Cited by 139Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthDigital Mental Health InterventionsPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

A randomized controlled trial of an internet-based therapist-assisted indicated preventive intervention for prolonged grief disorder

Open access
Litz, Brett T., Schorr, Yonit, Delaney, Eileen, Au, Teresa, Papa, Anthony, Fox, Annie B., Morris, Sue, Nickerson, Angela +2 more·2014·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

This trial assessed the feasibility, acceptability, tolerability, and efficacy of an Internet-based therapist-assisted cognitive-behavioral indicated prevention intervention for prolonged grief disorder (PGD) called Healthy Experiences After Loss (HEAL). Eighty-four bereaved individuals at risk for PGD were randomized to either an immediate treatment group (n = 41) or a waitlist control group (n = 43). Assessments were conducted at four time-points: prior to the wait-interval (for the waitlist group), pre-intervention, post-intervention, 6 weeks later, and 3 months later (for the immediate group only). Intent-to-treat analyses indicated that HEAL was associated with large reductions in prolonged grief (d = 1.10), depression (d = .71), anxiety (d = .51), and posttraumatic stress (d = .91). Also, significantly fewer participants in the immediate group met PGD criteria post-intervention than in the waitlist group. Pooled data from both groups also yielded significant reductions and large effect sizes in PGD symptom severity at each follow-up assessment. The intervention required minimal professional oversight and ratings of satisfaction with treatment and usability of the Internet interface were high. HEAL has the potential to be an effective, well-tolerated tool to reduce the burden of significant pre-clinical PGD. Further research is needed to refine HEAL and to assess its efficacy and mechanisms of action in a large-scale trial.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brat.2014.07.005

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 77 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Litz BT Neria Y Gross R Marshall R Treatment and dissemination of treatment programs: Summary and discussion 9 11 Treatment, research, and public mental health in the wake of a terrorist attack 2001 446 456 Cambridge Cambridge University Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Litz, B. T., Schorr, Y., Delaney, E., Au, T., Papa, A., Fox, A. B., Morris, S., Nickerson, A., Block, S., & Prigerson, H. G.
Affiliations
  • Boston University (US)
  • VA Boston Healthcare System (US)
  • Bureau of Medicine and Surgery (US)
  • University of Nevada, Reno (US)
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Litz, Brett T.
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-10
Volume
61
Pages
23-34
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2093168957
Cited by
139
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 10
FWCI
10.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R34MH079884, MH079884)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Keywords
prolonged grief disorder, online intervention, bereavement, depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress, treatment feasibility and acceptability
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Female, Grief, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Remote Consultation, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review