Cited by 29Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentNeuroendocrine regulation and behaviorCrime Patterns and Interventions

Linking testosterone and antisocial behavior in at-risk transitional aged youth: Contextual effects of parentification

Chen, Frances R., Dariotis, Jacinda K., Granger, Douglas A.·2018·Psychoneuroendocrinology

Abstract

Parentification refers to parents bestowing adult-like roles on children within families, and studies have linked parentification to individual differences in risk and resilience. The depth of our understanding of the pathways that translate parentification into risk for negative developmental outcomes remains shallow. This study examined whether parentification has a contextual effect moderating the expression of links between testosterone and antisocial behavior. Eighty-three participants (M age = 21.37 years, SD = 1.87; 48% Black; 60% female) were interviewed initially and one year later. Audio Computer Assisted Self-Interview methods were used to measure parentification and antisocial behavior. Saliva was sampled on multiple occasions and later assayed for testosterone. Results revealed, for both sexes, testosterone was positively associated with antisocial behavior at baseline and at follow-up when participants scored low on perceived benefits of parentification. This relationship became weaker as levels of perceived benefits of parentification increased. At the highest levels of perceived benefits of parentification, testosterone and antisocial behavior were inversely related. The findings suggest a potentially important role for perceptions of parentification as a moderator for the expression of hormone-behavior relationships and are discussed in terms of implications for the biosocial model of the family.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2018.02.023

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 59 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, F. R., Dariotis, J. K., & Granger, D. A.
Affiliations
  • Georgia State University (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
Corresponding author
Chen, Frances R.
Venue
Psychoneuroendocrinology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-05
Volume
91
Pages
1-10
ISSN
0306-4530 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2791920501
Cited by
29
References
59
Citations by year
2023: 24 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3
FWCI
1.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychoneuroendocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes on Drug Abuse (K01DA029571)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
Keywords
parentification, testosterone, antisocial behavior, hormone-behavior relationship, transitional-aged youth, at-risk youth, saliva testosterone
MeSH terms
Adverse Childhood Experiences, Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Antisocial Personality Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Parent-Child Relations, Parents, Saliva, Testosterone, Parenting, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review