Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,414

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Targets for a circular economy

Open access
Morseletto, Piero·2020·Resources, Conservation and Recycling

Abstract

The transition to a circular economy requires actions and policies. In the praxis of governance, a common way to steer the transition to a different state proceeds through the setting of targets. Thus far, no study has investigated circular economy targets in a systematic way. To bridge this gap, this study examines which targets can facilitate the transition towards a circular economy. The analysis focuses both on existing and new targets; the latter complement existing targets which are limited to a few discrete cases addressing only partially the goal of a more circular economy. A framework based on 10 common circular economy strategies (i.e. recover, recycling, repurpose, remanufacture, refurbish, repair, re-use, reduce, rethink, refuse) is applied to scrutinise the selected targets. The study clarifies that existing targets for recovery and recycling do not necessarily promote a circular economy, though they are the most commonly applied targets so far. Because of lack of efficacy of recovery and recycling, targets should instead favour other more powerful circular economy strategies. In relation to these, the study looks into new and existing targets showing how they can reduce waste, increase efficiency, close production loops, and maximise retention of the economic value of materials and products. In particular, the study proposes an expanded set of brand new targets for the transition to a circular economy together with a fresh view on targets aimed at scholars and decision-makers alike.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104553

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 12 references

Research works printed but not linked: 74

  1. Akenji, 2016, Ossified materialism: introduction to the special volume on absolute reductions in materials throughput and emissions, J. Clean. Prod., 132, 1, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.071 · DOI
  2. Allwood, 2011, Material efficiency: a white paper, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 55, 362, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.11.002 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Andrews, 2015, The circular economy, design thinking and education for sustainability, Local Econ., 30, 305, 10.1177/0269094215578226 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Bahn-Walkowiak, 2015, Resource targets in Europe and worldwide: an overview, Resources, 4, 597, 10.3390/resources4030597 · DOI
  5. Bjørn, 2017, Is Earth recognized as a finite system in corporate responsibility reporting?, J. Clean. Prod., 163, 106, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.095 · DOI
  6. Blichert-Toft, 2017, Geochemical perspectives, Future Glob. Miner. Resour., 6, 1
  7. Boswell, 2015, The double life of targets in public policy: disciplining and signalling in UK Asylum policy, Publ. Adm., 93, 490, 10.1111/padm.12134 · DOI
  8. Bressanelli, 2018, Challenges in supply chain redesign for the circular economy: a literature review and a multiple case study, Int. J. Prod. Res., 1
  9. Clark, 2016, Circular economy design considerations for research and process development in the chemical sciences, Green Chem., 18, 3914, 10.1039/C6GC00501B · DOI · Paper page
  10. Clift, 2011, Rethinking the economy, Chem. Eng., 837, 30
  11. Cooper, 2005, Slower consumption reflections on product life spans and the “throwaway society”, J. Ind. Ecol., 9, 51, 10.1162/1088198054084671 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Cullen, 2017, Circular economy: theoretical benchmark or perpetual motion machine?, J. Ind. Ecol., 21, 483, 10.1111/jiec.12599 · DOI · Paper page
  13. De Jesus, 2018, Lost in transition? Drivers and barriers in the eco-innovation road to the circular economy, Ecol. Econ., 145, 75, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.08.001 · DOI · Paper page
  14. De los Rios, 2017, Skills and capabilities for a sustainable and circular economy: the changing role of design, J. Clean. Prod., 160, 109, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.130 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Demirbas, 2009, Biofuels securing the planet’s future energy needs, Energy Convers. Manage., 50, 2239, 10.1016/j.enconman.2009.05.010 · DOI · Paper page
  16. den Hollander, 2017, Product design in a circular economy: development of a typology of key concepts and terms, J. Ind. Ecol., 21, 517, 10.1111/jiec.12610 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Despeisse, 2017, Unlocking value for a circular economy through 3D printing: a research agenda, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 115, 75, 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.09.021 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Geyer, 2016, Common misconceptions about recycling, J. Ind. Ecol., 20, 1010, 10.1111/jiec.12355 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Guide, 2000, Production planning and control for remanufacturing: industry practice and research needs, J. Oper. Manag., 18, 467, 10.1016/S0272-6963(00)00034-6 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Haas, 2015, How circular is the global economy?: An assessment of material flows, waste production, and recycling in the European Union and the world in 2005, J. Ind. Ecol., 19, 765, 10.1111/jiec.12244 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Haupt, 2017, Influence of input scrap quality on the environmental impact of secondary steel production, J. Ind. Ecol., 21, 391, 10.1111/jiec.12439 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Haupt, 2017, How can LCA support the circular economy?—63rd discussion forum on life cycle assessment, Zurich, Switzerland, November 30, 2016, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 22, 832, 10.1007/s11367-017-1267-1 · DOI
  23. Hofmann, 2019, Circular business models: business approach as driver or obstructer of sustainability transitions?, J. Clean. Prod., 224, 361, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.115 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Homrich, 2018, The circular economy umbrella: trends and gaps on integrating pathways, J. Clean. Prod., 175, 525, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.064 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Jani, 2014, Waste glass in the production of cement and concrete–a review, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 2, 1767, 10.1016/j.jece.2014.03.016 · doi:10.1016/j.jece.2014.03.016
  26. Jawahir, 2007, Sustainable manufacturing processes: new challenges for developing predictive models and optimization techniques, Proc. 1st-International Conference on Sustainable Manufacturing, 18–19/10/2007, 1
  27. Jayaraman, 2006, Production planning for closed-loop supply chains with product recovery and reuse: an analytical approach, Int. J. Prod. Res., 44, 981, 10.1080/00207540500250507 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Jensen, 2011, Quantifying ‘geographic proximity’: experiences from the United Kingdom’s national industrial symbiosis programme, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 55, 703, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.02.003 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Kalmykova, 2018, Circular economy – from review of theories and practices to development of implementation tools, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 135, 190, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.10.034 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Karvonen, 2017, Identifying recommendations to promote remanufacturing in Europe, J. Remanufact., 7, 159, 10.1007/s13243-017-0038-2 · doi:10.1007/s13243-017-0038-2
  31. King, 2006, Reducing waste: repair, recondition, remanufacture or recycle?, Sustain. Dev., 14, 257, 10.1002/sd.271 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Kristensen, 2016, Enabling sustainable agro-food futures: exploring fault lines and synergies between the integrated territorial paradigm, rural eco-economy and circular economy, J. Agric. Environ. Ethics, 29, 749, 10.1007/s10806-016-9632-9 · DOI
  33. Laurenti, 2018, The socio-economic embeddedness of the circular economy: an integrative framework, Sustainability, 10, 2129, 10.3390/su10072129 · DOI
  34. Lewandowski, 2016, Designing the business models for circular economy–towards the conceptual framework, Sustainability, 8, 43, 10.3390/su8010043 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Lewis, 2010, Evaluating the sustainability impacts of packaging: the plastic carry bag dilemma, Packag. Technol. Sci., 23, 145, 10.1002/pts.886 · DOI
  36. Lieder, 2016, Towards circular economy implementation: a comprehensive review in context of manufacturing industry, J. Clean. Prod., 115, 36, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.042 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Linder, 2017, Ripe for disruption: reimagining the role of green chemistry in a circular economy, Green Chem. Lett. Rev., 10, 428, 10.1080/17518253.2017.1392618 · DOI
  38. Linder, 2017, A metric for quantifying product‐level circularity, J. Ind. Ecol., 21, 545, 10.1111/jiec.12552 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Lüdeke-Freund, 2019, A review and typology of circular economy business model patterns, J. Ind. Ecol., 23, 36, 10.1111/jiec.12763 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Lund, 1998, Remanufacturing: an American resource, Proceedings of the Fifth International Congress Environmentally Conscious Design and Manufacturing
  41. Masi, 2017, Supply chain configurations in the circular economy: a systematic literature review, Sustainability, 9, 1602, 10.3390/su9091602 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Mayer, 2019, Measuring progress towards a circular economy: a monitoring framework for economy-wide material loop closing in the EU28, J. Ind. Ecol., 23, 62, 10.1111/jiec.12809 · DOI · Paper page
  43. McDowall, 2017, Circular economy policies in China and Europe, J. Ind. Ecol., 21, 651, 10.1111/jiec.12597 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Milios, 2018, Advancing to a Circular Economy: three essential ingredients for a comprehensive policy mix, Sustain. Sci., 13, 861, 10.1007/s11625-017-0502-9 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Moreau, 2017, Coming full circle: why social and institutional dimensions matter for the circular economy, J. Ind. Ecol., 21, 497, 10.1111/jiec.12598 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Morseletto, 2017, Governing by targets: reductio ad unum and evolution of the two-degree climate target, Int. Environ. Agreem.: Polit. Law Econ., 17, 655, 10.1007/s10784-016-9336-7 · DOI
  47. Morseletto, P., 2020. Restorative and regenerative: exploring the concepts in the circular economy. J. Ind. Ecol. forthcoming. · DOI · Paper page
  48. Murray, 2017, The circular economy: an interdisciplinary exploration of the concept and application in a global context, J. Bus. Ethics, 140, 369, 10.1007/s10551-015-2693-2 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Nelson, 1991, Why do firms differ, and how does it matter?, Strateg. Manage. J., 12, 61, 10.1002/smj.4250121006 · DOI · Paper page
  50. Niero, 2016, Circular economy: to be or not to be in a closed product loop? A life cycle assessment of aluminium cans with inclusion of alloying elements, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 114, 18, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.06.023 · DOI · Paper page
  51. Parida, 2006, Maintenance performance measurement (MPM): issues and challenges, J. Qual. Maint. Eng., 12, 239, 10.1108/13552510610685084 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Parris, 2003, Characterizing and measuring sustainable development, Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour., 28, 559, 10.1146/annurev.energy.28.050302.105551 · DOI · Paper page
  53. Prieto-Sandoval, 2018, Towards a consensus on the circular economy, J. Clean. Prod., 179, 605, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.224 · DOI · Paper page
  54. Ranta, 2018, Exploring institutional drivers and barriers of the circular economy: a cross-regional comparison of China, the US, and Europe, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 135, 70, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.08.017 · DOI · Paper page
  55. Reike, 2018, The circular economy: new or refurbished as CE 3.0?—exploring controversies in the conceptualization of the circular economy through a focus on history and resource value retention options, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 135, 246, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.08.027 · DOI · Paper page
  56. Repo, 2018, Lack of congruence between European citizen perspectives and policies on circular economy, Eur. J. Sustain. Dev., 7, 249, 10.14207/ejsd.2018.v7n1p249 · DOI
  57. Rotmans, 2001, More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy, Foresight, 3, 15, 10.1108/14636680110803003 · DOI · Paper page
  58. Sakai, 2011, International comparative study of 3R and waste management policy developments, J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag., 13, 86, 10.1007/s10163-011-0009-x · DOI · Paper page
  59. Santini, 2010, Assessment of Ecodesign potential in reaching new recycling targets, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 54, 1128, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.03.006 · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.03.006
  60. Sihvonen, 2015, Conceptualizing ReX for aggregating end-of-life strategies in product development, Procedia CIRP, 29, 639, 10.1016/j.procir.2015.01.026 · DOI · Paper page
  61. Sihvonen, 2017, Eco-design practices with a focus on quantitative environmental targets: an exploratory content analysis within ICT sector, J. Clean. Prod., 143, 769, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.047 · DOI
  62. Singh, 2016, Resource recovery from post-consumer waste: important lessons for the upcoming circular economy, J. Clean. Prod., 134, 342, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.020 · DOI · Paper page
  63. Smol, 2015, The possible use of sewage sludge ash (SSA) in the construction industry as a way towards a circular economy, J. Clean. Prod., 95, 45, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.051 · DOI · Paper page
  64. Sousa-Zomer, 2018, Exploring the challenges for circular business implementation in manufacturing companies: an empirical investigation of a pay-per-use service provider, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 135, 3, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.10.033 · DOI · Paper page
  65. Su, 2013, A review of the circular economy in China: moving from rhetoric to implementation, J. Clean. Prod., 42, 215, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.020 · DOI · Paper page
  66. Tukker, 2015, Product services for a resource-efficient and circular economy–a review, J. Clean. Prod., 97, 76, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.049 · DOI · Paper page
  67. Tuominen, 2007, Assessing the interaction between transport policy targets and policy implementation—a Finnish case study, Transp. Policy, 14, 388, 10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.04.002 · DOI
  68. Tecchio, 2017, In search of standards to support circularity in product policies: a systematic approach, J. Clean. Prod., 168, 1533, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.198 · DOI
  69. Wang, 2013, Policies and perspective on end-of-life vehicles in China, J. Clean. Prod., 44, 168, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.036 · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.036
  70. Willskytt, 2016, Framework for analysing resource-efficient solutions, EcoBalance Conference 2016
  71. Wieser, 2016, Beyond planned obsolescence: product lifespans and the challenges to a circular economy, GAIA-Ecol. Perspect. Sci. Soc., 25, 156
  72. Zaman, 2015, A comprehensive review of the development of zero waste management: lessons learned and guidelines, J. Clean. Prod., 91, 12, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.013 · DOI · Paper page
  73. Zink, 2017, Circular economy rebound, J. Ind. Ecol., 21, 593, 10.1111/jiec.12545 · DOI · Paper page
  74. Zhu, 2010, Circular economy practices among Chinese manufacturers varying in environmental-oriented supply chain cooperation and the performance implications, J. Environ. Manage., 91, 1324, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.02.013 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 1,414

Metadata

Authors
Morseletto, P.
Venue
Resources, Conservation and Recycling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-02
Volume
153
Pages
104553
ISSN
0921-3449 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2988590694
Cited by
1,414
References
12
FWCI
166.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Targets for a circular economy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104553
The paper
Morseletto, P. (2020). Targets for a circular economy. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104553

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.