djelantik, A.A.A. Manik, Smid, Geert E.·2016·Psychiatry Research

Abstract

This study sought to identify (a) subgroups among people confronted with unnatural/violent loss characterized by different symptoms profiles of prolonged grief disorder (PGD) and depression, and (b) socio-demographic, loss-related, and cognitive variables associated with subgroup membership. We used data from 245 individuals confronted with the death of a loved one due to an accident (47.3%), suicide (49%) or homicide (3.7%). Latent class analysis revealed three classes of participants: a resilient-class (25.3%), a predominantly PGD-class (39.2%), and a combined PGD/Depression-class (35.5%). Membership in the resilient-class was predicted by longer time since loss and lower age; membership in the combined class was predicted by lower education. Endorsement of negative cognitions about the self, life, the future, and one's own grief-reactions was lowest in the Resilient-class, intermediate in the PGD-class, and highest in the combined PGD/Depression-class. When all socio-demographic, loss-related, and cognitive variables were included in multinomial regression analyses predicting class-membership, it was found that negative cognitions about one's grief was the only variable predicting membership of the PGD-class. Negative cognitions about the self, life, and grief predicted membership of the combined PGD/Depression-class. These findings provide valuable information for the development of interventions for different subgroups of bereaved individuals confronted with unnatural/violent loss.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.04.012

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Unnatural losses may cause more mental health difficulties because of the disruption of positive and self-evident assumptions about the world and due to more intrusive and negative memories.

    “Theoretically, unnatural losses may cause more mental health difficulties because of the disruption of positive and self-evident assumptions about the world (i.e., 'the world is a safe place') and due to more intrusive and negative memories.”

    From The prevalence of prolonged grief disorder in bereaved individuals following unnatural losses: Systematic review and meta regression analysis (2020) · cites this paper as Boelen et al., 2016

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says unnatural or violent losses carry elevated risks of disturbed grief, PTSD, and depression, and discusses maladaptive cognitions and negative beliefs about the world and safety as possible contributors. It does not say that more intrusive and negative memories explain the greater difficulties; the paper’s reported findings concern negative cognitions, not memories. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Muthén, L.K., Muthén, B.O., 2011. Mplus User's Guide. Muthén & Muthén, Los An- geles, CA (Sixth edition).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boelen, P. A., Reijntjes, A., J. Djelantik, A. A. A. M., & Smid, G. E.
Affiliations
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • Arq Psychotrauma Expert Group (NL)
Corresponding author
Boelen, Paul A.
Venue
Psychiatry Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-06
Volume
240
Pages
358-363
ISSN
0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2321264351
Cited by
125
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2
FWCI
15.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Keywords
prolonged grief disorder, depression, bereavement, suicide bereavement, homicide, accident deaths, negative thinking, grief, resilience, symptom subtypes, bereavement interventions
MeSH terms
Adult, Bereavement, Death, Depression, Female, Grief, Homicide, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Suicide, Resilience, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review