The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A benefit–cost analysis on the economic feasibility of construction waste minimisation: The case of Malaysia
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
US Environmental Protection Agency
(1998) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.35-4455 · Cited by 5,897
On-site sorting of construction and demolition waste in Hong Kong
Poon, C. S., Yu, A. T. W., & Ng, L. H. (2001) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/s0921-3449(01)00052-0 · Cited by 431
Implementation of environmental management in the Hong Kong construction industry
Shen, L. Y., & Tam, V. W. Y. (2002) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/s0263-7863(01)00054-0 · Cited by 367
Strategies for successful construction and demolition waste recycling operations
Peng, C.-L., Scorpio, D. E., & Kibert, C. J. (1997) · Construction Management and Economics · doi:10.1080/014461997373105 · Cited by 291
Source Evaluation of Solid Waste in Building Construction
Gavilan, R. M., & Bernold, L. E. (1994) · Journal of Construction Engineering and Management · doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9364(1994)120:3(536 · Cited by 257
Goven, O., & Melville, J. G. (1999) · Cited by 212
Characterization of building-related construction and demolition debris in the United States
Response, E., & Associates, F. (1998) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 202
An application of bar-code system for reducing construction wastes
Chen, Z., Li, H., & Wong, C. T. C. (2002) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/s0926-5805(01)00063-2 · Cited by 186
Lingard, H. C., Graham, P., & Smithers, G. (2000) · Construction Management and Economics · doi:10.1080/01446190050024806 · Cited by 144
A systems analysis tool for construction and demolition wastes management
Wang, J., Touran, A., Christoforou, C., & Fadlalla, H. (2004) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2004.07.010 · Cited by 116
Cited by
Trend of the research on construction and demolition waste management
Yuan, H., & Shen, L. (2011) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2010.10.030 · Cited by 574
Quantifying construction and demolition waste: An analytical review
Wu, Z., Yu, A. T. W., Shen, L., & Liu, G. (2014) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2014.05.010 · Cited by 400
Purchase, C. K., Al Zulayq, D. M., O’Brien, B. T., Kowalewski, M. J., Berenjian, A., Tarighaleslami, A. H., & Seifan, M. (2021) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma15010076 · Cited by 357
A framework for understanding waste management studies in construction
Lu, W., & Yuan, H. (2011) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2011.01.018 · Cited by 353
Ajayi, S. O., Oyedele, L. O., Bilal, M., Akinade, O. O., Alaka, H. A., Owolabi, H. A., & Kadiri, K. O. (2015) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.06.001 · Cited by 282
Metadata
- Authors
- Begum, R. A., Siwar, C., Pereira, J. J., & Jaafar, A. H.
- Venue
- Resources, Conservation and Recycling
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-07
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 86-98
- ISSN
- 0921-3449 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1993239857
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 12.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A benefit–cost analysis on the economic feasibility of construction waste minimisation: The case of Malaysia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.resconrec.2006.01.004
- The paper
- Begum, R. A., Siwar, C., Pereira, J. J., & Jaafar, A. H. (2006). A benefit–cost analysis on the economic feasibility of construction waste minimisation: The case of Malaysia. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2006.01.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
