CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 556

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A typology of circular economy discourses: Navigating the diverse visions of a contested paradigm

Calisto Friant, Martin, Vermeulen, Walter J.V., Salomone, Roberta·2020·Resources, Conservation and Recycling
DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104917
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104917

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Image 1
CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 1 Main steps in research methods.
Fig. 1 Main steps in research methods.CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 2 Interactions of the Energy, Materials, Biodiversity Nexus (synergies are marked in green arrows, interactions with possible trade-offs are marked with red arrows). (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Fig. 2 Interactions of the Energy, Materials, Biodiversity Nexus (synergies are marked in green arrows, interactions with possible trade-offs are marked with red arrows). (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 4 Conceptual Differentiation between Circular Economy and Circular Society.
Fig. 4 Conceptual Differentiation between Circular Economy and Circular Society.CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 5 Circularity discourse typology.
Fig. 5 Circularity discourse typology.CC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 11 references

Research works printed but not linked: 127

  1. Albarillo, 2014, Language in Social Science Databases: english Versus Non-English Articles in JSTOR and Scopus, Behav. Soc. Sci. Libr., 33, 77
  2. Allwood, 2011, Material efficiency: a white paper, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 55, 362, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.11.002 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Ampe, 2019, A transition in the Dutch wastewater system? The struggle between discourses and with lock-ins, J. Environ. Policy Plan., 1
  4. Arler, 2018, Revitalizing traditional chinese concepts in the modern ecological civilization debate, Open J. Philos., 8, 102, 10.4236/ojpp.2018.82009 · DOI
  5. Artaraz, 2015, Suma qamaña in Bolivia: indigenous understandings of well-being and their contribution to a post-neoliberal paradigm, Lat. Am. Perspect., 42, 216, 10.1177/0094582X14547501 · DOI
  6. Audet, 2016, Transition as discourse, Int. J. Sustain. Dev., 19, 365, 10.1504/IJSD.2016.080512 · DOI
  7. Baas, 1995, Cleaner production: beyond projects, J. Clean. Prod., 3, 55, 10.1016/0959-6526(95)00042-D · DOI
  8. Barrière, 2019, Introductory Chapter: an Interweaving to Be Formalized, the Biosphere Faced with the Relationship Between the Human and the Non-human, 1
  9. Batista, 2018, In search of a circular supply chain archetype–a content-analysis-based literature review, Prod. Plan. Control, 29, 438, 10.1080/09537287.2017.1343502 · DOI
  10. Bengtsson, 2018, Transforming systems of consumption and production for achieving the sustainable development goals: moving beyond efficiency, Sustain. Sci., 13, 1533, 10.1007/s11625-018-0582-1 · DOI
  11. Blomsma, 2018, Collective ‘action recipes’ in a circular economy – On waste and resource management frameworks and their role in collective change, J. Clean. Prod., 199, 969, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.145 · DOI
  12. Blomsma, 2017, The emergence of circular economy: a new framing around prolonging resource productivity, J. Ind. Ecol., 21, 603, 10.1111/jiec.12603 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Bourg, 2018, De l’économie circulaire à l’économie permacirculaire, Ann. des Mines - Responsab. Environ., 89, 30
  14. Boyle, 1977, Energy recovery from sanitary landfills - a review, 119
  15. Bruel, 2019, Linking industrial ecology and ecological economics: a theoretical and empirical foundation for the circular economy, J. Ind. Ecol., 23, 12, 10.1111/jiec.12745 · DOI
  16. Calisto Friant, 2019, Deliberating for sustainability: lessons from the Porto Alegre experiment with participatory budgeting, Int. J. Urban Sustain. Dev., 11, 81, 10.1080/19463138.2019.1570219 · DOI
  17. Calisto Friant, 2015, The buen vivir: a policy to survive the anthropocene?, Glob. Policy, 6, 64, 10.1111/1758-5899.12187 · DOI
  18. Cavanagh, 2018, Political ecology, variegated green economies, and the foreclosure of alternative sustainabilities, J. Polit. Ecol., 24, 200
  19. Chaves Ávila, 2018, La economía social ante los paradigmas económicos emergentes: innovación social, economía colaborativa, economía circular, responsabilidad social empresarial, economía del bien común, empresa social y economía solidaria, CIRIEC-España, Rev. Econ. pública, Soc. y Coop., 5
  20. Colombo, 2019, The discourse of eco-innovation in the European Union: an analysis of the Eco-Innovation Action Plan and Horizon 2020, J. Clean. Prod., 214, 653, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.150 · DOI
  21. Corona, 2019, Towards sustainable development through the circular economy—a review and critical assessment on current circularity metrics, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104498 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Corvellec, 2020, Introduction to the special issue on the contested realities of the circular economy, Cult. Organ., 26, 97, 10.1080/14759551.2020.1717733 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Côté, 1998, Designing eco-industrial parks: a synthesis of some experiences, J. Clean. Prod., 6, 181, 10.1016/S0959-6526(98)00029-8 · DOI
  24. Cullen, 2017, Circular economy: theoretical benchmark or perpetual motion machine?, J. Ind. Ecol., 21, 483, 10.1111/jiec.12599 · DOI
  25. D’Amato, 2019, Thinking green, circular or bio: eliciting researchers’ perspectives on a sustainable economy with Q method, J. Clean. Prod., 230, 460, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.099 · DOI
  26. Del Borghi, 2020, Circular economy approach to reduce Water-energy-food nexus, Curr. Opin. Environ. Sci. Heal., 13, 23, 10.1016/j.coesh.2019.10.002 · DOI
  27. Deléage, 2019, L'insurrection des « gilets jaunes », et après ?, Ecol. Polit., 5
  28. Desing, 2020, A circular economy within the planetary boundaries: towards a resource-based, systemic approach, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 155, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104673 · DOI
  29. Dryzek, 2019, The crisis of democracy and the science of deliberation, Science (80-.), 363, 1144, 10.1126/science.aaw2694 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Feola, 2019, Capitalism in sustainability transitions research: time for a critical turn?, Environ. Innov. Soc. Transitions.
  31. Feola, 2019, Degrowth and the unmaking of capitalism: beyond the “decolonization of the imaginary.”, ACME An Int. J. Crit. Geogr., 18, 977
  32. Feola, 2019, One transition, many transitions? A corpus-based study of societal sustainability transition discourses in four civil society's proposals, Sustain. Sci., 14, 1643, 10.1007/s11625-018-0631-9 · DOI
  33. Fergnani, 2019, Scenario archetypes of the futures of capitalism: the conflict between the psychological attachment to capitalism and the prospect of its dissolution, Futures, 105, 1, 10.1016/j.futures.2018.06.006 · DOI
  34. Fletcher, 2019, Ecotourism after nature: anthropocene tourism as a new capitalist “fix.”, J. Sustain. Tour., 27, 522, 10.1080/09669582.2018.1471084 · DOI
  35. Fletcher, 2012, Capitalizing on chaos: climate change and disaster capitalism, Ephemera, 12, 97
  36. Fratini, 2019, Exploring circular economy imaginaries in European cities: a research agenda for the governance of urban sustainability transitions, J. Clean. Prod., 228, 974, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.193 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Frenken, 2017, Political economies and environmental futures for the sharing economy, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci., 375
  38. Frosch, 1989, Strategies for manufacturing, Sci. Am., 261, 144, 10.1038/scientificamerican0989-144 · DOI
  39. Geisendorf, 2018, The circular economy and circular economic concepts-a literature analysis and redefinition, Thunderbird Int. Bus. Rev., 60, 771, 10.1002/tie.21924 · DOI
  40. Geissdoerfer, 2017, The Circular Economy – A new sustainability paradigm?, J. Clean. Prod., 143, 757, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Greenhalgh, 2018, Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews?, Eur. J. Clin. Invest., 48, e12931, 10.1111/eci.12931 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Guide, 2003, The challenge of closed-loop supply chains, Interfaces (Providence), 33, 2
  43. Gutberlet, 2017, Waste picker organizations and their contribution to the circular economy: two case studies from a Global South Perspective, Resources, 6, 10.3390/resources6040052 · DOI
  44. Handcock, 2011, Comment: on the concept of snowball sampling, Sociol. Methodol., 41, 367, 10.1111/j.1467-9531.2011.01243.x · DOI
  45. Hara, 2012, Historical evolution and development of waste management and recycling systems-analysis of Japan's experiences, J. Environ. Stud. Sci., 2, 296, 10.1007/s13412-012-0094-8 · DOI
  46. Hardin, 1968, The tragedy of the commons, Science, 162, 1243, 10.1126/science.162.3859.1243 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Hausknost, 2017, A transition to which bioeconomy? An exploration of diverging techno-political choices, Sustain., 9
  48. Hayward, 2019, Sustainable living: bridging the north-south divide in lifestyles and consumption debates, Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour., 44, 10.1146/annurev-environ-101718-033119 · DOI
  49. Heck, 2018, Land use options for staying within the planetary boundaries – synergies and trade-offs between global and local sustainability goals, Glob. Environ. Chang., 49, 73, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.02.004 · DOI
  50. Hendrixson, 2019, Threats and burdens: challenging scarcity-driven narratives of “overpopulation.”, Geoforum, 101, 250, 10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.08.009 · DOI
  51. Hickel, 2019, Is green growth possible?, New Polit. Econ., 1
  52. Hobson, 2019, ‘Small stories of closing loops’: social circularity and the everyday circular economy, Clim. Change
  53. Holcomb, 1970, Waste-water treatment: the tide is turning, Science (80-.), 169, 457, 10.1126/science.169.3944.457 · DOI
  54. Homrich, 2018, The circular economy umbrella: trends and gaps on integrating pathways, J. Clean. Prod., 175, 525, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.064 · DOI
  55. Hotta, 2011, Is resource efficiency a solution for sustainability challenges?-Japan's sustainable strategy and resource productivity policy in the 21st century, Sapiens, 4, 1
  56. Hughes, 1975, Biological aspects of recycling, J. R. Soc. Arts, 123, 114
  57. Irwin, 2015, Transition design: a proposal for a new area of design practice, study, and research, Des. Cult., 7, 229
  58. Jin, 2008, Ecological civilization: from conception to practice in China, Clean Technol. Environ. Policy, 10, 111, 10.1007/s10098-008-0147-6 · DOI
  59. Junnila, 2018, Influence of reduced ownership on the environmental benefits of the circular economy, Sustain., 10
  60. Jurgilevich, 2016, Transition towards circular economy in the food system, Sustain, 8, 1
  61. Kalmykova, 2018, Circular economy – from review of theories and practices to development of implementation tools, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 135, 190, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.10.034 · DOI · Paper page
  62. Kirchherr, 2018, Barriers to the circular economy: evidence from the European Union (EU), Ecol. Econ., 150, 264, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.04.028 · DOI · Paper page
  63. Kirchherr, 2016, Cleaning up the big muddy: a meta-synthesis of the research on the social impact of dams, Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 60, 115, 10.1016/j.eiar.2016.02.007 · DOI
  64. Kirchherr, 2019, Research on the circular economy: a critique of the field, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104480 · DOI · Paper page
  65. Kjaer, 2019, Product/Service-systems for a circular economy: the route to decoupling economic growth from resource consumption?, J. Ind. Ecol., 23, 22, 10.1111/jiec.12747 · DOI · Paper page
  66. Korhonen, 2018, Circular economy: the concept and its limitations, Ecol. Econ., 143, 37, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.041 · DOI · Paper page
  67. Korhonen, 2018, Circular economy as an essentially contested concept, J. Clean. Prod., 175, 544, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.111 · DOI · Paper page
  68. Kothari, 2014, Buen vivir, degrowth and ecological swaraj: alternatives to sustainable development and the green economy, Dev., 57, 362
  69. Kühl, 2019, How does servitisation affect supply chain circularity?–A systematic literature review, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag.
  70. Kuzmina, 2019, Future scenarios for fast-moving consumer goods in a circular economy, Futures, 107, 74, 10.1016/j.futures.2018.12.001 · DOI
  71. Lapko, 2019, In pursuit of closed-loop supply chains for critical materials: an exploratory study in the green energy sector, J. Ind. Ecol., 23, 182, 10.1111/jiec.12741 · DOI
  72. Laurent, 2019, La Transition Écologique Française : de L’enlisement À L’encastrement, OFCE policy Br., 1
  73. Lazarevic, 2017, Narrating expectations for the circular economy: towards a common and contested European transition, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 31, 60, 10.1016/j.erss.2017.05.006 · DOI · Paper page
  74. Lehmann, H., Schmidt-Bleek, F., Manstein, C., 2018. Factor X – 25 years – “Factor X Concept” is essential for achieving sustainable development, in: Lehmann, H. (Ed.), Factor X Challenges, Implementation Strategies and Examples for a Sustainable Use of Natural Resources. pp. 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50079-9_1. · DOI
  75. Lehmann, 2018, Implementing the Urban Nexus approach for improved resource-efficiency of developing cities in Southeast-Asia. City, Cult. Soc.
  76. Levick, 1975, Resource Recovery From Industrial And Domestic Waste, J. R. Soc. Arts, 123, 126
  77. Malleson, 2016, A Community-based good life or eco-apartheid, Radic. Philos. Rev., 19, 593
  78. Manninen, 2018, Do circular economy business models capture intended environmental value propositions?, J. Clean. Prod., 171, 413, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.003 · DOI · Paper page
  79. Marin, 2018, Interpreting circularity. Circular city representations concealing transition drivers, Sustain, 10, 1310, 10.3390/su10051310 · DOI · Paper page
  80. Mayumi, 2019, Reconsidering “circular economy” in terms of irreversible evolution of economic activity and interplay between technosphere and biosphere, Rom. J. Econ. Forecast., 22, 196
  81. McDowall, 2017, Circular economy policies in China and Europe, J. Ind. Ecol., 21, 651, 10.1111/jiec.12597 · DOI
  82. Mehta, 2019, The new politics and geographies of scarcity, Geoforum, 101, 222, 10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.10.027 · DOI
  83. Merli, 2018, How do scholars approach the circular economy? A systematic literature review, J. Clean. Prod., 178, 703, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.112 · DOI
  84. Millar, 2019, The circular economy: swings and roundabouts?, Ecol. Econ., 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.12.012 · DOI
  85. Moreau, 2019, Enough metals? Resource constraints to supply a fully renewable energy system, Resources, 8, 29, 10.3390/resources8010029 · DOI
  86. Moreau, 2017, Coming full circle: why social and institutional dimensions matter for the circular economy, J. Ind. Ecol., 21, 497, 10.1111/jiec.12598 · DOI
  87. Murray, 2017, The circular economy: an interdisciplinary exploration of the concept and application in a global context, J. Bus. Ethics, 140, 369, 10.1007/s10551-015-2693-2 · DOI · Paper page
  88. Naustdalslid, 2014, Circular economy in China - the environmental dimension of the harmonious society, Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol., 21, 303, 10.1080/13504509.2014.914599 · DOI
  89. Nieto, 2019, Macroeconomic modelling under energy constraints: global low carbon transition scenarios, Energy Policy
  90. Nylén, 2019, How does the circular economy discourse affect policy-making? The case of streamlining waste utilisation in Finnish earthworks, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 149, 532, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.06.029 · DOI
  91. Paez, 2017, Gray literature: an important resource in systematic reviews, J. Evid. Based. Med., 10, 233, 10.1111/jebm.12266 · DOI · Paper page
  92. Pomponi, 2017, Circular economy for the built environment: a research framework, J. Clean. Prod., 143, 710, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.055 · DOI
  93. Prieto-Sandoval, 2018, Towards a consensus on the circular economy, J. Clean. Prod., 179, 605, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.224 · DOI
  94. Rammelt, 2014, A systems and thermodynamics perspective on technology in the circular economy, Real-World Econ. Rev., 25
  95. Reike, 2018, The circular economy: new or refurbished as CE 3.0? — Exploring controversies in the conceptualization of the circular economy through a focus on history and resource value retention options, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 135, 246, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.08.027 · DOI
  96. Repo, 2018, Lack of congruence between european citizen perspectives and policies on circular economy, Eur. J. Sustain. Dev., 7, 249, 10.14207/ejsd.2018.v7n1p249 · DOI
  97. Reuter, 2019, Challenges of the circular economy: a material, metallurgical, and product design perspective, Annu. Rev. Mater. Res., 49, 10.1146/annurev-matsci-070218-010057 · DOI
  98. Reynaud, 2019, Agro-ecology in action: the environmental oasis projects, Environ. Econ., 10, 66, 10.21511/ee.10(1).2019.05 · DOI
  99. Rinzin, 2006, On the middle path: the social basis for sustainable development in Bhutan, Ned. Geogr. Stud., 1
  100. Rinzin, 2007, Public perceptions of Bhutan's approach to sustainable development in practice, Sustain. Dev., 15, 52, 10.1002/sd.293 · DOI
  101. Rogers, 1998, Going backwards: reverse logistics trends and practices, Reverse Logistics Executive Council
  102. Ryan, 1992, EcoDesign: design and the response to the greening of the international market, Des. Stud., 13, 3, 10.1016/0142-694X(92)80002-G · DOI
  103. Saavedra, 2018, Theoretical contribution of industrial ecology to circular economy, J. Clean. Prod., 170, 1514, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.260 · DOI
  104. Saunders, 2011, On the attributes of a critical literature review, Coaching, 4, 156
  105. Schröder, 2019, Degrowth within – aligning circular economy and strong sustainability narratives, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 146, 190, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.03.038 · DOI
  106. Schröder, 2018, Circular economy and power relations in global value chains: tensions and trade-offs for lower income countries, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.04.003 · DOI
  107. Schwartz, P., Randall, D., 2003. An abrupt climate change scenario and its implications for United States National Security. Washington, DC. · DOI
  108. Schwarz, M., Thompson, M.(Michael), 1990. Divided we stand : redefining politics, technology, and social choice. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  109. Shumba, 2011, Commons thinking, ecological intelligence and the ethical and moral framework of Ubuntu: an imperative for sustainable development, J. Media Commun. Stud., 3, 84
  110. Silva, 2016, The role of policy labels, keywords and framing in transitioning waste policy, J. Clean. Prod., 115, 224, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.069 · DOI
  111. Steffen, 2015, Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet, Science (80-.), 347, 10.1126/science.1259855 · DOI · Paper page
  112. Subramanian, 2018, Role of traditional Chinese philosophies and new product development under circular economy in private manufacturing enterprise performance, Int. J. Prod. Res.
  113. Takahashi, 2020, Economic rationalism or administrative rationalism? Curbside collection systems in Sweden and Japan, J. Clean. Prod., 242, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118288 · DOI · Paper page
  114. Temesgen, 2019, Circular economy – reducing symptoms or radical change?, Philos. Manag., 1
  115. Trainer, 2019, The simpler way: envisioning a sustainable society in an age of limits. real-world, Econ. Rev., 87, 247
  116. Unruh, 2008, The biosphere rules, Harvard Bussiness Rev, 86, 111
  117. Valenzuela, 2017, Against wasted politics: a critique of the circular economy, Ephemer. theory Polit. Organ., 17, 23
  118. Van den Berghe, 2019, Circular area design or circular area functioning? A discourse-institutional analysis of circular area developments in Amsterdam and Utrecht, The Netherlands. Sustain., 11, 4875
  119. van Egmond, 2011, Sustainability: the search for the integral worldview, Futures, 43, 853, 10.1016/j.futures.2011.05.027 · DOI
  120. Velis, 2018, No circular economy if current systemic failures are not addressed, Waste Manag. Res., 36, 757, 10.1177/0734242X18799579 · DOI
  121. Verma, 2017, Gross National Happiness: meaning, measure and degrowth in a living development alternative, J. Polit. Ecol., 24, 476
  122. Vermeulen, 2018, Substantiating the rough consensus on concept of sustainable development as point of departure for indicator development, Chapter 4, 1
  123. Vonk, 2018, Paying attention to waste: apple’s circular economy, Continuum (N. Y)., 32, 745, 10.1080/10304312.2018.1525923 · DOI
  124. Ward, 2016, Is decoupling GDP growth from environmental impact possible?, PLoS ONE, 11, 1, 10.1371/journal.pone.0164733 · DOI
  125. Welch, 2017, Imagined futures of everyday life in the circular economy, Interactions, 24, 46, 10.1145/3047415 · DOI
  126. Winans, 2017, The history and current applications of the circular economy concept, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 68, 825, 10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.123 · DOI
  127. Zink, 2017, Circular Economy Rebound, J. Ind. Ecol., 21, 593, 10.1111/jiec.12545 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Calisto Friant, M., Vermeulen, W. J. V., & Salomone, R.
ORCID
Calisto Friant, Martin
Venue
Resources, Conservation and Recycling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-10
Volume
161
Pages
104917
ISSN
0921-3449
DOI
10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104917
Cited by
556
References
11
Language
en
Licence
Funders
H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review