The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Targets for a circular economy
Open accessAbstract
The transition to a circular economy requires actions and policies. In the praxis of governance, a common way to steer the transition to a different state proceeds through the setting of targets. Thus far, no study has investigated circular economy targets in a systematic way. To bridge this gap, this study examines which targets can facilitate the transition towards a circular economy. The analysis focuses both on existing and new targets; the latter complement existing targets which are limited to a few discrete cases addressing only partially the goal of a more circular economy. A framework based on 10 common circular economy strategies (i.e. recover, recycling, repurpose, remanufacture, refurbish, repair, re-use, reduce, rethink, refuse) is applied to scrutinise the selected targets. The study clarifies that existing targets for recovery and recycling do not necessarily promote a circular economy, though they are the most commonly applied targets so far. Because of lack of efficacy of recovery and recycling, targets should instead favour other more powerful circular economy strategies. In relation to these, the study looks into new and existing targets showing how they can reduce waste, increase efficiency, close production loops, and maximise retention of the economic value of materials and products. In particular, the study proposes an expanded set of brand new targets for the transition to a circular economy together with a fresh view on targets aimed at scholars and decision-makers alike.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions
Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., & Hekkert, M. (2017) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005 · Cited by 8,550
Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C., & Ulgiati, S. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007 · Cited by 6,536
WHAT’S MEASURED IS WHAT MATTERS: TARGETS AND GAMING IN THE ENGLISH PUBLIC HEALTH CARE SYSTEM
BEVAN, G., & HOOD, C. (2006) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2006.00600.x · Cited by 1,580
Measuring circular economy strategies through index methods: A critical analysis
Elia, V., Gnoni, M. G., & Tornese, F. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.196 · Cited by 892
Interrogating the circular economy: The moral economy of resource recovery in the EU
Gregson, N., Crang, M., Fuller, S., & Holmes, H. (2015) · Economy and Society · doi:10.1080/03085147.2015.1013353 · Cited by 743
Circular Economy in the building sector: Three cases and a collaboration tool
Leising, E., Quist, J., & Bocken, N. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.010 · Cited by 527
Do circular economy business models capture intended environmental value propositions?
Manninen, K., Koskela, S., Antikainen, R., Bocken, N., Dahlbo, H., & Aminoff, A. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.003 · Cited by 488
Circular Business Models: Defining a Concept and Framing an Emerging Research Field
Nußholz, J. (2017) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su9101810 · Cited by 415
Life cycle assessment of thermal Waste-to-Energy technologies: Review and recommendations
Astrup, T. F., Tonini, D., Turconi, R., & Boldrin, A. (2015) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2014.06.011 · Cited by 350
The Environmental Impacts of Reuse: A Review
Cooper, D. R., & Gutowski, T. G. (2017) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/jiec.12388 · Cited by 337
Research works printed but not linked: 74
- Akenji, 2016, Ossified materialism: introduction to the special volume on absolute reductions in materials throughput and emissions, J. Clean. Prod., 132, 1, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.071 · DOI
- Allwood, 2011, Material efficiency: a white paper, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 55, 362, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.11.002 · DOI · Paper page
- Andrews, 2015, The circular economy, design thinking and education for sustainability, Local Econ., 30, 305, 10.1177/0269094215578226 · DOI · Paper page
- Bahn-Walkowiak, 2015, Resource targets in Europe and worldwide: an overview, Resources, 4, 597, 10.3390/resources4030597 · DOI
- Bjørn, 2017, Is Earth recognized as a finite system in corporate responsibility reporting?, J. Clean. Prod., 163, 106, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.095 · DOI
- Blichert-Toft, 2017, Geochemical perspectives, Future Glob. Miner. Resour., 6, 1
- Boswell, 2015, The double life of targets in public policy: disciplining and signalling in UK Asylum policy, Publ. Adm., 93, 490, 10.1111/padm.12134 · DOI
- Bressanelli, 2018, Challenges in supply chain redesign for the circular economy: a literature review and a multiple case study, Int. J. Prod. Res., 1
- Clark, 2016, Circular economy design considerations for research and process development in the chemical sciences, Green Chem., 18, 3914, 10.1039/C6GC00501B · DOI · Paper page
- Clift, 2011, Rethinking the economy, Chem. Eng., 837, 30
- Cooper, 2005, Slower consumption reflections on product life spans and the “throwaway society”, J. Ind. Ecol., 9, 51, 10.1162/1088198054084671 · DOI · Paper page
- Cullen, 2017, Circular economy: theoretical benchmark or perpetual motion machine?, J. Ind. Ecol., 21, 483, 10.1111/jiec.12599 · DOI · Paper page
- De Jesus, 2018, Lost in transition? Drivers and barriers in the eco-innovation road to the circular economy, Ecol. Econ., 145, 75, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.08.001 · DOI · Paper page
- De los Rios, 2017, Skills and capabilities for a sustainable and circular economy: the changing role of design, J. Clean. Prod., 160, 109, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.130 · DOI · Paper page
- Demirbas, 2009, Biofuels securing the planet’s future energy needs, Energy Convers. Manage., 50, 2239, 10.1016/j.enconman.2009.05.010 · DOI · Paper page
- den Hollander, 2017, Product design in a circular economy: development of a typology of key concepts and terms, J. Ind. Ecol., 21, 517, 10.1111/jiec.12610 · DOI · Paper page
- Despeisse, 2017, Unlocking value for a circular economy through 3D printing: a research agenda, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 115, 75, 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.09.021 · DOI · Paper page
- Geyer, 2016, Common misconceptions about recycling, J. Ind. Ecol., 20, 1010, 10.1111/jiec.12355 · DOI · Paper page
- Guide, 2000, Production planning and control for remanufacturing: industry practice and research needs, J. Oper. Manag., 18, 467, 10.1016/S0272-6963(00)00034-6 · DOI · Paper page
- Haas, 2015, How circular is the global economy?: An assessment of material flows, waste production, and recycling in the European Union and the world in 2005, J. Ind. Ecol., 19, 765, 10.1111/jiec.12244 · DOI · Paper page
- Haupt, 2017, Influence of input scrap quality on the environmental impact of secondary steel production, J. Ind. Ecol., 21, 391, 10.1111/jiec.12439 · DOI · Paper page
- Haupt, 2017, How can LCA support the circular economy?—63rd discussion forum on life cycle assessment, Zurich, Switzerland, November 30, 2016, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 22, 832, 10.1007/s11367-017-1267-1 · DOI
- Hofmann, 2019, Circular business models: business approach as driver or obstructer of sustainability transitions?, J. Clean. Prod., 224, 361, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.115 · DOI · Paper page
- Homrich, 2018, The circular economy umbrella: trends and gaps on integrating pathways, J. Clean. Prod., 175, 525, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.064 · DOI · Paper page
- Jani, 2014, Waste glass in the production of cement and concrete–a review, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 2, 1767, 10.1016/j.jece.2014.03.016 · doi:10.1016/j.jece.2014.03.016
- Jawahir, 2007, Sustainable manufacturing processes: new challenges for developing predictive models and optimization techniques, Proc. 1st-International Conference on Sustainable Manufacturing, 18–19/10/2007, 1
- Jayaraman, 2006, Production planning for closed-loop supply chains with product recovery and reuse: an analytical approach, Int. J. Prod. Res., 44, 981, 10.1080/00207540500250507 · DOI · Paper page
- Jensen, 2011, Quantifying ‘geographic proximity’: experiences from the United Kingdom’s national industrial symbiosis programme, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 55, 703, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.02.003 · DOI · Paper page
- Kalmykova, 2018, Circular economy – from review of theories and practices to development of implementation tools, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 135, 190, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.10.034 · DOI · Paper page
- Karvonen, 2017, Identifying recommendations to promote remanufacturing in Europe, J. Remanufact., 7, 159, 10.1007/s13243-017-0038-2 · doi:10.1007/s13243-017-0038-2
- King, 2006, Reducing waste: repair, recondition, remanufacture or recycle?, Sustain. Dev., 14, 257, 10.1002/sd.271 · DOI · Paper page
- Kristensen, 2016, Enabling sustainable agro-food futures: exploring fault lines and synergies between the integrated territorial paradigm, rural eco-economy and circular economy, J. Agric. Environ. Ethics, 29, 749, 10.1007/s10806-016-9632-9 · DOI
- Laurenti, 2018, The socio-economic embeddedness of the circular economy: an integrative framework, Sustainability, 10, 2129, 10.3390/su10072129 · DOI
- Lewandowski, 2016, Designing the business models for circular economy–towards the conceptual framework, Sustainability, 8, 43, 10.3390/su8010043 · DOI · Paper page
- Lewis, 2010, Evaluating the sustainability impacts of packaging: the plastic carry bag dilemma, Packag. Technol. Sci., 23, 145, 10.1002/pts.886 · DOI
- Lieder, 2016, Towards circular economy implementation: a comprehensive review in context of manufacturing industry, J. Clean. Prod., 115, 36, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.042 · DOI · Paper page
- Linder, 2017, Ripe for disruption: reimagining the role of green chemistry in a circular economy, Green Chem. Lett. Rev., 10, 428, 10.1080/17518253.2017.1392618 · DOI
- Linder, 2017, A metric for quantifying product‐level circularity, J. Ind. Ecol., 21, 545, 10.1111/jiec.12552 · DOI · Paper page
- Lüdeke-Freund, 2019, A review and typology of circular economy business model patterns, J. Ind. Ecol., 23, 36, 10.1111/jiec.12763 · DOI · Paper page
- Lund, 1998, Remanufacturing: an American resource, Proceedings of the Fifth International Congress Environmentally Conscious Design and Manufacturing
- Masi, 2017, Supply chain configurations in the circular economy: a systematic literature review, Sustainability, 9, 1602, 10.3390/su9091602 · DOI · Paper page
- Mayer, 2019, Measuring progress towards a circular economy: a monitoring framework for economy-wide material loop closing in the EU28, J. Ind. Ecol., 23, 62, 10.1111/jiec.12809 · DOI · Paper page
- McDowall, 2017, Circular economy policies in China and Europe, J. Ind. Ecol., 21, 651, 10.1111/jiec.12597 · DOI · Paper page
- Milios, 2018, Advancing to a Circular Economy: three essential ingredients for a comprehensive policy mix, Sustain. Sci., 13, 861, 10.1007/s11625-017-0502-9 · DOI · Paper page
- Moreau, 2017, Coming full circle: why social and institutional dimensions matter for the circular economy, J. Ind. Ecol., 21, 497, 10.1111/jiec.12598 · DOI · Paper page
- Morseletto, 2017, Governing by targets: reductio ad unum and evolution of the two-degree climate target, Int. Environ. Agreem.: Polit. Law Econ., 17, 655, 10.1007/s10784-016-9336-7 · DOI
- Morseletto, P., 2020. Restorative and regenerative: exploring the concepts in the circular economy. J. Ind. Ecol. forthcoming. · DOI · Paper page
- Murray, 2017, The circular economy: an interdisciplinary exploration of the concept and application in a global context, J. Bus. Ethics, 140, 369, 10.1007/s10551-015-2693-2 · DOI · Paper page
- Nelson, 1991, Why do firms differ, and how does it matter?, Strateg. Manage. J., 12, 61, 10.1002/smj.4250121006 · DOI · Paper page
- Niero, 2016, Circular economy: to be or not to be in a closed product loop? A life cycle assessment of aluminium cans with inclusion of alloying elements, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 114, 18, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.06.023 · DOI · Paper page
- Parida, 2006, Maintenance performance measurement (MPM): issues and challenges, J. Qual. Maint. Eng., 12, 239, 10.1108/13552510610685084 · DOI · Paper page
- Parris, 2003, Characterizing and measuring sustainable development, Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour., 28, 559, 10.1146/annurev.energy.28.050302.105551 · DOI · Paper page
- Prieto-Sandoval, 2018, Towards a consensus on the circular economy, J. Clean. Prod., 179, 605, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.224 · DOI · Paper page
- Ranta, 2018, Exploring institutional drivers and barriers of the circular economy: a cross-regional comparison of China, the US, and Europe, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 135, 70, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.08.017 · DOI · Paper page
- Reike, 2018, The circular economy: new or refurbished as CE 3.0?—exploring controversies in the conceptualization of the circular economy through a focus on history and resource value retention options, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 135, 246, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.08.027 · DOI · Paper page
- Repo, 2018, Lack of congruence between European citizen perspectives and policies on circular economy, Eur. J. Sustain. Dev., 7, 249, 10.14207/ejsd.2018.v7n1p249 · DOI
- Rotmans, 2001, More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy, Foresight, 3, 15, 10.1108/14636680110803003 · DOI · Paper page
- Sakai, 2011, International comparative study of 3R and waste management policy developments, J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag., 13, 86, 10.1007/s10163-011-0009-x · DOI · Paper page
- Santini, 2010, Assessment of Ecodesign potential in reaching new recycling targets, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 54, 1128, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.03.006 · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.03.006
- Sihvonen, 2015, Conceptualizing ReX for aggregating end-of-life strategies in product development, Procedia CIRP, 29, 639, 10.1016/j.procir.2015.01.026 · DOI · Paper page
- Sihvonen, 2017, Eco-design practices with a focus on quantitative environmental targets: an exploratory content analysis within ICT sector, J. Clean. Prod., 143, 769, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.047 · DOI
- Singh, 2016, Resource recovery from post-consumer waste: important lessons for the upcoming circular economy, J. Clean. Prod., 134, 342, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.020 · DOI · Paper page
- Smol, 2015, The possible use of sewage sludge ash (SSA) in the construction industry as a way towards a circular economy, J. Clean. Prod., 95, 45, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.051 · DOI · Paper page
- Sousa-Zomer, 2018, Exploring the challenges for circular business implementation in manufacturing companies: an empirical investigation of a pay-per-use service provider, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 135, 3, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.10.033 · DOI · Paper page
- Su, 2013, A review of the circular economy in China: moving from rhetoric to implementation, J. Clean. Prod., 42, 215, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.020 · DOI · Paper page
- Tukker, 2015, Product services for a resource-efficient and circular economy–a review, J. Clean. Prod., 97, 76, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.049 · DOI · Paper page
- Tuominen, 2007, Assessing the interaction between transport policy targets and policy implementation—a Finnish case study, Transp. Policy, 14, 388, 10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.04.002 · DOI
- Tecchio, 2017, In search of standards to support circularity in product policies: a systematic approach, J. Clean. Prod., 168, 1533, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.198 · DOI
- Wang, 2013, Policies and perspective on end-of-life vehicles in China, J. Clean. Prod., 44, 168, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.036 · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.036
- Willskytt, 2016, Framework for analysing resource-efficient solutions, EcoBalance Conference 2016
- Wieser, 2016, Beyond planned obsolescence: product lifespans and the challenges to a circular economy, GAIA-Ecol. Perspect. Sci. Soc., 25, 156
- Zaman, 2015, A comprehensive review of the development of zero waste management: lessons learned and guidelines, J. Clean. Prod., 91, 12, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.013 · DOI · Paper page
- Zink, 2017, Circular economy rebound, J. Ind. Ecol., 21, 593, 10.1111/jiec.12545 · DOI · Paper page
- Zhu, 2010, Circular economy practices among Chinese manufacturers varying in environmental-oriented supply chain cooperation and the performance implications, J. Environ. Manage., 91, 1324, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.02.013 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Bag, S., Pretorius, J. H. C., Gupta, S., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120420 · Cited by 910
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) as a Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)
Fallah Shayan, N., Mohabbati-Kalejahi, N., Alavi, S., & Zahed, M. A. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14031222 · Cited by 615
Redesigning Supply Chains using Blockchain-Enabled Circular Economy and COVID-19 Experiences
Nandi, S., Sarkis, J., Hervani, A. A., & Helms, M. M. (2021) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2020.10.019 · Cited by 494
Drivers and barriers in the transition from a linear economy to a circular economy
Neves, S. A., & Marques, A. C. (2022) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130865 · Cited by 359
Dey, P. K., Chowdhury, S., Abadie, A., Vann Yaroson, E., & Sarkar, S. (2024) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2023.2179859 · Cited by 330
Metadata
- Authors
- Morseletto, P.
- Venue
- Resources, Conservation and Recycling
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-02
- Volume
- 153
- Pages
- 104553
- ISSN
- 0921-3449 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2988590694
- Cited by
- 1,414
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 166.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
- creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Targets for a circular economy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104553
- The paper
- Morseletto, P. (2020). Targets for a circular economy. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104553
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.